How to Read the Bible 1

Last updated on: June 26, 2006 at 4:20 am by Scot McKnight

How to Read the Bible 1 2006-06-26T04:20:00-05:00 Scot McKnight

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

At some point in many of our conversations someone steps up to the plate and says “that’s not, or that is, how to read the Bible.” For years I have thought one of the most important sorts of books to write for Christians is a book on how to read the Bible, but there are very few professors who teach the whole Bible. Most are specialists — Old Testament or New Testament. Sure, lots of people teach us how to study the Bible, but this is not the point. I don’t mean procedural things like word studies, sentence diagramming, outlining books — but instead getting a grip on the big picture of the Bible. How do we read the Bible? How do we put it together? How do we relate to the Mosaic law?

There are three basic approaches in the Christian world:
1. Historical: either by assuming biblical history is historically accurate or by reconstructing history by using the Bible, some just read each passage in its context. These people are strong on background and on specific passages; or they may focus (as I do) on the teachings of Jesus; others focus on Paul’s theology.
2. Dispensational: I’ll not even try to define that here since this expression is now so different than when I grew up that I’m not sure it is accurate to describe much of what goes on today as dispensational is really dispensational. Modified dispensationalism has become a form of covenant theology. But, the big idea here is that God has worked at various times (Mosaic, Davidic, Church) in various ways (Law, covenant, new covenant) with his people (Israel, Church). A major point is that there is still a future for Israel.
3. Covenant: the big idea here is that God made one promissory covenant with humans, first with Abraham and the established other another kind of covenant with Moses. The covenant with David and the New Covenant are connected to that Abrahamic covenant. But it is one covenant arrangement and that foundation has not changed.
Within this view are some other very important categories: the covenant of works with Adam and with the children of Israel in order to stay in the Land. Then there is the covenant of redemption that God makes within the Trinity to redeem his people. Third, there is the covenant of grace that was established originally with Abraham in Genesis 3 and then with Abraham in Genesis 12 and 15, and then with David, and then with the Church in Jesus Christ.
While I’m no expert on the ins and outs of covenant theology, this I take to be a fair description of what covenant theology is about. Not all agree, and there is some serious shifting going on, and this gets those within that camp a bit riled up, but for now I think these big categories ought to work.
Where are you?
The first point I want to make is that everyone reads the Bible in one or more of these ways. We call this our hermeneutic. Whether you are aware of it or not, you do this. And it is better to be aware of what you do than not be aware of what you are doing.
It all comes out when someone says to you that they think you should follow the codes of Leviticus — say not mixing two kinds of fabric (wool and cotton). What you say to the other person, “I don’t worry about those codes because of ….” reveals your hermeneutic.
So, what we are often most in need of is a book that puts all this together for us and shows us the best way to read the Bible. Every time such a book comes out, I try to read it. Not all of them, of course, but any major book along this line is worth our attention.
So, I read Dan Fuller’s The Unity of the Bible and his dissertation Gospel and Law. Long ago I read Charles Ryrie’s book on dispensationalism, and then when Craig Blaising and Darrell Bock came out with their book on progressive dispensationalism I looked at it.
One I liked more than any of these was by Chris Wright and was called Knowing Jesus through the Old Testament. What I like about it — a biblical focus on covenant — was offset at times by the title: which made it seem like the author was forcing texts. But, he wasn’t; the book is a good one and I recommend it regularly for evangelicals.
The more historical approach creates problems: historical studies tend to get too complex, OT histories are incredibly intense and critical, but the major issue that those sorts of books do not give a more comprehensive theological reading of the Bible, and I find most are in need of that sort of book.
When Brevard Childs came along with his “canonical approach” many jumped ship to float along with him because he was proposing some kind of canonical unity, even if it was not subsumed under covenant but under a narrative approach.
One reason many today like Tom Wright is that he makes sense of the whole Bible with his “story” approach. The best access to Wright’s mind on this is his first big book, The New Testament and the People of God, but he has a snapshot of this in both his The Final Word and Paul in Fresh Perspective.
America’s best scholar on covenant Bible reading is Scott Hahn, the former evangelical now Catholic theologian. His dissertation at Marquette was all about coveanant, and he wrote a book called A Father Who Keeps His Promises, but he is now at work on a big-time book on covenant theology. I’m really excited about what he will propose.
This is not a bibliographical essay, so I’ll stop right here with one final observation: I find Christians today wanting a book that puts the Bible together for them. And we are in need of a really good one; one that is readable and suggestive and clear and useful to Christians across the spectrum.
So, I’m excited that Michael Horton, an overtly Reformed and Covenant theology professor at Westminster (the one in California), has now published God of Promise. This week we’ll look at this book that contends that the architecture of the Bible is all connected to covenant and it pulls the whole Bible together. We’ll see.

Books

Previous Post

June 26, 2006

God is not like us

Next Post

June 26, 2006 Wheaton and Roman Catholics: Proposal

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Acts of the Apostles Adam Advent Anabaptism Angels Anglican Apologetics Atonement Baptism BCP Prayers Bible Biblical Studies Birds Blogging Bloglossary Bonhoeffer Books Calvinism Christianity Church Church History Coffee Colossians Commentary Recs Conversion Creation Creeds Culture Death Ecclesiastes Economics Education Embracing Grace Emergent Emerging Movement Eschatology Essays Ethics Eucharist Evangelicalism Family Fasting Fathers Fellowship of Differents Footsteps Tour Fun and Whimsical Gospel Grace Happiness Heaven Hell Holy Spirit Irenaeus James Jesus Jesus Creed Job Justification Kingdom of God Law Lectures Lent Liberalism Love and Marriage Mabanteneni Manhood Mary Miracles Missio Alliance MissioLife Missional Missional Jesus Movies and Film New Perspective Northern Seminary OneLife Origins Project Orthodox Parables Pastor's Spouse Pastoring and Leading Pastoring and Preaching Patristics Paul Paul-John Tour Pharisees Pietism Political Theology Prayer and Formation Preaching Problems for Faith Psalm 119 Psalms Public Issues Purgatory Religions Resurrection Revelation Romans Rule of JCreed Science and Faith Sermon on the Mount Sports Ten Commandments Theology Third Way Top Ten Lists Translations Uncategorized Universalism University Ministry Way Out Weekly Meanderings Wisdom Women and Ministry Work Worship Writing & Blogging Youth Ministry

Select a Month July 2021 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 0000

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who became jealous and tried to kill David several times?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Abiathar Samuel Saul Abner