Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Religion News
ICE Atrocities Don’t Justify The Invasion of Sacred Spaces

ICE Atrocities Don’t Justify The Invasion of Sacred Spaces

Last updated on: January 19, 2026 at 2:26 pm by Jeff Hood

0 Comments

ICE Atrocities Don’t Justify The Invasion of Sacred Spaces 2026-01-19T14:26:51-06:00 Jeff Hood

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

ICE Atrocities

Screenshot of Livestream of Protest

The Facts: A Misguided Protest Against ICE Atrocities

Yesterday (1/18), protesters stormed into Cities Church in St. Paul, Minnesota, interrupting worship to confront Pastor David Easterwood (who was absent) about his perpetuation of ICE atrocities in his role as acting director of the ICE St. Paul field office. The disruption followed legitimate outrage over ICE abuses and the killing of Renee Nicole Good, a 37-year-old mother of three who was fatally shot by an ICE agent in Minneapolis. Protesters chanted “ICE out” and “Justice for Renee Good” as congregants looked on, turning a sanctuary into a site of chaos and confrontation.

Storming into religious spaces to disrupt worship is not a legitimate protest. It is a profound strategic and moral failure that undermines the very causes it claims to advance.

Let me be clear: ICE’s enforcement tactics are brutal and violent, constituting state-sponsored terror against vulnerable communities. Renee Nicole Good was killed by an ICE agent, and those responsible must be held morally and legally accountable. David Easterwood’s dual role…as pastor and as an official overseeing these operations…is morally grotesque and indefensible.

But disrupting worship services does not confront that violence…it actually creates more. It violates a foundational principle of religious freedom that must remain inviolable…or else none of our sacred spaces will be safe when political winds shift.

The Fundamental Contradiction

For generations, movements for justice have defended religious freedom and opposed the persecution of faith communities. We’ve mourned when Black churches were bombed and burned. We’ve held vigils after synagogue shootings. We condemned attacks on mosques, Sikh gurdwaras, Hindu and Buddhist temples and the desecration of Indigenous sacred spaces.

We’ve understood why these acts were uniquely horrifying: they violated sanctuaries…places where people gather in vulnerability, trust and prayer.

When white supremacists attacked Black churches, they targeted the spiritual heart of a community. When antisemites attack synagogues or extremists interrupt mosques and gurdwaras, they terrorize people in their most intimate gathering spaces. These acts are universally condemned precisely because houses of worship are supposed to be protected from violence, intrusion and intimidation.

Now we are asked to abandon that principle because we are angry…and we are angry for good reason.

But anger does not grant permission to violate sacred space.

The protesters may not have carried weapons, but they brought fear and chaos into a sanctuary. They transformed a refuge into a confrontation zone, using a tactic long employed against marginalized and vulnerable faith communities: violating sacred space to send a political message.

The Dangerous Precedent That This Protest Against ICE Atrocities Sets

This action establishes a principle, whether its participants acknowledge it or not: that invading religious spaces is acceptable when the political cause feels urgent enough.

But who decides which causes qualify?

If activists can storm a church over a pastor’s government role, can anti-abortion groups disrupt worship at progressive congregations? Can anti-LGBTQ extremists target affirming churches? Can white supremacists decide a Black church is “too political” and invade the space? Can Islamaphobes barge into a mosque to burn a Quran?

If the answer is no to those scenarios, then it must also be no here. Religious freedom is not a selective principle. Once it becomes conditional, it ceases to exist.

Who Actually Gets Hurt?

Most of the people inside that church were not ICE agents. They were ordinary congregants: working people seeking community, elderly and disabled parishioners, children, people carrying grief, addiction and loneliness. They came to pray. Whether one believes they are praying to the right God in the right way or not should make no difference.

The principle of sanctuary does not depend on whether we approve of a congregation’s politics or find its theology admirable. It exists to protect human vulnerability during worship. That vulnerability was violated.

A Better Way to Push Back Against ICE Atrocities

There were…and still are…better ways to confront Easterwood and the system he represents.

Protest outside the church. Hold a press conference on the church’s front sidewalk. Organize a prayer vigil that embodies the values you believe he betrays. Invite clergy from other traditions…and even Easterwood’s own…to publicly name the moral contradiction between faith and enforcement violence. Build moral witness without invading sacred space.

None of these tactics weaken the cause. They strengthen it.

The Test of Principle

Principles do not exist for moments when they are easy. They exist precisely for moments like this…when anger against these ICE atrocities is more than justified, when injustice is real and when our principles feels tempting.

Sacred space is not a reward for good politics. It is a protection for human vulnerability.

Once we decide that worship can be disrupted based on our assessment of who deserves protection, we do not expand justice…we destroy the very principles that have shielded our own communities for generations.

We cannot build a more just society by normalizing the violation of sacred spaces. The line must hold…not because Easterwood necessarily deserves protection, but because worshippers everywhere do…especially those who are most vulnerable to reprisals for this action.

Catholic

Politics and Religion

About The Rev. Dr. Jeff Hood

The Rev. Dr. Jeff Hood is a Catholic priest (Old Catholic), theologian, and nationally recognized activist based in North Little Rock, Arkansas. A spiritual advisor to death row inmates across the country, Dr. Hood has accompanied more people to their executions than any other advisor in the U.S., including the first-ever nitrogen hypoxia execution in 2024. His work sits at the intersection of justice, radical compassion, and public theology. Dr. Hood holds advanced degrees from Auburn, Emory, Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, University of Alabama, Creighton, and Brite Divinity School, among others. He also earned a PhD in metaphysical theology and founded The New Theology School, where he serves as Dean and Professor of Prophetic Theology. Author of over 100 books—including the award-winning The Courage to Be Queer—Dr. Hood’s writings and activism have been featured in The New York Times, Rolling Stone, NPR, CNN, and more. A frequent collaborator with men on death row, he sees theology as a shared, liberative act. Dr. Hood has served on the leadership teams of organizations like the Texas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty and the Fellowship of Reconciliation. His activism has earned multiple awards, including recognition from PFLAG and the Next Generation Action Network. On July 7, 2016, Dr. Hood led the Dallas protest against police brutality that ended in tragedy. His actions that night saved lives, and his story is now archived in the Dallas Public Library. A father of five, husband to Emily, and friend to the incarcerated, Dr. Hood rejects institutionalism in favor of a theology rooted in people, presence, and prophetic witness. You can read more about the author here.

Previous Post

January 17, 2026

The Lamb Not The Strongman: Donald Trump is Not Jesus Christ

Next Post

January 24, 2026 Alex Pretti of Minnesota: Prophet of a New World

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"'God’s Sheep on the Sidewalk' is immensely thought-provoking and conscience-stirring. Thanks. "The people out there ..."

Dr.Cajetan Coelho

God’s Sheep: The Ones Who Sleep ..."

"Greetings, Jeff, and bless you for your relentlessly regular fierce posts and your profound commitments ..."

DCF

Between: On the Person and Character ..."

"God as the Between, thoughts:As a child we were taught, in the blue or green ..."

madalyn baumstark

Between: On the Person and Character ..."

"Sometimes we make it harder than it is. Not saying things don't bring us to ..."

Patrick Dennis

Get Behind Me, Satan: A Death ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Danny & Jeff fresh writings latest poetics north texas fellowship of reconciliation Sermon theology from death row Thoughts Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 July 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 May 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was David's great-grandmother?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Tamar Bathsheba Rahab Ruth