Franke’s Character of Theology

Last updated on: September 20, 2005 at 8:32 am by Scot McKnight

Franke’s Character of Theology 2005-09-20T08:32:17-05:00 Scot McKnight

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

John Franke’s new book, The Character of Theology: An Introduction to Its Nature, Task, and Purpose, promises to be a study of theology that will enable (what I have elsewhere called) a purple theology. In other words, it is postconservative and postliberal.

In this post I will look briefly at the first chapter, “Doing Theology Today.” This chapter is an exceptionally lucid place to begin for a theological student or a philosophical student. It surveys “where we are” and, in particular, where Franke himself is in the larger scheme of theological studies today.
A Brief on the First Chapter:
Franke situates what it means to do theology today in several contexts. The postmodern context leads to a chastened claim for what we can know and for the need to be constantly reforming our theological claims. The theological debate finds two opposing views: liberal thinking and evangelical (conservative) thinking. Franke situates himself in both of these contexts: he is both postmodernist and he is post-conservative. Theology for Franke is an ongoing reflection by the Church and for the life of the Church.
More Detailed Analysis
For my take, his book is a briefer but similar attempt that one finds in George Lindbeck’s The Nature of Doctrine and Kevin Vanhoozer’s The Drama of Doctrine. Lindbeck grounds theology in the Church’s description of itself, while Vanhoozer grounds it in the canonical script. It will be interesting to see where Franke comes out on these issues, and see how he compares to Lindbeck and Vanhoozer.
Franke begins by rehearsing the proposals he made with Stan Grenz on the postmodernist enterprise, and he offers some summary statements that put lots of thinking together. He knows the conservative worry about the postmodern supposed threat to truth and the charge of atheism, but he is conversant here with Merold Westphal and finds both good and bad in postmodernity — and some of it quite conducive to the Christian faith.
What Franke does to help everyone is to say that he sees postmodernity primarily as a rejection of the central features of modernity, such as its quest for certain, objective, and universal knowledge. This anti-stance is central to postmodernity — and it made me think immediately of the charge so many are hearing that the emerging movement is essentially an anti-movement (usually anti-evangelical, or church as it is currently done). There is something to this, and no one should deny it.
Franke moves into the linguistic turn, which I think is so central to postmodernity and to the emergent vision for theology, but which many of its critics fail to think about enough. In essence it is this: theology is a linguistic enterprise that partakes in the fallenness of humans and their minds and the articulations. I’ve said this several times, and won’t repeat myself: but our theological articulations are not infallible.
He also deals with the nonfoundationalist turn. Humans are, Franke says, situated and contextual in their rational work. Thus, epistemic foundationalism is neither possible nor desirable for fallen humans. (I happen to think this is the healthy and inevitable understanding of what Scriptures teach about human knowledge.)
Then Franke maps the current theological landscape into liberal revisionists and liberal postliberals, and then into evangelical traditionalists and evangelical reformists. Liberal postliberals and evangelical reformists have much in common.
Finally, Franke defines theology and breaks it into three categories: its nature as an ongoing, second-order, contextual discipline), its task (critical and constructive reflection on the beliefs and practices of the Church) and its purpose (assisting the community of faith in its missional vocation in its given location).
At this point, I have some questions (and I haven’t peeked ahead):
Where will he begin his theological construction? Will it be with Jesus or Paul?
How trinitarian will it be?
Will he operate with a flat Bible or a contoured Bible?
Will praxis shape some of his theology or will praxis follow, in the traditional model, from theology?
What will his telos be for governing the flow of a theology? Where is it headed?
Will his understanding of gospel be sufficiently relational?
Well, these are unfair since I don’t know what he will be doing. Further, these very questions may prove I don’t even know what he will be doing. This a weblog, not a review for a professional journal.
But, at the end I’ll come back to these to see what I think.

Books

Emerging Movement

Theology

Previous Post

September 19, 2005

Purple Theology is Wisdom

Next Post

September 20, 2005 The Initials Game

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Acts of the Apostles Adam Advent Anabaptism Angels Anglican Apologetics Atonement Baptism BCP Prayers Bible Biblical Studies Birds Blogging Bloglossary Bonhoeffer Books Calvinism Christianity Church Church History Coffee Colossians Commentary Recs Conversion Creation Creeds Culture Death Ecclesiastes Economics Education Embracing Grace Emergent Emerging Movement Eschatology Essays Ethics Eucharist Evangelicalism Family Fasting Fathers Fellowship of Differents Footsteps Tour Fun and Whimsical Gospel Grace Happiness Heaven Hell Holy Spirit Irenaeus James Jesus Jesus Creed Job Justification Kingdom of God Law Lectures Lent Liberalism Love and Marriage Mabanteneni Manhood Mary Miracles Missio Alliance MissioLife Missional Missional Jesus Movies and Film New Perspective Northern Seminary OneLife Origins Project Orthodox Parables Pastor's Spouse Pastoring and Leading Pastoring and Preaching Patristics Paul Paul-John Tour Pharisees Pietism Political Theology Prayer and Formation Preaching Problems for Faith Psalm 119 Psalms Public Issues Purgatory Religions Resurrection Revelation Romans Rule of JCreed Science and Faith Sermon on the Mount Sports Ten Commandments Theology Third Way Top Ten Lists Translations Uncategorized Universalism University Ministry Way Out Weekly Meanderings Wisdom Women and Ministry Work Worship Writing & Blogging Youth Ministry

Select a Month July 2021 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 0000

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was struck dead instantly for lying about money they gave to the church?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Judas Iscariot and Mary Magdalene Ananias and Sapphira Simon the Sorcerer and Demas Aquila and Priscilla