Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Religion News
If You Condemn Him…You Should Kill Him: On Anthony Boyd

If You Condemn Him…You Should Kill Him: On Anthony Boyd

Last updated on: October 21, 2025 at 7:50 am by Jeff Hood

0 Comments

If You Condemn Him…You Should Kill Him: On Anthony Boyd 2025-10-21T07:50:49-06:00 Jeff Hood

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

If You Condemn Him...You Should Kill Him

“If You Condemn Him…You Should Kill Him”

Every execution begins long before the gas flows. It begins the moment someone decides they will not have to see it.

If You Condemn Him…You Should Kill Him

The only reason the death penalty survives is because the people who impose it never have to carry it out. The system depends on distance. The violence of killing is separated from the moral weight of deciding who dies. In a courtroom death is abstract. The words are careful. The gavel falls. The jury votes. The judge announces. Papers are signed. Decisions are filed. And then everyone goes home. No one has to see the life they chose to end. No one has to hear the last breath. No one has to feel the final silence.

The Distance Between Sentence and Execution

Anthony Boyd’s jury voted ten to two for death. The judge overrode their non-unanimous verdict and handed down a death sentence. They decided that this man should die. But none of them will be in the room when it happens. None of them will see him strapped to a gurney, gas flowing into a mask…the thrashing struggle for breath…the struggle that ends too soon. None will feel the suffocating weight of a life leaving the world because of their decision. That is the point. The death penalty is designed to protect the conscience of those who impose it. Distance is the machinery that makes killing possible…the buffer that allows ordinary people to perform extraordinary violence without facing the truth of what they have done.

If You Condemn Him…You Should Kill Him: Fragmented Responsibility Hides the Act

The modern death penalty divides responsibility into small seemingly harmless tasks. The judge sentences. The governor signs. The warden issues orders. The technicians carry out procedures. Witnesses observe behind glass. Each participant can truthfully say, “I did not kill him. I just did my job.” By breaking the act of killing into fragments the system hides the human cost of its decisions. It creates moral insulation. Without this buffer, without the separation between sentence and punishment, executions would be impossible. If the people who condemned Anthony Boyd had to carry out the act themselves the killing would stop.

Nowhere to Hide

Imagine the judge walking into the chamber and seeing the man he sentenced. Imagine the jurors fastening the straps, placing the mask over his face, hearing the rise and fall of his chest until it stops. Imagine the governor turning the valve and watching the final moments of a human life. Could they still claim justice? Could they still convince themselves that their actions were humane? I do not believe they could. Once you confront death in the act of causing it the illusion of procedure falls away. You cannot hide behind robes or rules. You cannot say it is just. You cannot pretend it is not violence.

The Banality of Evil

Hannah Arendt described this as the banality of evil…ordinary people committing extraordinary harm because the system made it ordinary. Albert Camus called the death penalty a public murder carried out under the pretense of morality. Both recognized that evil often hides in plain sight wrapped in procedure and authority. The death penalty, like all bureaucracies of death, depends on distance. It thrives because those who sentence others do not have to touch the life they decide to end. It survives because we have insulated ourselves from the consequences of our own laws.

If You Condemn Him…You Should Kill Him: The Consequence

Alabama’s use of nitrogen hypoxia makes this point painfully clear. Officials describe it as clean, efficient, humane. The language of science and technology is meant to hide the truth. The mask, the valve, the medicalized words make the killing seem less like killing. But there is no clean way to suffocate a human being. There is only the reality of a life ending by human choice. If the people who judged Anthony Boyd had to witness that reality themselves the death penalty would end. The moral distance that protects their conscience would be gone…and with it the ability to carry out this violence without facing its truth.

If You Condemn Him…You Should Kill Him: Where Are the Judge and Jury Now?

So… Where are the judge and jury now? Do they remember the man they condemned? Do they think of him when they pass the courthouse, when they sit down for dinner, when they pray before sleep? Or have they buried it with the rest of life’s paperwork, another case closed, another day’s work done? The system depends on that forgetting. The distance is not just physical. It is moral. It allows those who once held a man’s life in their hands to move on as if they never touched death at all.

The Unbearable Truth of the Death Penalty

But the truth remains. The sentence they spoke is still alive. It waits in the cell where Anthony Boyd breathes borrowed air. When the gas begins to flow their decision will come to life again. Whether they are watching or not they will be there. Their voices will echo in the hiss of nitrogen. Their verdict will tighten the straps. Their signatures will close his eyes. The law can divide the labor of killing but it cannot divide the guilt.

That is the unbearable truth of the death penalty. No one escapes it. Every act of execution is a mirror held to the face of a society that kills in its own name. We look away so we do not see ourselves. But the blood does not fade with distance. It only hides beneath the surface of our laws, our institutions, our comfort. If the judge and jury who condemned Anthony Boyd had to kill him themselves they would see what we all refuse to see. They would know what we all need to know. There is no justice in killing. There is only the slow corrosion of the soul.

*
*If you would like to support the Execution Intervention Project (the organization that financially supports Dr. Hood’s work), click here.

Catholic

Politics and Religion

About The Rev. Dr. Jeff Hood

The Rev. Dr. Jeff Hood is a theologian, writer and activist who has spent years ministering to people on death row. As a spiritual advisor and witness to executions, he speaks out against state violence and calls for a society rooted in justice, mercy and the sacredness of life. You can read more about the author here.

Previous Post

October 19, 2025

The Collective Evil of the State and Anthony Boyd

Next Post

October 21, 2025 A Prayer for Anthony Boyd

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"'God’s Sheep on the Sidewalk' is immensely thought-provoking and conscience-stirring. Thanks. "The people out there ..."

Dr.Cajetan Coelho

God’s Sheep: The Ones Who Sleep ..."

"Greetings, Jeff, and bless you for your relentlessly regular fierce posts and your profound commitments ..."

DCF

Between: On the Person and Character ..."

"God as the Between, thoughts:As a child we were taught, in the blue or green ..."

madalyn baumstark

Between: On the Person and Character ..."

"Sometimes we make it harder than it is. Not saying things don't bring us to ..."

Patrick Dennis

Get Behind Me, Satan: A Death ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Danny & Jeff fresh writings latest poetics north texas fellowship of reconciliation Sermon theology from death row Thoughts Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 July 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 May 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In Revelation, what does the rider on the white horse have coming out of his mouth?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Fire The word of God Words of judgment A sharp sword