Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Why Mention 5,000 Men, and Slight Those Women and Children?

Why Mention 5,000 Men, and Slight Those Women and Children?

Last updated on: February 4, 2016 at 7:43 am by Jennifer Fitz

Why Mention 5,000 Men, and Slight Those Women and Children? 2016-02-04T07:43:44-05:00 Jennifer Fitz

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

As I mentioned the other week, Sr. Simone Campbell has shown herself to be a dreadful sexist (and a bit of an atheist) in her reflection on the Gospel accounts of the feeding of the 5,000 men. The question she posed, however, is a good one.

What she wanted to know is: Why do the Scriptures give a counting of the men present so specifically? We can’t even say the authors were using the term “men” in a generic way to mean “mankind” or “people.” The Bible clearly states that the estimated attendance numbers don’t include the number of women and children present. It’s a very specific statement in that respect, and there must be a reason for it.

We can only speculate, as the authors aren’t with us just now to give their answer. However, I’d propose that there is a line of speculation that not only might be true (or might be false), but that is an important point for us to note regardless.

That point is this: If you wanted to overthrow a government, you would need an army.

Now St. Matthew may have specified the man-count for some purely unrelated reason. Perhaps it was the custom. Perhaps the crowd was mostly men, and the number of women and children was relatively negligible. Perhaps he was emphasizing that these were very hungry people, not little old ladies with diminished appetites — especially if we recall that teenaged boys would have been included in the “man” figure.

But wittingly or unwittingly, the Gospel is also answering Gamaliel’s question: Is Jesus of Nazareth just another one in a long line of failed revolutionaries?

We’ve got this preacher and he’s gathering up very large groups of men. Adult men. They’re meeting out in a remote location. And get this: Jesus Christ is able to feed an army. Warfare problem #1 solved. Oh and another thing: If any of His guys get injured, He can just fix them. Instantly. Raise them from the dead, even. And by the way, He can control the weather, too.

The question we have, all the time, for God is: Why aren’t you fixing this?

The question the Gospels answer bit by bit is: Why yes, Christ had every ability to kick butt and take names.

Logistically speaking, the Crucifixion was in no way inevitable.

It would have been no difficulty for Jesus to overthrow the traitors among the Jewish leaders and the Romans both. The feeding of the 5,000 is in part the answer to the question Jesus never posed, but others might have been asking: You and what army?

***

What we are left with, then, is a God who is meek. That word rhymes with other words it doesn’t mean. What it does mean is longsuffering.

Humans take note, the Gospels imply, I your God am putting up with a whole lot of garbage I don’t have to put up with.

God can solve problems in a dramatic, spectacular, once-and-done fashion, and sometimes He does. There are plenty of such accounts in the Gospels and in the ongoing miraculous aid of our Lord over the centuries. But other times He lets the long, slow, painful way roll out unimpeded. (Or so it seems — we don’t really know just how bad things would be if God weren’t making them less-bad behind the scenes.)

This is miserable. The meek will eventually inherit the land, but first there are piles of suffering to endure.

The challenge for we Christians, therefore, is twofold. First, we have to abandon ourselves to the will of God even when God’s operating in that dreaded longsuffering-mode. Secondly, and more embarrassing: We must endeavor, inasmuch as possible, to not be the ones our Lord and our fellow men are so meekly enduring.

Photo by USAID U.S. Agency for International Development (IMG_0060Uploaded by Elitre) [CC BY-SA 2.0], via Wikimedia Commons

Previous Post

February 3, 2016

What Kind of Place was Nazareth?

Next Post

February 8, 2016 Lent in the School for Evangelization

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Books Catechesis Catholic Q&A Chastity Church Craziness Come See Me Talk Disability & Chronic Illness Economics Evangelization Facepalm Forgiveness Good Things History Homeschooling Human Rights It's All Catholic Listen to Me Survey Series Liturgical Living Marriage Modesty Not Satire. But almost. Rant-o-Rama Sacred Art & Music Satire South Carolina Spark Clutter Stick that Corner Suffering Thinking Topics Writing Stuff

Select a Month September 2026 July 2026 June 2026 January 2026 December 2025 September 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 November 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 May 2019 April 2019 February 2019 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was Jephthah's daughter?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Ruth Unnamed Miriam Deborah