Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Hobby Lobby and the War on Women’s Intelligence

Hobby Lobby and the War on Women’s Intelligence

Last updated on: May 5, 2015 at 7:00 pm by Jennifer Fitz

Hobby Lobby and the War on Women’s Intelligence 2015-05-05T19:00:28-05:00 Jennifer Fitz

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Of all the reactions to the Supreme Court’s decision in the Hobby Lobby Case, Sam Rocha’s is my favorite: The health care problem wouldn’t be solved either way. Go read his comments, then come back here, because that’s where I’m going.

First a few more required reading links:

Shameless Popery clears up the several most common misconceptions about this case: 4 Things You Probably Have Wrong About the Hobby Lobby Decision
The Crescat reminds you that this was never about birth control.
I remind you to go subscribe to Women Speak for Themselves, where you can get regular updates on topics related to religious freedom, and be reminded that girls are smart, too, and don’t need our political masters to think for us, thank you.
And since all this will make you think of NFP (it will, won’t it?), here’s a thoughtful essay on the difficulties of deciding whether to avoid pregnancy. Or you can go ahead and get Simcha Fisher’s book, which I heartily recommend.
Since you might be wondering, “Is anything wrong with our health care system?” Rebecca Frech reminds you that yes, many things are very seriously wrong. Deadly wrong. One of the dangers of nationalization is that it can leave seriously ill patients with no recourse if they are given a faulty initial diagnosis.

Now let’s talk health care reform. You may recall the other week I proposed three steps towards health care reform. If you don’t remember what they were, quick go look, because I’m continuing that conversation.

There Are Benefits to Non-Cash Compensation

One of the advantages of employer-funded health care benefits is that it enables a living wage. Whether you are a senior executive or a career janitor, you have a body that needs to be cared for. Your wages might reasonably vary based on your skill and contribution to the company. The moral imperative for employers is to provide, at a minimum, that decent frugal living that any of us need.

Part of that living is the ability to pay for medical care. Given that family size varies and medical needs vary, it would be ludicrous to say, “Pay your employees enough cash that no matter what happens, they can all afford exactly the medical care they need.” Some people will have greater expenses than others. Medical benefits as part of compensation allow employers to pay their workers what they need when they need it. Need chemo? Great, got it covered. All you need is a flu shot and a well-child visit? Super, glad I didn’t spend $100,000 on your “medical fund” when your co-worker needed that money for chemo.

That’s the theory, and it’s a theory that makes a good starting point for health care reform.

There are Pitfalls to Employer-Funded Health Insurance

The primary pitfall being that your life suddenly depends on your job. Oops. Thus a reform that is desperately needed is an unhinging of healthcare insurance from single-employer funding. This does not, however, have to mean, “Only the Government Can Save Us!”

It can mean, instead, “I can enroll in my employer’s contracted health insurance program, or I can receive the same amount in health-care savings cash, and use it to enroll in another insurance program.” Because group risk-sharing is the name of the game in health care funding, it would make perfect sense to enable and encourage all kinds of group health-insurance purchasing cooperatives, most of them not tied to employment. Your rugby club, your grocery store, your religious association . . . any of these might collect enough subscribers to negotiate a decent health care plan. When you started your new job, you could just check the benefits box that said, “My health insurance is through a private association, please direct $_____ of my healthcare benefit to insurance fund #____________.”

One of the Pitfalls is that Your Employer Might Have Bad Ideas About what Coverage You Need

In other words: You might be smarter than your boss.

Whether it’s procedures that you’re sure you need and your boss is sure you do not, or the reverse; a deductible that’s impossible, or co-pays that induce panic attacks . . . it is possible that there’s a massive misalignment between your needs and your employer’s negotiated health care plan.

A single-payer system is no solution. Only change: Suddenly we all work for the same pointy-haired boss. Same problem, massively larger scale. At least with corporate, you can hope to find a new job. Finding a new country is somewhat more difficult.

Neither system will work nearly so well as paying employees a health-care benefit amount, and allowing the employee to choose which health insurance is the best fit.

Are You Too Stupid to Know What You Need?

This is, fundamentally, the crux of the Hobby Lobby case. Were our esteemed legislators sure that you could be trusted to pick your own birth control, they would simply have said, “If your employer won’t provide the mandated services, they can alternately compensate you with a health care savings benefit that is sufficient to purchase those services at our government-run health care exchange.”

End of problem. You want your ______? Use the money your employer pays you to purchase it. Same as you can buy cigarettes, tasteless clothing, and an ugly sofa. Your employer doesn’t have to approve. You get the money, you make the purchase. But the moment we start saying, “The only way to ensure you buy the right sofa is to make your boss buy it for you . . .” is the moment we’ve decided you are not smart enough to pick out your own sofa.

Are women this stupid? That’s what the war-on-women team is claiming: You are too dumb to know if you need birth control. You’ll just spend the money on cosmetic surgery or little Jimmy’s chemotherapy co-pays if we fund discretionary health care savings for you; we must prepay your contraception bill so all the nice nurse has to do is quick inject you at the office when you go in about that lady problem you’ve been having.

Yes, People Think You Are Stupid and Should Not Breed

And they have the Facebook status to prove it. It’s not a novel idea, the whole eugenics thing has been around for a long while. I would say, “It would be refreshing if people would just admit they think you are too dumb to be allowed more babies,” but I’m getting tired of hearing the open admissions. On the left and on the right, it’s a popular cure-all.

This is the issue.

You are too stupid to decide if you want to buy contraception or not. Therefore, your boss must buy it for you.

It is not enough that you be paid a wage sufficient to buy such things.

Yes, you are smart enough to get a job. But you aren’t smart enough to know how to spend all that money leftover after you buy your lipstick and your nail polish.

Quit worrying your pretty little head over these difficult, difficult decisions.

Papa knows best. Be a good girl and take your medicine, sweetie.

That’s the war.

Artwork via Wikimedia [Public Domain]

Chastity

Economics

Human Rights

Previous Post

June 27, 2014

Should You Be Writing Right Now? And What About the Kids? And What About a Conference This Summer?

Next Post

July 1, 2014 And about that Freedom of Religion Thing . . . - UPDATED

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Books Catechesis Catholic Q&A Chastity Church Craziness Come See Me Talk Disability & Chronic Illness Economics Evangelization Facepalm Forgiveness Good Things History Homeschooling Human Rights It's All Catholic Listen to Me Survey Series Liturgical Living Marriage Modesty Not Satire. But almost. Rant-o-Rama Sacred Art & Music Satire South Carolina Spark Clutter Stick that Corner Suffering Thinking Topics Writing Stuff

Select a Month September 2026 July 2026 June 2026 January 2026 December 2025 September 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 November 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 May 2019 April 2019 February 2019 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who is the Good Shepherd in Jesus' teaching?

Select your answer to see how you score.

David Moses Jesus Peter