BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian
Beliefs
- Buddhist
- Catholic
- Contemplative
- Evangelical
- General Christian
- Hindu
- Jewish
- Latter-day Saint
- More Voices
- Muslim
- New Visions
- Pagan
- Progressive Christian
Topics
- Religion News
- Food and Religion
- Sports and Religion
- Religious Art
- Religious Music and Entertainment
- Religious Events
- History and Religion
- Style and Religion
- Politics and Religion
- Women in Religion
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion
- Business Finance and Religion
- Careers Workplace and Religion
- Education and Religion
- Family Parenting and Religion
- Health Fitness and Religion
- Home and Religion
- Relationships and Religion
- Technology and Religion
- Travel and Religion
Columnists
- Buddhist Columnists
- Business Finance and Religion Columnists
- Careers Workplace and Religion Columnists
- Catholic Columnists
- Contemplative Columnists
- Education and Religion Columnists
- Evangelists Columnists
- Family Parenting and Religion Columnists
- General Christian Columnists
- Health Fitness and Religion Columnists
- Hindu Columnists
- History and Religion Columnists
- Home and Religion Columnists
- Jewish Columnists
- More Voices Columnists
- Latter Day Columnists
- Muslim Columnists
- New Visions Columnists
- Nonreligious Columnists
- Pagan Columnists
- Politics and Religion Columnists
- Progressive Columnists
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion Columnists
- Relationships and Religion Columnists
- Religion News Columnists
- Religious Art Columnists
- Religious Events Columnists
- Religious Music and Entertainment Columnists
- Sports and Religion Columnists
- Style and Religion Columnists
- Technology and Religion Columnists
- Travel and Religion Columnists
- Women in Religion Columnists
Resource Library
- 2026 Calendar
- Library of World Religions
- The 100 Most Holy Places on Earth
- Patheos Answers
- Podcasts
- Videos
- Faith Leaders Database
- Anglican Episcopalian
- Bahai
- Baptist
- Buddhism
- Christianity
- Confucianism
- Eastern Orthodoxy
- Hinduism
- Holiness and Pentecostal
- ISKCON
- Islam
- Judaism
- Lutheran
- Methodist
- The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
- New Age
- Paganism
- Presbytarian and Reformed
- Protestantism
- Religion Behind the Scenes
- Roman Catholic
- Scientology
- Shia Islam
- Sikhism
- Sufism
- Sunni Islam
- Taoism
- Zen
- See all religions
Research Tools
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- Trending:
- Forgiveness
- |
- Marriage
- |
- Consciousness
- |
- Death Penalty
- |
- Election
- |
- Halloween
- Home
- Catholic
- The Surprising Evidence that Gender Matters, and What to Do About It
The Surprising Evidence that Gender Matters, and What to Do About It
Last updated on: May 26, 2016 at 12:30 pm by Jennifer Fitz
The Surprising Evidence that Gender Matters, and What to Do About It 2016-05-26T12:30:31-05:00 Jennifer Fitz
Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.
When future generations reflect on the fall of the American republic, they’ll no doubt get a chuckle over our obsession with having every aspect of our lives carefully legislated, to the point that our proto-emperors have now taken it upon themselves to dictate where and how their millions of citizens might relieve themselves.
Keep in mind we already have laws concerning toilet problems. Whether you are worried about hygiene, or sound plumbing, or commodes-per-occupant, or sewage treatment, or voyeurism, or sexual assault: We have laws for that. We are not living in the Wild West of waste elimination. And thus, curiously, the recent spate of gender-themed bathroom legislation and regulation reveals to us not only that American law is working badly, but that Natural Law is still working quite well.
When we say “Natural Law” in this context, we don’t mean the “laws of nature.” Your need to pee after drinking that beer is a law of nature, but it isn’t “Natural Law.” We’re speaking rather of the idea that certain truths about the world are so plainly obvious to us humans that we understand them even without thinking about it much. It’s as if these ideas are just imprinted on our very selves.
Natural Law is the thing that causes virtually everyone, everywhere, to abhor stealing — even though there are cultural variations in what counts as “stealing.” Likewise, humans everywhere abhor unjust violence but recognize a need for self-defense, even when we’re quibbling over what constitutes an injustice. We have different cultural norms about the rights and obligations of parents towards their children, and yet we all agree there’s some kind of sacred bond between parent and child. If all the humans around the world universally get their pants in a bunch about some aspect of human life, that’s Natural Law rearing her head.
And thus we have this odd situation: In the very fervor with which transgender activists are trying to explain that gender isn’t really a thing, we see that it is very much a thing.
What I Am vs. Who I Am
Let’s look at a few more terms. When we talk about a being’s “nature” we are answering the question of “What is it?” Is it a dog? A tree? God? An angel? A human? We also have a second question of identity that comes after the question what, that might be posed as “Which one is it?” or with respect to persons, “Who is it?”
When we recently celebrated Trinity Sunday, we celebrated the mystery of the answer to two questions about God:
What is it? One God, eternal, perfect, all-powerful, all-loving, etc. etc. etc.
Who is it? Three Persons: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
Other beings are a bit less mysterious.
What is it? An angel. Who is it? Gabriel. (Or Michael, or Raphael, etc.)
What is it? A cat. Who is it? Mr. Purrkins. (Or Tin-Tin or Pookie or Sunflower or . . . too many cats have lived in my home.)
Now watch what happens when we ask this question about the humans.
What Kind of Person Am I?
We humans have a powerful urge to identify ourselves. To know and be known, to love and be loved, to serve and be served . . . that’s humanity right there. Your dog doesn’t lay awake nights asking questions about who he really is and what his purpose is. (He may lay awake nights doing other things that cause you to ask why you thought getting a dog was a good idea — that’s the nature of dogs.)
We see this quest for self-identification in literary form in children’s stories about personified animals trying to figure out where they fit into the world. Am I duckling or a gosling?
This is where transgender activists have tipped the hand of natural law: It turns out that whether I am male or female is not part of who. It’s the answer to what.
The Evidence for What
This is not intuitive to me. If you told me that our nature — that what we are — is “human,” and that male or female were merely part of our identity as who we are, as individuals within this vast collection of the category “human,” I’d probably buy that theory, at least on first glance. After all, I can see that so many of the constructs around our cultural norms for boyishness or girlishness are just constructs.
The mounting evidence, though, is that gender isn’t merely an aspect of one’s personality. We see that evidence in the desperation of transgender activists to be recognized as inherently male or female.
It isn’t enough to be just a human.
Everyone agrees that this or that person begging for gender-recognition or gender-change surgery is a human. The bathroom thing, for a transgender activist, isn’t about bathrooms. It’s about validation. Am I duckling or a gosling?
–> The people who use the men’s and women’s rooms are vastly varied. In either place you’ll see people who are effeminate or manly, stylish or dowdy, delicate or massive, elegant or outdoorsy, prim or brusque. In either place you’ll hear tenors and sopranos both. Every profession, every hobby, every state of life gets represented in both places.
Who am I? I’m a nurturer who stays home fulltime rearing my children, and who likes to garden, and bake, and craft, and revel in beauty. That answer to who can visit either restroom.
No one steps into the bathroom seeking to validate their who identity, because who is far too malleable and personal and unique. Who is the thing that makes us different from everyone else in our category. Who is the unrepeatable, the inimitable, the distinctive.
How do you tell Mr. Purrkins from every other cat? Cat is his what, but being Mr. Purrkins is the reason my daughter would accept no substitutes if I told her we were just going to replace Mr. Purrkins with some other cat.
If all you are searching for is a safe place to relieve yourself, the law already provided for that. American law (the republic isn’t dead yet) likewise protects who — our uniqueness and our personal expression — both in our constitutional right to free speech, and our right not be discriminated against by class-categories.
The passionate quest to be admitted to a particular class — to be defined by being lumped together with a particular half of humanity — is the frank evidence that gender is not about who we are but about what we are.
The evidence is that nobody wants to settle for merely “human” in answer to the question, “What am I?” We want to be recognized as either “human male” or “human female.” We feel ourselves shortchanged if we don’t get the complete categorization.
It is as if we know deep within ourselves that being either male or female is fundamental to what it means to be human.
The Difficult “What” Part One: Ambiguous Physical Gender
There is evidence that gender is inherent to what we are as humans in the difficulty experienced by the minority of persons in whom, for various reasons, determining physical gender isn’t obvious.
Were gender merely some fluid construct of personal identity, there would not, in our enlightened times when gender roles are by no means rigidly prescribed by society, be very much angst over such an ailment. You’d go with the flow. Just another normal but unusual variation, like being ambidextrous, or having two different-colored eyes.
In those situations where the child’s apparent gender at birth is disrupted at puberty by the characteristics of the opposite sex, it would be like discovering at your driver’s test that you need glasses after all, or reaching high school and realizing you’re getting too tall to ever be an Olympic gymnast. An inconvenience, a disappointment, but we adjust and move on to better things.
This is not the experience. Our who as human beings is constantly growing and changing; our what is meant to be enduring, lifelong. It is normal to wrestle through life with the question of who we are. It is disconcerting in the extreme to have to wrestle with what we are.
What to do? The Catholic response, which is to say the moral response, period, to those with ambiguous physical gender is to leave the wrestling to those most expert: The individual, with the assistance of parents and personal physicians. If it requires time to fully understand the situation, so be it. If you initially think you’ve got the right answer, but it turns out you were mistaken, rectify and move forward. Difficult situations are difficult, and sometimes require patience and reassessment. So be it. You are no less human in the meantime, or anytime.
The Difficult “What” Part Two: Gender Dysphoria
Gender dysphoria, in contrast, is a different kind of problem. In this case, the person’s physical gender is patently obvious. There is no question of it. There is no need for time or patience or careful evaluations to make a decision on whether the person is male or female.
What is the case for resting with the physical facts? Our human impulse to consider male and female as an inherent part of what we are, derives, like all natural law, from the supernatural. As I wrote the other day for #TOBTalk:
The trouble with Christians is that we’re both body and soul. The tendency is to treat Christianity as being only about your soul, as if it were the “real” prize and your body were just the packing peanuts. Don’t ingest, don’t expose to open flame . . . just kind of keep the packaging from making a mess and you’re good.
Our bodies aren’t packaging. Our bodies are an integral part of us, and how we live in them is what our Christianity is. When we say humans are made in the image of God, male and female, the human body is part of that divine image. We literally can know something about God by looking at our bodies. Our bodies and souls, together, provide a snapshot of God. That’s what it means to be an image of something. My photo isn’t me, and it doesn’t tell you everything there is to know about me, but it is an image of me. It does reveal things about me you wouldn’t know if you didn’t have the photo.
Humans are body and soul, and in theory we could decide that the state of our soul carries sway over the state of our bodies where gender is concerned. Is my maleness or femaleness just the coincidental alignment of my body with my soul?
And yet we know that it is possible, in other cases, for our internal feelings to be wrong about our bodies. I feel like eating one more of that delicious appetizer, and yet the physical evidence is that I’m full — I just had to loosen my belt, my stomach is so distended.
Conversely: I feel like my body is grossly overweight, it disgusts me to put one more bite into my mouth, but objectively I have to agree I do have the same proportions as concentration-camp survivors.
We can experience physical sensations that don’t reflect the reality of our bodies: I feel pain in this hand that was amputated six months ago. The pain isn’t imaginary. It’s real pain. But the perception of the hand still being present is false. The physical reality is that you feel real pain that seems to be coming from the hand, but by definition must be coming from something else, because the hand isn’t there.
There are thus times when our inner life, be it physical or psychological or spiritual, is mistaken. It is our bodies that bear witness to the truth.
Who to the Rescue
In the struggle between inner and outer life, who questions can be damning or saving. Disorders of mind and body abound. What will we make of them?
Take the example of a who problem like alcoholism:
I’m an alcoholic. For some reason, whether it’s childhood trauma, or a physical disposition, or who-knows-why, I have this powerful compulsion to drink so much I put myself and others in danger . . .
We persons with free will, capable of thinking and acting and choosing, can take the reality of that disorder — even if it’s an overwhelming, uncontrolled disorder — and let it define us either for evil . . .
. . . therefore I’m useless and no good. I’m a blight on society, my life will always be a disaster, and it’s no surprise I can’t keep a relationship together because I’m frankly unlovable.
. . . or, by giving a different answer, for good:
. . . so that’s the thing I have to fight with every day. Sometimes I don’t win that fight, sometimes I do. It takes everything I have in me just to be as sober as I manage. But I’m worth fighting for, and I can sense that this struggle is making me a better person, even though a lot of people can’t see that.
This is the human condition. We have disordered bodies that won’t carry out the will of rightly-ordered souls. I meant to finish that rosary, I fell asleep instead. I meant to finish mowing the lawn, I had a heart attack instead. We have disordered minds, we have disordered souls.
Discernment is the art of parsing it all out. When is my body right? When is my body wrong? Do I have a healthy soul, oriented towards growing in the love of God, that happens to be limited by a sick body or mind? Or am I in fact just spiritually lazy?
Am I exhausted and overwhelmed because I need more sleep? More exercise? More prayer? Thyroid medicine? A job that pays the bills? My spouse to quit beating me? A miraculous healing from this brain disorder that causes uncontrollable depression?
Gender dysphoria is no less real a problem than any other human affliction. It can be powerfully painful because it strikes at the question of what we are.
But what we are is immutable. We are the beloved children of God, destined for eternal life, made in His image.
Suffering is never relieved by trying to change what we are — which would be to unmake ourselves. It would be self-destruction. Suffering is overcome by growing in who we are.
![]()
Artwork: SS. Apollonia, Agatha and Lucy, [CC BY 4.0], via Wikimedia Commons
Previous Post

May 20, 2016
Look Mom, I Found the Porn!
Next Post

May 28, 2016 Are You a Writer or a Content-Provider? There's a Conference for That
Browse Our Archives
Select a Category Books Catechesis Catholic Q&A Chastity Church Craziness Come See Me Talk Disability & Chronic Illness Economics Evangelization Facepalm Forgiveness Good Things History Homeschooling Human Rights It's All Catholic Listen to Me Survey Series Liturgical Living Marriage Modesty Not Satire. But almost. Rant-o-Rama Sacred Art & Music Satire South Carolina Spark Clutter Stick that Corner Suffering Thinking Topics Writing Stuff
Select a Month September 2026 July 2026 June 2026 January 2026 December 2025 September 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 November 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 May 2019 April 2019 February 2019 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014
Follow Us!
TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz
True or False: Philip baptized the Ethiopian eunuch after explaining Isaiah 53 to him.
Select your answer to see how you score.
TRUE FALSE
Related posts from Sticking the Corners
Is a 'Catholic Lifestyle' a Real Thing?
AI Detection and the Sin of Slander
10 Catholic Finds at the Pride Festival
TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic
Pope Leo Celebrates Mass for Nurses & Docs...
I don't have any idea how he did it, but Pope Leo...
The Sermon on the Mount, Part I: Matthew...
The Sermon on the Mount, Part I (Matthew 4:12-5:12) St. Matthew moves...
What's up from Crossway: Reviewing some of their latest A few weeks...
Janie Learns the Way of the Cross: A...
Teaching children about Jesus' Passion can be challenging. Many parents and educators...
Looking For Good Catholic Writing - October 2026
He alone extends the heavens, and he walks upon the waves of...
In "Irreplaceable," our book on vocation and technology, Trevor Sutton and I...
view all Catholic blogs
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- About Us
- 2026 Calendar
- Videos
- Podcasts
- Library of World Religions
- Faith In Media Tracker
- Advertise With Us
- Write for Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms of Service
- Do Not Sell My Data
- Contact Us
- Radiant Digital
- Manage Newsletter Subscriptions
- Unsubscribe From Notifications
- Sitemap
Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.
Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In











