Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Jesus Creed

Home
Evangelical
Saturday Afternoon Book Review: Michael Kruse

Saturday Afternoon Book Review: Michael Kruse

Last updated on: February 6, 2010 at 11:54 am by Scot McKnight

Saturday Afternoon Book Review: Michael Kruse 2010-02-06T11:54:27-06:00 Scot McKnight

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Michael Kruse is well-known to the Jesus Creed blog, and here he plies his trade once again in a book review.

A variety of anthropological lenses have been used to examine the New Testament world but one lens remains relatively neglected … an economic lens. Scholars like Bruce Malina, K. C. Hanson, Douglas Oakman, and Justo Gonzalez are but a few that I’ve read that are trying to understand the economic world of the New Testament from the inside out. Now enters Engaging Economics: New Testament Scenarios and Early Christian Reception, edited by Bruce W. Longenecker and Kelly D. Liebengood.

Engaging Economics is a thirteen essay collection examining the economic dimensions New Testament theology. (Most of the essays came from the Bibilcial Studies Seminar at the University of St. Andrews in the spring of 2008.) Half of the essays examine the role of economics in the New Testament and the other half examine how Christians in the era immediately following the New Testament handled economic issues. Particularly noteworthy is that none of the contributors or editors is receiving any royalties from the book. All proceeds will be donated to World Vision.

Peter Oakes offers an opening essay that explores what is meant by economics and discusses the sources of economic evidence. One of the big challenges is the temptation to project our twenty-first century experience with a market economy back into the biblical context. What we would typically refer to as economic factors … supply and demand, utility, markets, etc. … were not categories through which the New Testament folks interpreted their world. There was no semi-distinct sphere known as the economy. Oakes writes:

“…For
example, the nature of patron-client relationships ensured constant distortion
of what we might expect to be market interaction. Distribution of resources was
dependent much more on power relationships than on the market.” (11)

Many
economists today see economics as a study of the choices that individuals and
societal entities make regarding limited resources. That may work for thinking
about modern economies but Oakes writes:

“… The focus
on choice is problematic in a society where most economic activities are
governed by custom or compulsion. I suppose it works fairly reasonably as long
as one remembers that the choices lie with the powerful elite. The stress on
incentives might be useful, but only if it is realized that, for most people,
they were generally of an ‘offer you can’t refuse’ type. …” (11-12)

Oakes
subscribes to the traditional characterization of economics as “the study of
the allocation of scarce resources” to be the most helpful in analyzing ancient
societies. (And if “scarce” is problematic to you in light of “abundance”
theology, substitute “limited” and you will be approximating what economists
have in mind.) It doesn’t presume that people have a wide array of choices.

An important
issue Oakes tackles is the view that Rome was ruled by elites while 99% of the
population living in abject poverty. Recent studies suggest there was more
stratification than this but it is hard to be precise. While society was hierarchical,
status and wealth did not perfectly coincide. Referencing the work of Steven J.
Friesen, Oakes suggests stratification likely looked something like this:

00.04% Imperial elites

01.00% Regional or provincial elites

01.76% Municipal elites. Includes some merchants.

07.00%? Moderate surplus resources. Includes some merchants,
some traders, some freedpersons some artisans (especially those employing
others), and military veterans.

22.00%? Stable near subsistence (with reasonable hope for remaining
above min. to sustain life.) Includes many merchants and traders, regular wage
earners, artisans, large shop owners, freedpersons, and some farm families)

40.00% At subsistence level (and often below minimum sustain
life) Includes small farmers, laborers, artisans (esp. employed), wage earners,
most merchants/traders, and small shop owners.

28.00% Below subsistence level. Includes some farm families,
unattached widows, orphans, beggars, disabled, unskilled day laborers, and
prisoners. (30)

David Horrell,
in his essay Aliens and Strangers?,
does further analysis of Friesen’s work concluding that approximately 80% of
the population lived very near or below subsistence levels. The way society was
stratified is very similar to societies in pre-industrial emerging nations
today. This general construct gives us some clues about the individuals and
groups we encounter in the text of the New Testament.

There isn’t
space here for me to review each essay but here is brief sampling to give a
flavor.

John Kloppenborg
presents Agrarian Discourse and the
Sayings of Jesus. He focuses on three types of reciprocity: general
(exchange between close kin and friends), balanced (quid pro quo market exchange) and negative (exploitive exchange).
Kloppenborg examines “measure for measure” statements like Luke 6:37-38:

37“Do
not judge, and you will not be judged. Do not condemn, and you will not be
condemned. Forgive, and you will be forgiven. 38Give, and it will be
given to you. A good measure, pressed down, shaken together and running over,
will be poured into your lap. For with the measure you use, it will be measured
to you.”

These are
drawn directly from the world of agrarian exchange and draw on balanced
reciprocity … not values of mercy or justice … to make their ethical point.
That is, they draw on the self-interest of the hearer to motivate them to action.

In Is God Paul’s Patron? The economy of
Patronage in Pauline Theology, David J. Downs takes on the metaphor of God
as patron with Christ as broker. Examining the language and nature of the
exchanges involved in Paul’s metaphors, Downs concludes that Paul’s
metaphorical rhetoric has been misunderstood. Rather Paul is using metaphor’s
from the context of the household and fictive kinship, where God is the father
and we are God’s children, not patron to client images.

One essay is
devoted to the idea of holding things in common in Acts but others touch on
this topic as well. There is also an examination of the economic dimension in
James.

In the
second half of the book the focus shifts to how the early church fathers read
the texts. Longenecker presents an interesting essay on Galations 2:10:

“All they
asked was that we should continue to remember the poor, the very thing I was
eager to do.”

Is Paul
referring to the poor in a particular geographic area or is Paul making a
broader theological statement about the poor? The former has tended to be the
conclusion of modern interpreters but Longenecker demonstrates that the early
church fathers had the later view.

Grant Macaskill
draws us to the critique of Rome presented in Revelation, which includes
critique of their economic activity. Yet the early church fathers were
virtually silent about the economic issues except in peripheral ways …
sometimes being more interested indentifying the Antichrist rather than the
critique. Macaskill says Revelation was focused on union with Christ and, “For
this reason it is not to be primarily judged as an attack on Rome so much as a
challenge to potentially complicit church.” (259) He concludes, writing:

“… The
trajectories of interpretation of Revelation among the early church fathers,
however, suggest that full integration into the Roman economic system may not
have been as troubling for the church as other aspects of Roman Life, notably
idolatry. With the single exception of Tertullian, the evidence suggests a
general tendency by the fathers to overlook the systemic importance of
economics.” (259)

As I read
this, I wanted to ask Macaskill in what sense he meant “systemic importance of
economics.” Without the records and constructs by which we do economic analysis
today, what would systemic analysis look like? As Oakes notes, our modern
concepts of economics are very recent (a little more than 100 years old.) I
wonder if we are assuming a lens that was not present to John or the early
Church fathers.

Another
essays looks at the development of the idea of almsgiving. Yet another explores
ascetic values from the Syriac Book of
Steps.

The book is
a great resource for exploring the economic dimensions of the New Testament. As
with any scholarly work, the essays are meticulously footnoted pointing readers
to other resources for further study and, as with any collection of essays, the
significance of the articles will vary according to the interests of the
reader. For anyone wanting a wider ranging provocative reader, this certainly
qualifies. It is great read.

(Significant
portions of Engaging Economics can be
previewed at Google
Books.)

Economics

Previous Post

February 6, 2010

Unpaid Ad for North Park University

Next Post

February 7, 2010 Prayer for the Week

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Acts of the Apostles Adam Advent Anabaptism Angels Anglican Apologetics Atonement Baptism BCP Prayers Bible Biblical Studies Birds Blogging Bloglossary Bonhoeffer Books Calvinism Christianity Church Church History Coffee Colossians Commentary Recs Conversion Creation Creeds Culture Death Ecclesiastes Economics Education Embracing Grace Emergent Emerging Movement Eschatology Essays Ethics Eucharist Evangelicalism Family Fasting Fathers Fellowship of Differents Footsteps Tour Fun and Whimsical Gospel Grace Happiness Heaven Hell Holy Spirit Irenaeus James Jesus Jesus Creed Job Justification Kingdom of God Law Lectures Lent Liberalism Love and Marriage Mabanteneni Manhood Mary Miracles Missio Alliance MissioLife Missional Missional Jesus Movies and Film New Perspective Northern Seminary OneLife Origins Project Orthodox Parables Pastor's Spouse Pastoring and Leading Pastoring and Preaching Patristics Paul Paul-John Tour Pharisees Pietism Political Theology Prayer and Formation Preaching Problems for Faith Psalm 119 Psalms Public Issues Purgatory Religions Resurrection Revelation Romans Rule of JCreed Science and Faith Sermon on the Mount Sports Ten Commandments Theology Third Way Top Ten Lists Translations Uncategorized Universalism University Ministry Way Out Weekly Meanderings Wisdom Women and Ministry Work Worship Writing & Blogging Youth Ministry

Select a Month July 2021 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 0000

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What sign marked the houses to be spared during Passover?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A dove symbol A red ribbon Blood on doorposts A lit candle