Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

jappersandjanglers

Love Streams: What Film is For

Last updated on: July 18, 2026 at 11:59 am   by Chase Padusniak

0 Comments

Love Streams: What Film is For 2026-07-18T11:59:26-04:00 Chase Padusniak

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

John Cassavetes and Gena Rowlands
Source: Flickr user Jon Rubin
License

In a TV documentary about the production of Love Streams (1984), writer-director John Cassavetes says most movies bore him. He has, he confesses, no interest in entertainment, in being pacified. A one-off about “pizzazz” and “adding more to keep the audience interested” briefly turned my mind to “second-screen writing” now so common for streaming services. Cassavetes would hate what film has become (and hated what it was then). Love Streams, probably his last great work, demonstrates this disdain admirably.

I first saw the movie when I was too young (many such cases). At that age, no matter my perceived maturity, I still wore graphic t-shirts with crude jokes on them, or, if a little late, slim fit Forever 21 cardigans. I wanted entertainment, even if I didn’t know it. Of course, I knew I was supposed to like the movie, and I did. Whatever that meant to be me at the time. But I found it confusing, impressionistic. Really, too much like life.

In the same documentary, Cassavetes’ wife Gena Rowlands, who also plays one of the main characters, says something a bit obvious for Cassavetes fans with particular relevance to Love Streams. She and her husband don’t think his characters are insane; they’re just looking for a way to love and survive in life. His characters may appear insane, at best eccentric, but they are no madder than anyone else. The older I get, the more this perspective seems like the right one to me.

In Love Streams, for example, we have two siblings: Sarah (Gena Rowlands) and Robert (John Cassavetes). He is a lonely writer and playboy, who seems to attract women with his sheer pathetic degeneracy. Thus, early on his harasses a club singer into letting her drunkenly drive him home. He falls down her stairs and wakes up, cared for tenderly by her mother. He gives his long-lost eight-year-old son beer and flies him to Vegas, where he gets drunk with prostitutes. Robert hates men, hates himself. He pushes everyone away.

Sarah faces a divorce. She’s been in and out of mental hospitals for years. She loves her family dearly, probably to the point of suffocation. She travels to Europe with dozens of pieces of luggage, shows up on her rich brother’s doorstep with nary a word. In her grief, she buys goats, ducks, miniature horses, and a dog named Jim. She thinks these will heal her pained brother. In a way, she is right.

There is no plot here, only two lost people who, in a lesser film, would form an easy opposition. Her loneliness comes from pouring herself out, his stems from holding others at bay. This is true, but it’s too simple. Their loneliness is mutually entwined and independent. We know nothing of their childhoods or their backgrounds—it’s all a blur, an indistinct muddle. You know—life.

Cassavetes understood this. So, the movie ends, ends with a parting, harsh rain, and jukebox lights. John Cassavetes, barely legible, streaked in color in a windowpane.

Catholic

Religious Art

Reviews

Documentary

Gena Rowlands

John Cassavetes

Loneliness

Love Streams

Seymour Cassel

Previous Post



July 14, 2026

Drunken Angel: In the Shadow of the A-Bomb

Next Post



July 25, 2026 The King of Comedy: Scorsese, Scorsese, Where Art Thou?

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Do The Right Thing was a terrible movie, with a terrible message, a man owns ..."

Frank Holzhauser


Do the Right Thing: What Can ..."

"NOT the experience of those who actually lived through those years. Let's not forget that.Too ..."

captcrisis


54: Let the Good Times Roll

"Your accurate assessment of where the Blockbuster and the studios have ended up reminded me ..."

Dave G.


Jaws: Ad Fontes

"Another Dementia experience: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLkbxNibXiLx_ak8IuhZiutd2Fxe7_KAon&si=VhOYNUIBV3CTlyDf"

Ame


Dementia: Silent Nightmare


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Culture Politics Reviews Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2026 October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 December 2020 November 2020 July 2020 May 2020 April 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 August 2019 July 2019 April 2019 March 2019 December 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Ecclesiastes teaches that there is a time for everything under heaven.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE

Related posts from Jappers and Janglers

Family

China Girl: Abel Ferrara’s Shakespeare and Broadway

Jappers and Janglers

Family

Return of the Living Dead 3: More than...

Jappers and Janglers

Family

Dark Night of the Scarecrow: Another for the...

Jappers and Janglers

Family

Swimfan: Forgotten Aughts Pleasures

Jappers and Janglers

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Religious Music and Entertainment

Old York-- Part Two

It is not however the Shambles or the walls, that are the...

Book III, Chapter 1: The Wonderworker (Matt. 8:1-22)

Book III, Chapter 1: The Wonderworker We now pass into what I've...

Pope Leo Addresses Peru in Lima Theater

Pope Leo has returned to Peru!  After a brief greeting from Peru's...

Forging the Romantic and the Gothic

I am working on the idea of forgery in history, the creation...

Lights in the darkness

Diwali is getting Hannukah-ed, the "Seventh Generation" principle and John Rawls, and...

Of peer review and source checking at Interpreter

  Certain critics of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints...

view all Religious Music and Entertainment blogs

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube