Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Religion News
100 Year Wait for Execution: Bryan Jennings & Richard Jordan

100 Year Wait for Execution: Bryan Jennings & Richard Jordan

Last updated on: November 12, 2025 at 9:48 pm by Jeff Hood

0 Comments

100 Year Wait for Execution: Bryan Jennings & Richard Jordan 2025-11-12T21:48:57-06:00 Jeff Hood

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Bryan Jennings

Bryan Jennings & Richard Jordan / Canva AI

Almost a Century of Delay: What the Cases of Bryan Jennings and Richard Jordan Reveal

Later today, the state of Florida is scheduled to execute Bryan Jennings, convicted of the 1979 kidnapping, rape and murder of six-year-old Becky Kunash on Merritt Island. Jennings was 20 years old at the time of the crime. Now, he is 66. If carried out, his execution will be Florida’s sixteenth of the year and among the longest-delayed executions in modern U.S. history…46 years from the crime to punishment.

Earlier this year (June 25), Mississippi executed Richard Jordan, the longest-serving death-row inmate in that state’s history. He was convicted of the 1976 kidnapping and murder of Edwina Marter. Jordan’s execution came nearly 49 years after the crime…a record-long interval between conviction and death. Together, the two cases represent nearly a century of waiting for the death penalty to be carried out. These staggering timelines reveal not the persistence of justice, but its decay.

The Meaning of Time in Punishment

Punishment derives its meaning from proximity to wrongdoing. Retribution depends on immediacy…the moral force of justice weakens as time passes. When the state waits nearly half a century to act, the link between crime and punishment dissolves. The world in which these crimes occurred…the late 1970s…is long gone. Society has evolved, the victims’ families have aged or died and the perpetrators themselves have become elderly men.

By the time Jennings and Jordan faced execution, they were not the same people who committed the crimes. Jennings has lived his entire adult life in confinement. Jordan, after nearly five decades in prison, was executed at the age of 79. To kill men so removed from their crimes is not an act of justice…it is an act of bureaucratic persistence mistaken for moral purpose.

Systemic Failure Revealed by Delay

These cases are not anomalies…they are symptoms of a death-penalty system collapsing under its own contradictions. Jordan’s death sentence was overturned and reinstated multiple times over the years. Courts found constitutional violations ranging from improper jury instructions to ineffective counsel. Jennings’s case has also dragged through decades of appeals, representation issues and procedural disputes.

This pattern of endless litigation is not excess…it is necessity. Capital cases must be scrutinized because they are irreversible. The legal system cannot tolerate shortcuts when a person’s life is at stake. But that very caution ensures that executions will be delayed for decades. The result is a punishment that is both too slow to serve its intended function and too cruel to be humane.

The Human Cost of Prolonged Waiting

Decades on death row constitute a punishment all its’ own…a slow psychological erosion. The condemned live lives defined by uncertainty and dread. Jordan spent nearly half a century in this limbo, enduring the deterioration of age and confinement before finally being executed. In Florida, Jennings now faces execution after nearly the same span of time, with many of his original advocates and witnesses long gone. For both men, the death sentence became a second slower death…one measured by decades in prison rather than moments of freedom.

The Death Penalty’s Fatal Contradiction

The modern death penalty cannot survive its own logic. To be fair, it must be slow and meticulous…to be meaningful, it must be swift. It can be neither. The nearly one hundred years of combined delay between the crimes of Jennings and Jordan and their executions demonstrates the irreconcilable tension at the heart of capital punishment.

If the state acts quickly, it risks executing the innocent. If it acts cautiously, it condemns people to decades of psychological torture. The system’s attempts to balance these imperatives lead to neither justice nor mercy…only an unending process that consumes time, money and lives without restoring moral order.

A Call for Abolition: What’s the point of executing Bryan Jennings?

The death of Bryan Jennings will not…and the death of Richard Jordan did not…vindicate justice…they expose its’ exhaustion. When a system takes forty-six and forty-nine years, respectively, to conclude its most severe punishment, it is not functioning…it is limping toward irrelevance. These executions do not deter crime, provide closure or affirm moral order. They simply allow the state to stubbornly and irrationally finish what it started decades ago, long after any meaningful connection between act and punishment has dissolved.

Almost a century of combined delay between two executions reveals the death penalty’s core absurdity. A system that must spend decades inflicting psychological suffering (on both the condemned and the victim’s family) in order to reach the moment of death has already forfeited its moral legitimacy. The death penalty does not express justice…it embodies the failure of justice itself.

The truth is that a state willing to kill after half a century has lost sight not only of mercy…but of meaning. There is no justice in an execution that takes longer than a human lifetime to arrive. What it shows is a government trapped by its own machinery…unable to admit that death is not justice, that vengeance is not healing and that violence cannot redeem violence. The nearly one hundred years between the crimes of Bryan Jennings and Richard Jordan and their scheduled/completed executions prove that the death penalty is not a solution but a symptom of a justice system unable to evolve. A humane society should not measure its strength by how long it can keep a person alive before killing him. It should measure its strength by its capacity to end killing altogether.

Catholic

Politics and Religion

Richard Gerald Jordan

Previous Post

November 11, 2025

Dr. Jonathan Groner and the Anatomy of an Execution

Next Post

November 14, 2025 Luigi Mangione and the Presumption of Innocence

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"'God’s Sheep on the Sidewalk' is immensely thought-provoking and conscience-stirring. Thanks. "The people out there ..."

Dr.Cajetan Coelho

God’s Sheep: The Ones Who Sleep ..."

"Greetings, Jeff, and bless you for your relentlessly regular fierce posts and your profound commitments ..."

DCF

Between: On the Person and Character ..."

"God as the Between, thoughts:As a child we were taught, in the blue or green ..."

madalyn baumstark

Between: On the Person and Character ..."

"Sometimes we make it harder than it is. Not saying things don't bring us to ..."

Patrick Dennis

Get Behind Me, Satan: A Death ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Danny & Jeff fresh writings latest poetics north texas fellowship of reconciliation Sermon theology from death row Thoughts Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 July 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 May 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who baptizes Jesus?

Select your answer to see how you score.

God the Father John the Baptist Joseph Joshua