Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Religion News
“Forensic Files” : “Sands of Crime”: Season 13: Episode 13: Separating Fact and Fiction (On the Murder of Juli Busken & the Conviction of Anthony Sanchez in Oklahoma)

“Forensic Files” : “Sands of Crime”: Season 13: Episode 13: Separating Fact and Fiction (On the Murder of Juli Busken & the Conviction of Anthony Sanchez in Oklahoma)

Last updated on: February 6, 2023 at 4:59 pm by Jeff Hood

“Forensic Files” : “Sands of Crime”: Season 13: Episode 13: Separating Fact and Fiction (On the Murder of Juli Busken & the Conviction of Anthony Sanchez in Oklahoma) 2023-02-06T16:59:02-06:00 Jeff Hood

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

intro screenshot

“Forensic Files” : “Sands of Crime”: Season 13: Episode 13: Separating Fact and Fiction (On the Murder of Juli Busken & the Conviction of Anthony Sanchez in Oklahoma)

From 1996 to 2011, a documentary-style television show called “Forensic Files” aired in 406 episodes on TLC (The Learning Channel). Since 2014, reruns of the original series can often be seen on CNN Headline News. Starting in 2020, a new iteration of the show called, “Forensic Files II” began to broadcast. Selling itself as a show that chronicles the solving of seemingly impossible cases through the use of forensic science, the show highlights people who are involved in these types of situations (scientists, victim’s families, prosecutors, lawyers and a whole host of others). Sometimes, although much more rarely, the show chronicles how people are exonerated by forensic evidence. Each episode is constructed to make it appear as if there are no questions about the evidence presented in the case. Like most sensational crime shows, the majority of the stories paint the alleged perpetrators as monsters and the authorities as heroes. Interestingly enough…the tagline of the show is, “No witnesses. No leads. No problem.” It’s that simple…right? Hardly.

With regards to Anthony Sanchez’s case, the episode (Season 13: Episode 13) is entitled, “Sands of Crime.” Based on the episode, one would think that this is an open and shut case. “In 1996, Juli Busken is abducted at her apartment…driven to a lake…sexually assaulted…and shot and killed…all by Anthony Sanchez. The case is miraculously solved eight years later by DNA evidence.” Successful episode…right? Hardly.

When watching the episode, there are a couple of loose ends that are glossed over…to make it seem like there is no question about Anthony Sanchez’s guilt. There is no mention of the unbelievable incompetence of the Oklahoma City Police Department Crime Lab, who handled the DNA. Joyce Gilchrist, who oversaw the specific lab that processed the DNA, was actually fired for her blatant manipulation of evidence in multiple cases to secure false convictions. There is no discussion of why the sketch constructed based on eyewitness testimony looks nothing like Anthony Sanchez. There is no discussion of why there were so many fingerprints (upwards of 40) in the car…and not a single one matches Anthony Sanchez. There is no conversation about the fact that even though Juli Busken was sexually assaulted…no DNA was found on her physical body. The DNA (allegedly, semen) was actually located on a leotard believed to belong to the victim but which she was not wearing when she was murdered. In fact, crime scene photos show her clothes intact. There was also no discussion of the footprint evidence…though they claimed Anthony Sanchez owned a pair of shoes similar to the print…they never pointed out that Anthony Sanchez’s foot was almost a size bigger than the shoe print. The bullet that was claimed to have been found…was found in an apartment that Anthony Sanchez was not living in at the time of Busken’s murder. There is no mention of the fact that Anthony Sanchez had at least six witnesses who said that he was nowhere near Norman on the night that Busken was murdered. No witnesses are brought forward to answer the question as to why the car was dropped off so close to Busken’s apartment…when Sanchez didn’t live near her apartment at the time. In addition, nobody is brought forward to explain why multiple other people have actually been fingered as the actual perpetrator. There is no discussion of the fact that Anthony Sanchez has maintained his innocence since he was first accused of the crime. Furthermore, I’ve actually talked to Anthony Sanchez and find his story to be convincing…and…perhaps more importantly…to have consistently checked out.

The discussion can go on and on…but the bottom line is that the case of Anthony Sanchez is far from the fiction that “Forensic Files” presents. In fact, I believe he’s innocent. I think you’d be wise to spend some time in the evidence before you make any conclusions. Surely, it’s important to remember that there is always a stark difference between television and real life…especially when a man’s life is at stake.

One of the lines in the show still haunts me. After the verdict, District Attorney Tim Kuykendall declared, “I hope they (the Buskins) can find some peace and comfort in knowing that someone will be held accountable for Juli’s murder.” Unfortunately, it seems that any old someone would do for Kuykendal and “Forensic Files.”

watch here: https://tubitv.com/tv-shows/447887/s13-e13-sands-of-crime

Politics and Religion

fresh writings

Thoughts

abolish the death penalty

Previous Post

October 29, 2022

Faces tell stories…and stories tell faces.: Save Anthony Sanchez! An Innocent Man on Oklahoma's Death Row

Next Post

November 4, 2022 A Petition for Scott Eizember (Scheduled to Be Executed in Oklahoma)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Danny & Jeff fresh writings latest poetics north texas fellowship of reconciliation Sermon theology from death row Thoughts Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 July 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 May 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Philip baptized the Ethiopian eunuch after explaining Isaiah 53 to him.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE