Driscoll in Criswell Theological Review 2

Last updated on: April 4, 2006 at 6:00 am by Scot McKnight

Driscoll in Criswell Theological Review 2 2006-04-04T06:00:24-05:00 Scot McKnight

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Driscoll’s piece in the Criswell Theological Review, “A Pastoral Perspective on the Emergent Church,” offers a nice little sketch of ministry in the modernist era, the transition to the postmodernist era, and then the postmodernist era. Then he uses Stetzer’s model of the relevants, reconstructionists, and revisionists model for understanding essential orientations to ministry.

Driscoll’s concern is with the problem of doctrinal drift in the emerging (revisionist) movement, and he looks at eight issues: scripture, Jesus Christ, gender, sin, salvation, cross, hell, and authority. What he has to say about each is fair, so it seems to me, and I have my own concerns. I’m hearing more and more often that the emerging movement is just a bunch of evangelicals gone liberal, but creating a stir about it, and while I can understand why some say this, what I see is that emerging is post-liberal and post-evangelical because it is post-modern and post-foundational. There is a sense that our theology needs to recognize its conditions, what has given rise to its shape, and there is a sense that any strong theologies in the past also had that same condition shaping it. And that leads us to pause and wonder if we ought not to be a bit more careful about how we frame things, never losing our proper confidence in the reliability of God to speak to us through Jesus in our world today.
Others have said this, but it is probably worth saying again: the emerging movement is not a theological movement, it is heavy in theological discussion and stimulation, but it is not defined by a specific theology. It is a conversation, and one in which lots of folks are asking questions that shake and rattle some things many would prefer not to ask. Having said this, I still understand the problem for many: if you define yourself by your theology, or define your faith by your theology, then a movement that does not have a theology whereby it can be defined can be frustrating.
But, Driscoll knows more than even this: it is not just that the emerging movement is a conversation that bothers him, but his perception concerns the drift he is sensing. But, I see a problem here and it is one of perspective and point-of-view: Driscoll’s discussion is shaped to show where he sees the emerging folks drifting from where he is (not in a selfish, individual sense, but in a conservative Reformed sense). In other words, since he has been so involved, I’d like to see him “play this emerging theology out” — unfold where it has been, where it is, and where it is going theologically.
Here are his predictable words: “As a pastor I find the entire conversation encouraging, stimulating, and frightening.” And he fears a trip around the cul-de-sac of false doctrine that a previous generation spent their time running.
From his perspective, which is deep and now critical, Driscoll says this: “What started as a simple conversation nearly a decade ago by a handful of young pastors about how to do a hipper version of church has matured into a very serious conflict over what exactly it means to be a Christian.”
“The only hope is a return to the true gospel of Jesus Christ as revealed in Scripture.” This is exactly the point. What is that gospel?
It surprises me that in an article that focuses on the need for a commitment to the gospel, and one in which Driscoll focuses on central theological issues, Driscoll has somehow managed to escape any discussion of what Jesus meant by the kingdom of God. In other words, I think the emerging movement wants to re-vise theology through the lens of kingdom of God, and it tends to accuse Reformed evangelicalism, like that of Driscoll and others, of shaping theology through Romans as read through the Reformers’ or post-Reforming Western evangelicalism’s soteriological eyes. So, I think he sees drift away from that, but is it a drift away from the centeredness on kingdom that the emerging movement wants at its center?
What if, the emerging leaders are asking, we begin with Jesus’ view of the kingdom and re-cast how we see Romans (a la Tom Wright), where then is our genuinely biblical and more historically-sensitive theology? What will it look like? I, for one, think this is worth the time it takes to work it out. I stand with Driscoll, though, that if that theology runs risks of leaving the path shaped by Christian orthodoxy (with the goodness of the Reformation as well), then we will need to rethink our theology.
EP Sanders is famous for saying that the problem (for Paul) with Judaism was that it was not Christianity. Let me play with this: the problem for Driscoll with the emerging movement is that it is not conservative, Reformed evangelicalism. I’m not trying to be simplistic here, but I sense that Driscoll thinks the problem with the emerging movement is that its theology is not sufficiently robust, biblically-based, and Reformed — with each meaning the very same thing.

Emerging Movement

Previous Post

April 4, 2006

Forgiveness and the Face 3

Next Post

April 4, 2006 Emerging Peter: Eschatology

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Acts of the Apostles Adam Advent Anabaptism Angels Anglican Apologetics Atonement Baptism BCP Prayers Bible Biblical Studies Birds Blogging Bloglossary Bonhoeffer Books Calvinism Christianity Church Church History Coffee Colossians Commentary Recs Conversion Creation Creeds Culture Death Ecclesiastes Economics Education Embracing Grace Emergent Emerging Movement Eschatology Essays Ethics Eucharist Evangelicalism Family Fasting Fathers Fellowship of Differents Footsteps Tour Fun and Whimsical Gospel Grace Happiness Heaven Hell Holy Spirit Irenaeus James Jesus Jesus Creed Job Justification Kingdom of God Law Lectures Lent Liberalism Love and Marriage Mabanteneni Manhood Mary Miracles Missio Alliance MissioLife Missional Missional Jesus Movies and Film New Perspective Northern Seminary OneLife Origins Project Orthodox Parables Pastor's Spouse Pastoring and Leading Pastoring and Preaching Patristics Paul Paul-John Tour Pharisees Pietism Political Theology Prayer and Formation Preaching Problems for Faith Psalm 119 Psalms Public Issues Purgatory Religions Resurrection Revelation Romans Rule of JCreed Science and Faith Sermon on the Mount Sports Ten Commandments Theology Third Way Top Ten Lists Translations Uncategorized Universalism University Ministry Way Out Weekly Meanderings Wisdom Women and Ministry Work Worship Writing & Blogging Youth Ministry

Select a Month July 2021 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 0000

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Daniel interpreted King Nebuchadnezzar's dream about a statue made of different metals.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE