Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Spark Truth: The Life-Changing Magic of Reasoning Up

Spark Truth: The Life-Changing Magic of Reasoning Up

Last updated on: June 28, 2020 at 9:30 am by Jennifer Fitz

Spark Truth: The Life-Changing Magic of Reasoning Up 2020-06-28T09:30:04-05:00 Jennifer Fitz

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In prepping my first debate class for teenagers, I instituted a revolutionary rule: No participant would ever be permitted to argue a position he or she believed was false.

I can’t be the only instructor who’s ever done such a thing. Still, the pushback is proof of how strong our cultural prisons can be. The most common objection is: “How will students learn to see the other side of an issue?”

Well, that is where reasoning and research and good arguments come into play. If you forbid straw men, your debaters will be obliged to learn the actual beliefs of their opponents or else suffer mortal embarrassment as they are vanquished by the least little assertion of fact.

Teenagers do not enjoy being embarrassed.

***
Allow me to tell you what happens when you take a room full of teenagers from similar backgrounds, with similar religious beliefs, whose parents all hold similar political views, and who mostly get along with one another, and tell them that they must, as a class, debate the topic of their choice — and also everyone must argue a position they believe is true.

The first thing that happens is that the students gravitate towards emerging issues for which prudential judgement reigns. In my first debate class, the two big topics the teens chose to debate were (1) whether teens playing video games is helpful or harmful and (2) whether marijuana ought to be legalized.

The second thing that happens is that as the teens begin to research the issues, factions form and re-form as students change opinions as they learn more.

The third that happens is that even while, by debate day, there remain stark differences of opinion on a given topic, everyone has moved closer to a consensus.

Therefore, the fourth thing that happens is that when students present their cases, they marshal far more facts and use far more nuance in explaining how their position is different from a similar — but not identical — opponent’s position.

This is what happens when debate is treated as a tool for finding the truth, rather than as a device for rationalizing one’s preconceived opinions.

***

Very few Americans today have ever experienced a course, at any time in their education, where they were taught how to use debate as a means of discovering truth. Furthermore, when the concept of “listening to diverse viewpoints” is flung among Catholics, it’s usually code for “tolerate dissent.” Thus we have the tribalism that typifies so-called “discourse” in the wider culture and among Catholics, typified by choosing a pre-packaged set of beliefs dictated by one’s camp, and grasping for every shred of an excuse for evidence supporting those beliefs.

The average American Catholic, like the average American, has little training in using their minds to seek the truth.

***

Thus the kerfuffle over at Guadalupe Radio. I’m not a regular listener to Morning Glory, but I’ve been reading Msgr. Charles Pope for years now, I’ve briefly worked with Deacon Harold Burke-Sivers, and there is not a doubt in my mind about Gloria Purvis’s bona fides.

Let’s not mince words: You could not ask for a better trio of faithful Catholics to be examining the question of racism and police brutality in America today.

If you were a Catholic event organizer putting together a conference on this topic, you’d consider yourself a hero to score even one of these three as a keynote speaker. If you got all three to show up for your panel? You’d be marching to your boss and demanding a raise, and you’d probably get it.

These are people who have earned a right to be listened to on this topic.

Would Msgr. Pope and Deacon Burke-Sivers get sent to the hall for interrupting in my class? Yes they would. If anyone wants to issue a statement about how talk show radio hosts should behave as they must in Mrs. Fitz’s classroom, allow me to be the first to sign the petition. Does Ms. Purvis need to strengthen her case by taking into account the valid defense of a law enforcement officer’s daily experiences that Deacon Burke-Sivers has asserted? Yes she does, and vice-versa. But friends: They are only getting started.

***
When you see three rock-solid Catholics with unshakable credentials take sharply disagreeing points of view on a topic of pressing national concern, this is not the time to plug your ears. It is time to acknowledge that Catholics of good will have hard work to do in grappling with the many and complex underlying societal issues that have brought our nation to this place, and to recognize that in matters of prudential judgement, our only hope for peace requires a fearless determination to seek the truth wherever it may be found.

Book Cover: The Fallacy Detective by Nathaniel Bluedorn & Hans Bluedorn. You could do far worse than to study this book.

Related: If you want to watch me tell you the boring truth about the top four most important things in evangelization, and also hear a couple embarrassing stories about my early attempts to evangelize (not told in the book) here’s the info on my webinar coming up Tuesday, June 30th at 1pm Eastern.

Previous Post

June 23, 2020

The Innocence of St. Junípero Serra

Next Post

June 29, 2020 My New Book has Launched! Woohoo! (+Free intro course, tell your friends!)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Books Catechesis Catholic Q&A Chastity Church Craziness Come See Me Talk Disability & Chronic Illness Economics Evangelization Facepalm Forgiveness Good Things History Homeschooling Human Rights It's All Catholic Listen to Me Survey Series Liturgical Living Marriage Modesty Not Satire. But almost. Rant-o-Rama Sacred Art & Music Satire South Carolina Spark Clutter Stick that Corner Suffering Thinking Topics Writing Stuff

Select a Month September 2026 July 2026 June 2026 January 2026 December 2025 September 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 November 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 May 2019 April 2019 February 2019 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which book of the Bible has a talking tree?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Proverbs Judges Ezekiel Genesis