R.D. Moore’s Kingdom of Christ 3

Last updated on: June 5, 2006 at 5:18 am by Scot McKnight

R.D. Moore’s Kingdom of Christ 3 2006-06-05T05:18:42-05:00 Scot McKnight

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Let me begin by provoking with a question: Is Russell Moore’s proposal in chp 3 an emerging proposal? Is his proposal that there is a way beyond traditionist dispensationalism and traditionist covenant theologians a “purple” theology? Is it post-dispensational and post-covenantal? Probably not an emerging theology, but I do think Moore’s proposals in this chp can pave the way for many in the emerging movement on seeing a macroscopic kingdom vision for Christians today.

This chp is too long even to give a fair overview in a blog like this. Nor is it written in such a way that makes it easy to summarize. When an author chooses to write with 50 page chapters, it would be much easier for readers if the author used outline divisions — or at least italics to let the reader know where the reader is in the flow of the book. Having said that, however, it is not that the prose is particularly dense, though at times he does pull together abstractions like the best of European theologians. I say this only to let you, the reader, know what you are in for in reading this chapter: it will be a challenging, dense ride.
Essentially, this chp contends that a kingdom soteriology provides a way beyond the debates that have bedeviled evangelicals in both traditionist dispensational and traditionist covenant theology. I’m not sure Moore really defines “kingdom soteriology” in a neat formula, but he clearly sees the following elements as central to a responsible biblical kingdom soteriology:
1. It must be Christocentric.
2. It must be Cosmic.
3. It must be Holistic.
Each of these points is demonstrated (1) from the Bible and (2) in the writings of both progressive dispensationalists and progressive covenant theologians.
And Moore contends that such a kingdom soteriology, when worked out in a thoroughly-consistent theological and political manner, can lead to a comprehensive vision for Christians. I applaud his effort; I applaud very much of what he does in this chp; and I’m glad he’s seen the unifying capacities of a kingdom soteriology.
I especially applaud Moore’s trenchant and regular (if repetitive) observation that a kingdom soteriology is more than individualism, more than personal decision, and more than being saved from sin in order to get to heaven. Moore goes after this constellation of factors with a full head of steam. Over and over. Constantly. And he should do so.
Which means Moore genuinely does have a holistic theory of salvation — even if he prioritizes that soteriology through a personal decision grid (I don’t know how this can be done in any other way). Even if one advocates a radical holism, one will eventually get to the point that a personal conversion of some sorts ignites the work of God through that person.
I have two major criticisms of this chp.
First, as I mentioned before, I said to myself over and over “what’s new here?” This is not to say that Moore’s got it wrong, but it is to say that Laddian evangelicals have worked out much of the lines of Moore’s thinking for fifty years. In particular, many of us would point to Ronald Sider as a good example of what Moore is pointing to, and we would contend that Sider has had this stuff on the table since the 70s. And this is where I think Moore’s work is a bit skewed: his conversational partners are dispensationalists and covenant theologians, mostly of a progressive sort, and they are not, in my judgment, the ones who have led the thinking on this very idea of a kingdom soteriology. I sense that Moore is saying these two groups are now ready to propose such a kingdom soteriology, when I would say that such a kingdom soteriology has been on the table for a long time, but it has been articulated by other groups. And I would want also to point to the many, many Wesleyan theologians who are both thoroughly evangelical and thoroughly kingdom-like in their soteriology. So, my point is this: the book could have found support from a host of theologians who have made similar proposals.
This is not to say they’d end up in the same camp either theologically or politically. They wouldn’t. In fact, some of them would end up more to the left than the right. But, they have worked out this christocentric, cosmic and holistic kingdom soteriology.
A second issue I have with this chp, and one that may very well be remedied in the next chp, is that there is not enough pneumatology in this chapter. A kingdom soteriology needs a pneumatology; in fact, it requires one. If this does not come up in what follows, then we have pointed to a genuine need for more thinking; if it does come up, we have anticipated the direction of Moore’s thinking.
I could point to other things: while I think his holism is to be commended, I sense that his gospel tends still to be a little too individualistic in the framing of specific issues; his socio-political views lean (lean is understated) to the right; the issues he chooses to focus on are special issues to a specific branch of American evangelicals (he brings up husband-wife issues but nothing on war, that sort of thing). And I disagree with his choices and his views at times, but I will say this: this is the finest proposal I’ve yet seen from this dimension of the American evangelical churches on integrating a kingdom soteriology.

Books

Kingdom of God

Previous Post

June 5, 2006

The Inward Jew

Next Post

June 5, 2006 Bellagio

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Acts of the Apostles Adam Advent Anabaptism Angels Anglican Apologetics Atonement Baptism BCP Prayers Bible Biblical Studies Birds Blogging Bloglossary Bonhoeffer Books Calvinism Christianity Church Church History Coffee Colossians Commentary Recs Conversion Creation Creeds Culture Death Ecclesiastes Economics Education Embracing Grace Emergent Emerging Movement Eschatology Essays Ethics Eucharist Evangelicalism Family Fasting Fathers Fellowship of Differents Footsteps Tour Fun and Whimsical Gospel Grace Happiness Heaven Hell Holy Spirit Irenaeus James Jesus Jesus Creed Job Justification Kingdom of God Law Lectures Lent Liberalism Love and Marriage Mabanteneni Manhood Mary Miracles Missio Alliance MissioLife Missional Missional Jesus Movies and Film New Perspective Northern Seminary OneLife Origins Project Orthodox Parables Pastor's Spouse Pastoring and Leading Pastoring and Preaching Patristics Paul Paul-John Tour Pharisees Pietism Political Theology Prayer and Formation Preaching Problems for Faith Psalm 119 Psalms Public Issues Purgatory Religions Resurrection Revelation Romans Rule of JCreed Science and Faith Sermon on the Mount Sports Ten Commandments Theology Third Way Top Ten Lists Translations Uncategorized Universalism University Ministry Way Out Weekly Meanderings Wisdom Women and Ministry Work Worship Writing & Blogging Youth Ministry

Select a Month July 2021 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 0000

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was Peter's original profession?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Tentmaker Fisherman Shepherd Carpenter