Epstein’s New Book

Last updated on: September 12, 2007 at 12:20 am by Scot McKnight

Epstein’s New Book 2007-09-12T00:20:26-05:00 Scot McKnight

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Here is my review of Joseph Epstein, In a Cardboard Belt!, which the subtitle calls Essays Personal, Literary, and Savage (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2007). Epstein is my favorite essayist and I commend this book to you as vintage Epstein.

This piece was published yesterday online at Books and Culture as “Our Montaigne,” and I here record my gratitude to John Wilson, the fine editor, for permission to post that piece on this blog today.
The last thing I did before I found my way to bed for two weeks was place Joseph Epstein’s In a Cardboard Belt! on Daniel de Roulet’s hope-filled book Finding Your Plot in a Plotless World. Most nights, as I shuffled through the dark to our bedroom, I also wondered for some odd reason how I’d vary the title of Epstein’s book in light of de Roulet’s. I’ve landed upon this for the title for any collection of Epstein’s essays but especially this new one: The Undiscovered Plot in (What Might Be, Who Knows?) a Plotted World.
I’m routinely stunned when I ask fellow academics if they read Epstein and they reply with “Who is he?” My answer, always and forever, “America’s finest essayist.” I was once in that crowd of “Who is Joseph Epstein?” readers until my colleague, Sonia Bodi, whose recommendations I have always followed, said to me, “I’ve found a book for you. It’s by Joseph Epstein. Narcissus Leaves the Pool.” I bought it, read it, and became a convert. That was 1999. In the year 2000 I read ten of Epstein’s books and have never had a better year reading. Still, his writing isn’t known as well as it deserves to be. As he puts it and which makes me feel good: “I am ready to settle for being known as a good writer by thoughtful people” (xiv). Why does he settle for such non-fame? Perhaps because he reads differently: “Do many people still read – as I do – looking for secrets, for hitherto hidden secrets that will open too-long-locked doors?” (136)
In a Cardboard Belt! collects Epstein’s essays – always filled with wit and gossip and put-downs and no final answers to serious questions – from the last few years. Some are familiar essays (a division of personal essays in the tradition of Michel Montaigne, Charles Lamb, and William Hazlitt and which Epstein defines as a “line out for a walk”), some literary, and some about the intellectual life. But the sensational section of In a Cardboard Belt! is what he calls “Savage.” Here one finds Epstein’s ironic wit overrun by animus against such notables as Mortimer Adler and Harold Bloom as well as George Steiner and Edmund Wilson but also the dubious, politically-correct award for being chosen the poet laureate for the United States. Epstein has this to say of Bloom’s claim that he never revises his prose — and “nothing in his work refutes this impressive claim” (264) and that his “books sell without being actually read” (269). Indeed, Mr. Epstein, that’s savage.
Epstein turned The American Scholar into what it was (note the past tense), namely, a collection of the finest essays in the land, many personal and familiar. As reported in the last essay, the 92nd, he wrote for The American Scholar and rounding off In a Cardboard Belt!, Epstein was pushed off the dock by the politically correct clamor in the Phi Beta Kappa society which owns the journal. They handed the leadership over to another fine essayist, Annie Fadiman, whose leadership also seemed not to have cut the right figure and whose swan song of essays is now gathered into a bundle in her At Large and At Small. When the new editor took over, he converted the journal into what is now yet another political commentary and I closed my checkbook on the journal. I do what I can to find Epstein’s pieces in magazines like Commentary, New Criterion, Hudson Review and Nexus.
What got Epstein into trouble were his approach, his panache, his élan, his hubris, if not his content – in short, his genius and the reason I like his essays. “Life is not, after all,” he observes with a penchant for speaking his unpopular mind, “a Barbra Streisand song. People who need people, I have discovered, are not usually the luckiest people of all” (178). He didn’t even need The American Scholar people. Sometimes he received letters from angry feminists who didn’t think he published enough feminists. “I generally answered such letters by remarking that I thought myself without prejudice in this matter, that I was interested only in getting the best possible copy into the magazine, and that I would run good writing produced by a hermaphroditic zebra” (402). Letters like that in the hands of the wrong person can get an editor into the trouble that gave Epstein more time on his hands for writing sentences like that.
Epstein is famously quotatious and the quotations emerge from his forty-two commonplace books wherein he has recorded lines from his readings of intellectuals like John Rushkin, Max Beerbohm, George Santayana, W.H. Auden, and Edward Shils – in other words, not your ordinary Joes. “Few things,” he observes in his characteristic manner, “are more pleasing than to find what one thinks one’s idiosyncratic views corroborated by someone whose mind one much admires” (48). Because his grasp of these much-admired authors is so commanding, Epstein comes off for what he is – a self-advertised snob who writes for intellectuals who have a taste for sensibility. But an intellectual for him is not the professor-scholar who has learned more and more about less and less, today’s monograph-writing and –reading academic, but the aesthetic intellectual who enjoys an intelligent conversation with other intelligent people about subjects of common interest. But his preference is for the intellectual, like la Rochefoucauld, who doesn’t dig in his (or her) defenses too deeply.
Few are the writers who weigh in so often about weighty subjects without putting his weight down. He comes off as a philosopher, theologian and thinker with no known creed. In other words, he isn’t simply a stylist with irony but a man of irony itself. In his thrashing away at Adler, for whom he worked on the staff of Encyclopedia Britannica, Epstein reveals his penchant for a lack of finding bedrock philosophical truths as he observes the impact of Adler’s teachings about Plato on Adler’s seminar pupils: “After years of reading Plato, they seem no closer to escaping the cave than the rest of us” (251). “I find myself,” he states in his opening essay on turning seventy, “more impressed by the mysteries of life and more certain that most of the interesting questions it poses have no persuasive answers, or at least none likely to arrive before I depart the planet” (xiv). He continues, “I suffer, then, some of the fear of religion without any of the enjoyment of the hope it brings” (xiv). And, “You live and you learn, the proverb has it, but in my case, You live and you yearn seems closer to it” (xiv). When his father died, Epstein found that his father had written 2700 pages of his own style of wisdom. “Although he had no more luck in this than the rest of us, there was something gallant about the attempt” (9) of a senior citizen not finding a publisher but grinding away anyway (italics mine).
In his essay on why he is not a lawyer, he closes with this: “It’s a much easier job to be an investigator or critic of morality, which is what a writer does, than a lawyer, someone called upon to practice morality, relentlessly and at the highest level, day after day after day” (95). When he cleaned out his apartment of the thousands of books he had collected, he discusses the authors and books he chose to keep. “I kept a few Schopenhauer items, including The World as Will and Representation; his unrelenting darkness for some reasons charms me” (103). “I have three different Bibles in the apartment – a work, the Bible, I’ve not yet read all the way through and tell myself I must before I am hit with a most unpleasant quiz administered at certain pearly gates” (106).
What Epstein says of John Keats can be said of Epstein’s aesthetic urge: “It’s a virus, allow me to add, for which medicine has not discovered a cure” (229). It’s contagious.

Books

Previous Post

September 12, 2007

Missional Jesus 58

Next Post

September 12, 2007 Mother Teresa 4: Success

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Acts of the Apostles Adam Advent Anabaptism Angels Anglican Apologetics Atonement Baptism BCP Prayers Bible Biblical Studies Birds Blogging Bloglossary Bonhoeffer Books Calvinism Christianity Church Church History Coffee Colossians Commentary Recs Conversion Creation Creeds Culture Death Ecclesiastes Economics Education Embracing Grace Emergent Emerging Movement Eschatology Essays Ethics Eucharist Evangelicalism Family Fasting Fathers Fellowship of Differents Footsteps Tour Fun and Whimsical Gospel Grace Happiness Heaven Hell Holy Spirit Irenaeus James Jesus Jesus Creed Job Justification Kingdom of God Law Lectures Lent Liberalism Love and Marriage Mabanteneni Manhood Mary Miracles Missio Alliance MissioLife Missional Missional Jesus Movies and Film New Perspective Northern Seminary OneLife Origins Project Orthodox Parables Pastor's Spouse Pastoring and Leading Pastoring and Preaching Patristics Paul Paul-John Tour Pharisees Pietism Political Theology Prayer and Formation Preaching Problems for Faith Psalm 119 Psalms Public Issues Purgatory Religions Resurrection Revelation Romans Rule of JCreed Science and Faith Sermon on the Mount Sports Ten Commandments Theology Third Way Top Ten Lists Translations Uncategorized Universalism University Ministry Way Out Weekly Meanderings Wisdom Women and Ministry Work Worship Writing & Blogging Youth Ministry

Select a Month July 2021 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 0000

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Old Testament book does not mention God?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Song of Solomon Ruth Ecclesiastes Esther