Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
at the intersection of Creationism and Theistic Evolution

at the intersection of Creationism and Theistic Evolution

Last updated on: December 21, 2018 at 5:23 pm by Rev. Jared V. Ingle

at the intersection of Creationism and Theistic Evolution 2018-12-21T17:23:10-05:00 Rev. Jared V. Ingle

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

We now turn slightly away from the discussions about a view of persons and the imago Dei.[1] This set of readings addresses the issue of God’s involvement in the creation processes, particularly in the works of Christopher Southgate and John Jefferson Davis.[2]

JVI | horse mask or missing link? | 10.31.18

More than likely, most of my readers will lean one way or the other. The ones who I know personally will more than likely lean toward Biblical creationism, or even scientific creationism, as I do.

However, for one course I had to wade deep into the waters with Christian scientists who may hold a Biblical view to the best of their ability, and yet wrestle with ways to invite God to their workplace. They are reverent, while attempting to leave the door open for God to operate through secondary (evolutionary) means, if that is what God chooses.

On some points, I do not find very much common ground. On the other hand, I do not have an “us vs. them” mentality either. I have found that there are many good Christians in this field, and that there seems to be more than enough room for God at the table, when discussing creation and/or human origins.

Creationism and Theistic Evolution

Both Davis and Southgate explore the creation account, delineating a view of man created in God’s image, imago Dei. Likewise, both consider questions of science, physics, and quantum physics that open the door for dialogue about the existence of God.

In modern times, Southgate shares seven questions central to science and religion:

First, how important is science to a theology of creation? . . . Second, how does God act in the world? . . . Third, what is God’s relationship to time? . . . Fourth, what does the theology of creation mean for our care of the environment? . . . Fifth, how does the theology of creation relate to a theology of new creation? . . . Sixth, what is the importance of the Trinity for the theology of creation? . . . Seventh, what is the significance of human beings in creation?[3]

Although Southgate does not explore these questions in depth, he does offer a brief description of each and the significant strains of thought associated with them. At first, Southgate’s perspective seems to be heavily Theological. As the book progresses, he turns more to science, exploring theories, and pointing out ways that God can be invited to the table.

i. Anomalies

One of the ways Southgate opens the door for Theological discussion is by exploring anomalies. Early on he cites the example of the human eye. “How could one doubt that the human eye had been made to see with? Not until Darwin did that rhetorical question lose its force, and even Darwin confessed that he shivered whenever he thought of the eye.”[4]

Southgate eventually returns to anomalies, particularly in quantum mechanics, which are unexplainable by science. “By the early 1920’s then anomalies had grown into a gaping hole in the fabric of physics.”[5] Southgate reviews these anomalies and postulates that there might be a transcendent world observer, a divine mind, or a divine observer who is at work in these quantum processes.[6]

ii. Ultimate Observer

Both Southgate and Davis review the Anthropic Principles, Weak and Strong. Southgate reports on the proponents of the Strong Anthropic Principle (S.A.P.), who basically assume that something in the universe has allowed for life to develop, called the Ultimate Observer.

“Intelligent life-forms have cosmological significance by virtue of their future capacity to understand and manipulate matter on a cosmic scale.” In other words, scientifically speaking, this theory makes room for a Creator.[7] Davis explains the S.A.P., “The universe is governed by a teleological, life directed principle that ensures that the basic physical requirements of human life are met.”[8]

Another way that God is invited into the conversation is either through the theory of God as an Intelligent Designer or as a God of the Gaps. Southgate points out a number of ways the universe is so “fine-tuned” that any changes would be catastrophic. Whether one buys into the Biblical account of Creation or a form of the Big Bang, it is impossible to conceive of the world coming into existence without Divine aid. Davis explores the Weak Anthropic Principle (W.A.P.) at length and ties Intelligent Design into it.

Davis explains the “Theory of Everything” that scientists are searching for. Apparently, if everything can be explained, then there is no need for a transcendent being. In response, physicist James Trefil simply asks, “Who made the laws of logic? . . . there will always be room for religious faith and for a religious interpretation of the physical world.”[9]

iii. Creationism and Theistic Evolution

In conclusion, both Southgate and Davis develop a strong theological understanding, particularly of man as one created in the image of God, imago Dei.

Both espouse free will over determinism and predestination.

Both openly explore metaphysical questions in light of modern science.

As far as integration, Southgate develops a strong Theology, then shifts to views of science that merely make room for the question of God. On a couple of occasions, Davis does not use science to explain Theology, but as a means of illustrating it.

Both Southgate and Davis suggest types of Theistic evolution, i.e. God used secondary processes to create life and allow it to evolve.

It is disheartening that scientific creationism is not even explored.

notes:

[1] Other articles in this series so far:

Toward a Biblical Concept of Personality

On Holism, Holiness, and Wholeness

The Image, the Body, and Renewal

On the Mystery of Spirit and Salvation

The Regeneration of the Soul

Motivation and the Will

External Factors of Personality

Developing a Biblical View of Persons

The Human Person: the imago Dei and biotechnology

[2] Jared V. Ingle, “God and Physics: Exploring the Thought of Christopher Southgate and John Jefferson Davis” (paper presented in, The Human Person: Multi-Disciplinary Perspectives, Asbury Theological Seminary, March 6, 2011). [3] Christopher Southgate, God, Humanity and the Cosmos (New York: T & T Clark International, 2005), 57-60.

Amazon: God, Humanity and the Cosmos

[4] Ibid., 76. [5] Ibid., 130. [6] Ibid., 135. [7] Ibid., 145. [8] John Jefferson Davis, The Frontiers of Science and Faith: Examining Questions from the Big Bang to the End of the Universe (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2002), 131.

Amazon: The Frontiers of Science and Faith

[9] Ibid., 32.

Previous Post

December 18, 2018

Father of Eternity

Next Post

December 24, 2018 Jesus Christ is the Prince of Peace

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Communion Cruz Ingle Crystal Ingle Early Church Engaging Culture Ethics & Society Family Formation History In Dialogue Jared & Crystal Kingdom of God Majority World Church Mateo Ingle Messenger College Mission Narrative Pentecostal Church of God Prayer Shepherding The Sermon The Writings Theology Theology & Psychology Traverse City Uncategorized Vernell Ingle Word Study

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 May 2017 March 2017 March 2014 February 2013 January 2013 October 2012 July 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 August 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In what city was Jesus born?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jerusalem Nazareth Bethlehem Rome