Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Constitution-Friendly Health Care Reform

Constitution-Friendly Health Care Reform

Last updated on: October 12, 2020 at 1:47 pm by Jennifer Fitz

Constitution-Friendly Health Care Reform 2020-10-12T13:47:56-05:00 Jennifer Fitz

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I read through Senator Dianne Feinstein’s opening remarks on ACB’s confirmation hearings hoping to get more t-shirt ideas, but what I found instead was: I’m worried the healthcare law I passed is unconstitutional, and people will die as a result.

I differ from Senator Feinstein in this worry, because I am a user of our post-ACA medical system and can attest: It’s still broken.

My concern, therefore, is not whether a failed attempt at reform will stand up to court scrutiny, but whether we can get Congress to go back to the drawing board and come up with better solutions. Here are some possibilities to consider.

Pricing Transparency

It’s laughable to speak of managing health care costs when consumers are unable to know what their costs will be. We now have the technology necessary for care providers to publish their raw costing data, and for private app developers to then gather that data into usable information. Pricing transparency should include:

List price for all procedures. Every medical procedure has a numerical code. You should be able to select the code and see what your provider bills.
Negotiated rates for all providers. Every insurance company either pays the list price or pays a discounted “negotiated” price for “in-network” procedures. It’s impossible to know the real value of a given insurance plan until you see how your bill will vary depending on which plan your purchase.

Pricing Fairness

Customers who pay in cash at the time of service should receive the lowest price. This change alone would revolutionize our health care cost system.

Equal Tax Benefits for Part-Time Employees

Currently, the law favors employees who work full time with tax-shielded insurance benefits. Someone who works forty hours a week at a single job gets access to preferential health care benefits that someone who works forty hours a week at two part-time jobs does not.

Change the law to allow all employees, freelancers, contract workers, and business owners to deposit tax-free wages into a permanent, transferable, never-expiring personal healthcare savings fund that can then be used to purchase insurance and pay out-of-pocket expenses, including (when applicable) the right to access the same insurance plans available to their full-time coworkers. The savings fund would be specific to the individual, not the job, and would allow sheltered savings to be applied to any healthcare plan, whether employer-sponsored or not.

–> So for example, if you work three jobs, your tax-shielded savings would go into a personal account combining savings from all three jobs, and then you could choose to use your combined savings to opt-in to an employer-sponsored plan at any of your three employers — or purchase a plan on the open market.

This approach could help fill the gap for freelancers, gig-economy workers, and micro-business start-ups while still maintaining the benefits of a competitive healthcare market.

Legalize Solidarity

Currently there are strict limits on who you are allowed to count as “family” for healthcare purposes. Why not facilitate allowing individuals to help pay for the healthcare expenses of anybody they want to help? If I want to send ten dollars of my healthcare fund to top off my next-door neighbor’s insurance bill, why not? As long as my tax-shielded savings are going to the same exact, government-approved expense that the government would otherwise have to pay for, it’s far more efficient to encourage people to help one another on a local level.

Allow Citizen Opt-in to Existing Single Payer Plans

Your state government already has a single-payer system — it’s the one that your governor and other state employees benefit from. Why not simply open up this plan to all state residents? Individuals can opt to have their premiums deducted as an additional tax withheld from their paycheck, with the balance straightened up annually on the state tax form. Low-income and no-income families can pay on a continuous sliding scale, so that everyone receives the amount of financial assistance they need, with no cut-off moment that leaves families a-dollar-too-rich to be able to afford medical care. Multi-state residents can choose annually which state’s system they want to opt-in to; those relocating, which usually involves a change of employment, can simply transfer over to their new state plan if desired, or transfer onto a different private plan.

By operating on the state level, state governments have an incentive to pass tax and regulatory incentives to fight unemployment.
By opting-in specifically to the exact same plan the governor uses, governors have an incentive to make sure the health care the masses receive is fairly priced and offers quality care.
By allowing all citizens access to a fair and comprehensive healthcare plan, there ceases to be any concern about whether any given employer-offered plan does or does not offer everything the state believes citizens need.
By creating an opt-in rather than a compulsory plan, market forces will continue to encourage improvements in efficiency and quality of care.

What else?

I’m sure readers (combox is here) can come up with other suggested reforms — there are so many things broken in American health care that we could be decades reforming all the many ways the market is corrupt and non-competitive. And here’s the beauty of it all: It’s possible to have antitrust laws and social welfare laws that don’t create a constitutional crisis.

I would propose that if senators are concerned their laws won’t hold up to court scrutiny, perhaps there are other ways to achieve the proposed, laudable ends of those laws without running afoul of the Bill of Rights.

Photo: Capybaras, by Clodomiro Esteves Junior, via Wikimedia CC 4.0. I didn’t even bother looking for a healthcare related photo — seemed prudent to go straight to cute animals.

Disability & Chronic Illness

Previous Post

October 2, 2020

Ways "Systemic Racism" Might Happen, Hospital Edition

Next Post

October 23, 2020 Feeling Pushed Towards Trump

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Books Catechesis Catholic Q&A Chastity Church Craziness Come See Me Talk Disability & Chronic Illness Economics Evangelization Facepalm Forgiveness Good Things History Homeschooling Human Rights It's All Catholic Listen to Me Survey Series Liturgical Living Marriage Modesty Not Satire. But almost. Rant-o-Rama Sacred Art & Music Satire South Carolina Spark Clutter Stick that Corner Suffering Thinking Topics Writing Stuff

Select a Month September 2026 July 2026 June 2026 January 2026 December 2025 September 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 November 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 May 2019 April 2019 February 2019 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Paul told the Thessalonians that those who are unwilling to work should not eat.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE