Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
“If You Were Really Pro-Life Then You’d . . .”

“If You Were Really Pro-Life Then You’d . . .”

Last updated on: October 14, 2015 at 2:18 pm by Jennifer Fitz

“If You Were Really Pro-Life Then You’d . . .” 2015-10-14T14:18:32-05:00 Jennifer Fitz

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

One of the red herrings of the culture of death is the, “What about those poor people over there?” argument. If you were really pro-life, they accuse, you’d care about orphans, and the homeless, and name-that-suffering-people-group. It’s not only a distraction, it is also a false accusation: The same people who campaign for the right of all innocent people not to be killed are also in the business of helping the not-dead-yet to live well.

The distraction is likewise used by people who will swear they care about saving the lives of their fellow men, but feel it would be unseemly to work on legislation to that end just now. Yes, yes, we’ll get around to protecting the unborn or the elderly or the chronically depressed, they say, but first we have to eliminate all the reasons people are tempted do such things, so that there’s no need for such laws.

It’s the same logic that would tell us not to pass laws against drunk driving, but to content ourselves with running AA meetings. There’s a need for both.

The “How You Spend Your Time” Fallacy

In these two arguments we should recognize a vicious fallacy and be particular about avoiding it ourselves. Those who accuse, say, an anti-abortion protester of not caring for the already-born are often being intentionally obtuse — anyone who’s paying attention can see that all kinds of practical, material assistance is being offered to those struggling with crisis-pregnancies or just plain crisis-lives by those of us who profess to be pro-life. But there is an implicit fallacy in saying that just because a particular person devotes a large portion of his time to _______ that therefore he cares about nothing else.

We are all mere humans. We cannot any one of us do every single thing. I can care very deeply about a multitude of grave needs in the world, and yet only be able to respond to one or a few of them.

So when we look at someone who devotes the bulk of his time and energy to feeding the poor or campaigning for just wages or name-that-cause, we can’t assume that such a person doesn’t also care for those whose very lives are directly threatened by this or that other unjust law or practice.

But at the same time, if such a person explicitly argues against other people spending time and energy on saving vulnerable lives, or explicitly argues that laws allowing the killing of innocents should not be overturned, then in that case we can indeed conclude the person doesn’t really care about protecting the lives of innocent persons.

If Not Human Dignity, then What?

Quite a few people who are passionately involved in this or that worthy cause are also in favor of killing innocent people. Witness the ACLU, who has rightly taken a stance against certain unjust laws that unfairly burden the poor. The ACLU is, at the same time, actively attempting to require Catholic hospitals to kill some of their patients. Thus we can conclude that concern for the lives of innocent people is not the motivation behind the ACLU’s actions.

We can make the same conclusion about people who (rightly) campaign for suicide-prevention, except when they are busy promoting assisted suicide. Likewise are those who (rightly) campaign against the killing of the innocent by gun violence or natural disasters, but who are quite certain that if only the victim had been killed a few decades earlier in the privacy of a medical clinic, that death should have been right and good. Most chilling are those who will swear passionately that every innocent person does indeed have a right to life — unless that person’s father committed some unspeakable crime. In which case, killing the baby is just fine.

It is clearly not death of innocent persons that these people oppose. It is something else.

“Dignity.” You Keep Using that Word.

People who campaign for death will use words like “dignity” and “privacy” and “freedom.” They do not mean these words in the sense of recognizing that every human is precious, a person of inestimable worth, innocent until proven guilty. When they say “dignity” they do not mean “safeguarding the lives of all the innocent” as part of that dignity. When they say “freedom” they do not mean “protecting the innocent from the violence of the powerful” as part of that freedom.

When someone is in favor of every kind of death and oppression, we say the person is pathologically criminal and look no further.

When someone is in favor of stopping some kinds of death and oppression but also favors other acts just as violent, just as egregiously committed against the innocent, one must look to patterns for an explanation.

The pattern that typifies our culture of death is this: Pleasantness.

By “dignity” what the purveyors mean is “avoiding things I find unpleasant.”

Terminal illness, depression, rape, loneliness, poverty, disability: These are unpleasant things. These are sources of suffering. They are often the cause of suffering for the person at the heart of the problem, and often the cause of as much or more suffering for those nearby.

To campaign for the right to kill some of the innocent people involved in these various situations is to make it very plain: It is not the protection of innocent lives that we are after; it is the protection of pleasant lives.

The Pursuit of Fugitive Happiness

What to do with unhappy people? What to do with those people who create difficulties that impinge on our own happiness?

Killing them is the solution increasingly sanctioned by law.

We live in a democracy. The law is not imposed on us by strangers. It reflects our national will. How many of us know a proud grandmother, showing off photos of this or that beloved grandchild, but who felt it her right and duty to pressure her unwed son or daughter into aborting some other less-convenient grandchild?

If you were really pro-life, Grandma says, you’d take steps to eliminate the scourge of the poverty.

Yes and we do. But the poor will always be with us, Grandmother. If you really loved the poor, you would not tell us to kill them.

Updated with a related link: California now requires crisis pregnancy centers to remind the poor that if they act fast, they just might qualify to for a free abortion, call now!

Artwork: Meister Bertram von Minden [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

killing innocent people

Obama

Pelosi

Previous Post

October 13, 2015

3 Things to Do with Your Brain While Praying the Rosary

Next Post

October 16, 2015 I hate it when I do this:

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Books Catechesis Catholic Q&A Chastity Church Craziness Come See Me Talk Disability & Chronic Illness Economics Evangelization Facepalm Forgiveness Good Things History Homeschooling Human Rights It's All Catholic Listen to Me Survey Series Liturgical Living Marriage Modesty Not Satire. But almost. Rant-o-Rama Sacred Art & Music Satire South Carolina Spark Clutter Stick that Corner Suffering Thinking Topics Writing Stuff

Select a Month September 2026 July 2026 June 2026 January 2026 December 2025 September 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 November 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 May 2019 April 2019 February 2019 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "Even though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

David Moses Job Paul