Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Religion News
Being Adopted Should Bar A Death Sentence

Being Adopted Should Bar A Death Sentence

Last updated on: November 20, 2025 at 1:16 pm by Jeff Hood

0 Comments

Being Adopted Should Bar A Death Sentence 2025-11-20T13:16:31-06:00 Jeff Hood

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Canva AI

Why Adoption-Related Mitigation Should Prevent the Execution of Richard Barry Randolph (now Malik Abdul-Sajjad)

Capital punishment is supposed to be reserved for the most morally culpable offenders…people whose actions reflect a fully developed capacity for judgment and responsibility. That is precisely why the law requires that all mitigating evidence be weighed before a death sentence can be imposed. In Richard Barry Randolph (now Malik Abdul-Sajjad)’s case (Florida Execution / November 20, 2024), the context of his adoption and early development is not a side note but a crucial window into the formative experiences that shaped him long before he had any power to alter the course of his life. Understanding those experiences does not excuse wrongdoing, but it does explain why execution is not an appropriate or just outcome for someone who has been adopted.

Early Loss and Its Lasting Psychological Impact : Being Adopted Should Bar A Death Sentence

Adoption is, at its core, an act of care. It gives children families, stability and love. But many adopted individuals arrive in their new families already carrying deep wounds from their earliest days…loss, instability or trauma that occurred before adoption ever offered its chance at healing. These early ruptures in attachment can imprint themselves on the brain in ways that persist throughout life. Neuroscientists have documented how early trauma, especially trauma that occurs before a child can speak, disrupts the stress response system and reshapes emotional development. Even when an adoptive home is supportive, those early disruptions can leave behind emotional vulnerabilities that never fully disappear.

Randolph (Malik Abdul-Sajjad)’s experience fits squarely within what research has long shown…the separation from a biological mother, even in infancy, can have lasting effects on a child’s sense of security and self worth. Most adoptees flourish with nurturing parents, but the initial loss remains a significant psychological event, one that can be amplified when the adoptive environment later proves unstable or harmful.

Adverse Adoptive Environment and Compounded Trauma : Being Adopted Should Bar A Death Sentence

In Randolph (Malik Abdul-Sajjad)’s case, the home into which he was adopted included physical abuse by his adoptive father and emotional instability from his adoptive mother. That combination can magnify early attachment wounds and leave a child with very limited tools for coping with fear or distress. When a child grows up in an environment where safety is inconsistent, the developing brain adapts in ways that prioritize survival over emotional balance. This can lead to hypervigilance, impulsivity, difficulty managing anger or chronic anxiety in adulthood. These are not moral failings. They are the predictable outcomes of early adversity layered onto an adoption context already shaped by loss.

The law recognizes that when a person’s psychological development is compromised by circumstances outside their control, their moral culpability is diminished. The death penalty…designed only for those with the highest level of blameworthiness…becomes disproportionate.

Identity Challenges Faced by Adoptees

Identity formation is another area where adoptees can face unique challenges. For many adopted people, especially those without access to medical history or information about their biological parents, there can be a persistent sense of uncertainty about who they are or where they come from. This isn’t a reflection of their adoptive family’s love…it is simply a natural byproduct of missing pieces in the narrative of one’s own life. That uncertainty can lead to fragile self esteem, difficulty with emotional regulation or heightened susceptibility to depression and substance use. These struggles do not begin in adulthood…they are seeded in childhood and shaped by forces entirely outside the adoptee’s control.

Mental Health Vulnerabilities Among Adoptees : Being Adopted Should Bar A Death Sentence

Layered onto this are well documented statistical patterns in adoptee mental health outcomes. Again, these patterns are not caused by adoption itself. They stem from the early life conditions, genetic factors and prenatal environments that often accompany adoption. Adoptees experience elevated rates of PTSD, ADHD, substance-use disorders and personality development challenges. These conditions are connected directly to early trauma and inherited vulnerabilities. When a defendant’s life history reflects these risk factors, courts have long considered them powerful mitigation because they directly influence behavior and decision making.

Lack of Biological and Genetic Information

One of the most significant issues in older adoption cases is the lack of biological information. For decades, adoptees were placed without access to their medical or psychiatric histories. That means many grow up with biological risks…genetic predispositions toward mental illness, impulsivity, addiction or emotional dysregulation…without ever knowing they exist. This lack of information deprives adoptees of the chance to seek early intervention or understand the invisible forces shaping their behavior. Legally and ethically, these factors must be considered when determining the fairness of imposing the ultimate punishment.

Mitigation Is Not an Excuse. It Is a Legal Requirement : Being Adopted Should Bar A Death Sentence

It is important to be clear that mitigation is not an excuse. It does not minimize the harm suffered by victims or their families. What it does is help the justice system determine whether the State should take a life in return. The Supreme Court has repeatedly affirmed that any aspect of a defendant’s upbringing, psychological development or personal history that lessens moral culpability must be allowed to guide sentencing. Randolph (Malik Abdul-Sajjad)’s adoption related factors…early attachment rupture, an abusive adoptive environment, identity instability and likely inherited vulnerabilities…paint a picture of a man whose psychological development was profoundly compromised long before adulthood.

Why Richard Barry Randolph (Malik Abdul-Sajjad) Should Not Be Executed : Being Adopted Should Bar A Death Sentence

Execution is meant for those whose crimes reflect the highest degree of intentional fully developed moral culpability. But when a person begins life with the emotional disadvantages that Randolph (Malik Abdul-Sajjad) did…shaped by early loss, trauma, instability and unaddressed biological factors…society cannot fairly conclude that he stands among the “worst of the worst.” The justice system bears responsibility for acknowledging the developmental realities that shaped him, especially when his life now hangs in the balance.

For these reasons…grounded in science, law and basic human fairness…adoption must be considered a primary mitigating factor when deciding death sentences.

Richard Barry Randolph (Malik Abdul-Sajjad) should not be executed.

Sources

Appelbaum, P. S. (2005). “Early Trauma and Brain Development.” American Journal of Psychiatry.
Gunnar, M., & Quevedo, K. (2007). “The Neurobiology of Stress and Development.” Clinical Psychology Review.
van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Juffer, F. (2006). “Adoption as Intervention: Meta-Analysis of Attachment and Developmental Outcomes.” Development and Psychopathology.
Howe, D. (2010). Adoption, Attachment, and Psychopathology. Palgrave Macmillan.
Brodzinsky, D. (2011). “Children’s Adjustment to Adoption: Developmental and Clinical Issues.” Child Development Perspectives.
Keyes, M. et al. (2008). “Mental Health Outcomes Among Adopted Adults.” Archives of General Psychiatry.

Catholic

Politics and Religion

capital punishment ethics

criminal justice sentencing

death penalty reform

Richard Barry Randolph

About The Rev. Dr. Jeff Hood

The Rev. Dr. Jeff Hood is a theologian, writer and activist who has spent years ministering to people on death row. As a spiritual advisor and witness to executions, he speaks out against state violence and calls for a society rooted in justice, mercy and the sacredness of life. You can read more about the author here.

Previous Post

November 19, 2025

Anthony Boyd Leg Lift = 19 Minutes of Conscious Suffering

Next Post

November 22, 2025 “Today You Will Be With Me in Paradise”: Christ the King

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"'God’s Sheep on the Sidewalk' is immensely thought-provoking and conscience-stirring. Thanks. "The people out there ..."

Dr.Cajetan Coelho

God’s Sheep: The Ones Who Sleep ..."

"Greetings, Jeff, and bless you for your relentlessly regular fierce posts and your profound commitments ..."

DCF

Between: On the Person and Character ..."

"God as the Between, thoughts:As a child we were taught, in the blue or green ..."

madalyn baumstark

Between: On the Person and Character ..."

"Sometimes we make it harder than it is. Not saying things don't bring us to ..."

Patrick Dennis

Get Behind Me, Satan: A Death ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Danny & Jeff fresh writings latest poetics north texas fellowship of reconciliation Sermon theology from death row Thoughts Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 July 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 May 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

A Samaritan stopped to help a wounded man after a priest and a Levite passed by. Where was the man traveling from and to?

Select your answer to see how you score.

From Galilee to Judea From Jerusalem to Jericho From Bethany to Jerusalem From Samaria to Nazareth