Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Jesus Creed

Saturday Afternoon Book Review: Matt Edwards

Last updated on: July 17, 2010 at 1:46 pm   by Scot McKnight

Saturday Afternoon Book Review: Matt Edwards 2010-07-17T13:46:14-05:00 Scot McKnight

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Library.jpg

Mere Churchianity: Finding Your Way Back to Jesus-Shaped Spirituality

by Michael Spencer

Reviewed by Matt Edwards

 

In Mere Churchianity, Michael Spencer (aka The Internet Monk) urges those wounded by the church to return to a Jesus-shaped spirituality. Writing primarily to those who have left or are leaving the church, Spencer urges his readers to forget the idols of megachurches, superpastors, prosperity preaching, culture wars, patriotism, moralism, and conformity, and look for the God who is Jesus. For those familiar with Spencer’s writing, the book is classic iMonk.

Hundreds of thousands read Spencer’s blog, www.internetmonk.com. In 2009, his Christian Science Monitor article, “The Coming Evangelical Collapse,” became an internet sensation and catapulted him to the national spotlight, landing him television and radio attention and a book deal. Mere Churchianity would have been the first of many books written by the prophet from Appalachia, were it not for his tragic death in April 2010 of a brain tumor. We lost a great man.

I am hesitant to review Mere Churchianity because of the timing of its release and of Spencer’s death. I don’t want people to misunderstand me. Before “The Coming Evangelical Collapse,” Spencer’s next project was to be the search for Jesus-shaped spirituality. It seemed that Spencer’s deconstructive journey through the post-evangelical wilderness drove him to a Jesus-shaped reconstruction. Given the theme and subtitle of the book, it feels like the consummation of his ministry as Internet Monk. Undoubtedly this would not have been the case, but given the timing of its release with his death, it feels like it is.

All of this is to say that this
is a review of Mere Churchianty, not of Spencer’s life or ministry. That
review is someone else’s to write. I was (and continue to be) a faithful reader
of his blogs. I would even call them “life-changing” for me. I emailed him a
couple of times, listened to his podcast, 
and even contributed some articles for a series he called “The
Evangelical Untouchables” (think Eliot Ness), but I never talked to him. I am
not qualified to write about the legacy of the Internet Monk, so please, read
this as a review of the book, not the man.

Mere Churchianity is
written to people who have either left the church or who are leaving the
church. He opens with a story from his early days as a youth pastor, taking his
group to a Dairy Queen after a long Sunday of church activities. The students
were loud, obnoxious, and destructive, and he later received a letter from one
of the Dairy Queen employees. She lambasted Spencer for allowing his group to
behave so selfishly, uncaring about how their behavior affected others or about
who had to clean up after them. She also let him know that she was a member of
his church and had recently become an atheist. She wrote, “Christians like you
have convinced me that God is a myth, an excuse used by religious people to
mistreat others. As long as there are people like you and your youth group,
I’ll never come to church or believe in God again.” (2)

In his youth, Spencer wrote the
girl off as a disgruntled atheist looking for someone to blame for her
problems. In his older age, he realized that there was more to the story than
the girl let on. He recognized an unwritten subtext to her letter, “You see,
Mr. Spencer, even though I’ve left the church and the faith you are pushing, I
still know a bit about Jesus. Christianity ought to be about Jesus, and with
you, it’s not. . . . If Christians were at all about Jesus . . . then I might
have some hope again that the church isn’t full of liars.” (6)

Spencer came to realize the
truth in the girl’s words. Christians should be about Jesus. At Dairy Queen,
Spencer and his youth group weren’t about Jesus; they were arrogant,
ungracious, unloving, and confident that God was on their side. He writes, “The
girl working behind the counter pointed all this out to me more than three
decades ago, but I wasn’t listening. Today I am paying attention, and this book
is my repentance.” (7) 

The theme of Mere Churchianity
is that, because most American evangelical churches have abandoned Christianity
for churchianity, post-evangelicals need not leave Jesus, even if they have
left the church. Churchianity is Christianity without Jesus. Like a pecan pie
without pecans, most churches have little to nothing to do with Jesus, even if
they have a big sign out front proclaiming “Jesus is here.”

The problem, according to
Spencer, is that most evangelical churches care more about numbers, budgets,
celebrity, influence, culture wars, or patriotism than they do about Jesus. The
solution, according to Spencer, is return to a Jesus-shaped spirituality. How
do we distinguish the real Jesus from false Jesuses? The Scriptures (83, 118).
What can we know about Jesus? Jesus really existed (85), Jesus was Jewish (85),
Jesus was a part of an oppressed people (86), Jesus accepted the Old Testament,
but reinterpreted it as about him (88), and Jesus is God incarnate (89). What
does it look like to follow Jesus? Following Jesus means proclaiming the gospel
of the kingdom of God, encouraging discipleship, and witnessing to the presence
of the kingdom (102). Discipleship includes knowing God as Father, experiencing
forgiveness, following Jesus in community, and participating in the mission of
the church (100).

One of the more provocative
ideas in Mere Churchianity is the role that Spencer gives “the church”
in Jesus-shaped spirituality. On the one hand, Spencer agrees with Luther that
“the church” is where the Word of God is preached and the sacraments are
administered (212). So, two Jesus-followers meeting over coffee does not
qualify as a “church.” On the other hand, he questions whether “only the most
self-defined, formally recognized institutions get to make the call on what
qualifies as Jesus’ movement.” (212)

Spencer compares following Jesus
to playing baseball. Baseball was always a big part of his life and his
childhood summers were filled with sandlot ball. Now, in the same town, there
was also little league. In little league, there were uniforms. There were
scoreboards, and umpires, and bleachers. Sandlot ball had none of that. A tree
served as second base. There wasn’t always enough players to field every
position. But did that make sandlot ball less “real” baseball than little league?
In the same way, a coffee-shop gathering of Jesus followers may not be a
“church,” but it isn’t any less of a Jesus movement. The problem with the
church, according to Spencer, is that it is full of people who know all of the
rules, own all of the equipment, know all of the stats, and blog about player
performance, but who have never played the game. Spencer wanted to see people
play the game, however informally.

The best thing about Mere
Churchianity is hearing Spencer’s voice again. In several places I found
myself tearing up as I remembered what an important voice we lost in Michael
Spencer. I miss his wit. He writes about the pressure to conform, “There are
many who leave the church because they find they are confronted by an
inexplicable hostility toward solitude and individuality. In the community that
says ‘God loves you,’ many feel that the next line is ‘and he dislikes
everything about you.'” (182)

I miss his compassion. He writes
to those who have failed to live up to the lie of “victorious” Christian
living, “If you have left the church or are headed for the door, there is a
strong possibility that you have to leave in order to hold on to your
integrity. You realized you can no longer play the religion game. You may be
playing other games–I’m not letting any of us off the hook. But you found you
could no longer be party to the endless act that you are living the victorious
Christian life.” (136)

I miss his honesty. He writes
about his wife’s conversion to Roman Catholicism, “I’ve never seen my wife
happier in her relationship with the God she knows through Jesus. We love each
other and rejoice that we belong to Jesus and share communion in him, if not at
the same table.” (179)

I even miss his snark. He writes
about the coming evangelical collapse, “If you’re ever around evangelical
Christians, though, you realize they have the opposite problem. They believe
their ship is listing to one side because it gives them a more interesting look
at the iceberg. Evangelicals believe that people who distance themselves from
the church are not disenchanted but are ‘under conviction of the Holy Spirit.’
Christians are convinced that the generally low opinion people have of
them–such as not wanting Christians as neighbors and trying to avoid having a
conversation with Christians–is because people can’t deal with the
uncomfortable truth about Jesus. Evangelicals believe the growing numbers of
young adults who grew up in church-attending families and then abandoned the
ship of faith is the fault of Hollywood, liberals, rock music, and sex.

Riiight.” (23)

The book is a must-read for
iMonk followers.

People have written much about
Spencer’s unique voice. They appreciate his honesty, his passion, and his grace
(even when refusing to back down from an argument). I always appreciated his
love for the church. In an age when it is popular (and easy) to bash the
church, Spencer loved her. But, he loved her as one whose heart had been broken
by his beloved’s abusive and self-destructive behavior. He loved her as one who
had to put his foot down and say, “enough.” Internetmonk.com was an
intervention. But, despite his frankness about the house of cards we
evangelicals have constructed, he never left. “Enough” never really meant
“enough.” In the spirit of Martin Luther, Spencer’s true desire was to reform
from within. This desire bleeds through the pages of Mere Churchianity.

After quoting Jesus’ message to
the wayward churches in the first few chapters of Revelation, Spencer writes,
“It’s astonishing to hear Jesus speak to first-century Christians this way, and
even more astonishing to read his invitations to these churches; to return to
Jesus himself. Over and over, the same invitation: return to me.” (210)

My one concern when reading Mere
Churchianity is what people would do with it. Would they take Spencer’s
advice about reforming from within (perhaps redefining what “within” looks like),
or would they latch on to Spencer’s critiques and ignore his exhortations? The
last thing Spencer would have wanted was for his book to start a movement of
“Jesus-shaped” Christians who represented “the biblical Jesus” and who wagged
their fingers at all the godless phonies, cowards, and sell-outs who refused to
see evangelicalism for what it was. Sadly, people being what they are, many
will do just that.

So, my question for the Jesus Creed
community is, “How do ‘Jesus-shaped’ Christians (or Third Way Christians or
whatever you want to label yourself) treat those who refuse to join us?” Let’s
grant that Spencer is right–evangelicalism has sold out and is going the way of
the dinosaur. Let’s grant that a new breed of evangelicals is emerging from the
smoldering ashes of what went before. Given that this transition will take
decades to realize, how do we move forward without sitting in judgment over
those who have gone before? Can we follow Spencer’s example and “share
communion with them, if not at the same table”?

If you are a member of a church
committed to “churchianity,” what thing(s) can you do to encourage your church
to return to Jesus? If you have left “churchianity” in favor of something new,
what things can you do to guard yourself from a new self-righteousness?

Uncategorized

Previous Post



July 17, 2010

Weekly Meanderings

Next Post



July 18, 2010 Prayer for the Week


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Acts of the Apostles Adam Advent Anabaptism Angels Anglican Apologetics Atonement Baptism BCP Prayers Bible Biblical Studies Birds Blogging Bloglossary Bonhoeffer Books Calvinism Christianity Church Church History Coffee Colossians Commentary Recs Conversion Creation Creeds Culture Death Ecclesiastes Economics Education Embracing Grace Emergent Emerging Movement Eschatology Essays Ethics Eucharist Evangelicalism Family Fasting Fathers Fellowship of Differents Footsteps Tour Fun and Whimsical Gospel Grace Happiness Heaven Hell Holy Spirit Irenaeus James Jesus Jesus Creed Job Justification Kingdom of God Law Lectures Lent Liberalism Love and Marriage Mabanteneni Manhood Mary Miracles Missio Alliance MissioLife Missional Missional Jesus Movies and Film New Perspective Northern Seminary OneLife Origins Project Orthodox Parables Pastor's Spouse Pastoring and Leading Pastoring and Preaching Patristics Paul Paul-John Tour Pharisees Pietism Political Theology Prayer and Formation Preaching Problems for Faith Psalm 119 Psalms Public Issues Purgatory Religions Resurrection Revelation Romans Rule of JCreed Science and Faith Sermon on the Mount Sports Ten Commandments Theology Third Way Top Ten Lists Translations Uncategorized Universalism University Ministry Way Out Weekly Meanderings Wisdom Women and Ministry Work Worship Writing & Blogging Youth Ministry

Select a Month July 2021 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 0000


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

This chapter in Psalms declares the blessed man who meditates on God's law day and night is like a tree planted by streams. What is its number?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Psalm 119 Psalm 100 Psalm 1 Psalm 23

Related posts from Jesus Creed

Evangelical

Jesus Creed

Evangelical

The Gospel of With Us and Through Us

Jesus Creed

Evangelical

Northern Seminary Announces: Nijay Gupta Joins Faculty

Jesus Creed

Evangelical

The Gundrys and Me: Ruth Tucker

Jesus Creed

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube