Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

jappersandjanglers

Happiness: Normal Monsters, Monsters Normal

Last updated on: March 29, 2026 at 5:37 pm   by Chase Padusniak

0 Comments

Happiness: Normal Monsters, Monsters Normal 2026-03-29T17:37:27-04:00 Chase Padusniak

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Todd Solondz
Source: Wikimedia user Nicolas Genin
License

Todd Solondz’ Happiness (1998) has a reputation. It’s bleak. It’s iconoclastic. It’s perverted. It’s simply “too much.”

I couldn’t disagree more. As always, Solondz is offbeat. Philip Seymour Hoffman, for example, plays a heavy-breathing phone harasser who sticks things to his bedroom wall with the results of his telephonic adventures. There are sex offenders, sundae-eating murderers, and Russian cabby sex pests. Dads buy magazines for kids for themselves. This is, again, Todd Solondz.

But the movie is, dare I say, beautiful. It’s not just a freak show, though it is funny. It is bleak, though I’d hardly call it depressing. Its essence is the normality of its insane characters. Maybe this sounds trite in our moment, but normal people are weird. Many besuited doctors and lawyers are freaks. Not outwardly, of course. But they are freakish nonetheless.

That, of course, is disturbing in itself—potential criminals around every corner. But there’s a hopeful side of the coin too: we’re all screwed up. To different degrees, yes. And not all in a criminal way. But I can’t help but bask in Solondz’ insight and generosity, his willingness to put “normal people” under the microscope to see what’s germinating.

Maybe that’s how we got here. “Normal” in the 90s, QAnon in 2021. Maybe, maybe.

Catholic

Religious Art

Reviews

Ben Gazzara

Happiness

Lara Flynn Boyle

Philip Seymour Hoffman

Todd Solondz

Previous Post



March 20, 2026

Undertone: Scary, Scary Sound

Next Post



April 2, 2026 Project Hail Mary: Kids’ Movie?

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Do The Right Thing was a terrible movie, with a terrible message, a man owns ..."

Frank Holzhauser


Do the Right Thing: What Can ..."

"NOT the experience of those who actually lived through those years. Let's not forget that.Too ..."

captcrisis


54: Let the Good Times Roll

"Your accurate assessment of where the Blockbuster and the studios have ended up reminded me ..."

Dave G.


Jaws: Ad Fontes

"Another Dementia experience: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLkbxNibXiLx_ak8IuhZiutd2Fxe7_KAon&si=VhOYNUIBV3CTlyDf"

Ame


Dementia: Silent Nightmare


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Culture Politics Reviews Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 December 2020 November 2020 July 2020 May 2020 April 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 August 2019 July 2019 April 2019 March 2019 December 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How was the New Covenant different from the Old Covenant?

Select your answer to see how you score.

It required more sacrifices It would be written on their hearts It was only for priests It abolished God’s law

Related posts from Jappers and Janglers

Family

Swimfan: Forgotten Aughts Pleasures

Jappers and Janglers

Family

Other Mommy: Jump Scares for None

Jappers and Janglers

Family

Death by Hanging: From 1968 to 2026

Jappers and Janglers

Family

Blaze: Flashes of Brilliance

Jappers and Janglers

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Religious Music and Entertainment

The First Eucharistic Controversy: Christ’s Real Presence

For Catholics, the Eucharist is the source and summit of the Christian...

What a Stop Sign Can Teach Us About...

How to Make a Decision When You Can't Hear God Main point:...

Archdiocese Hosts Military Marriage Retreat in Germany

RASTATT, Germany — The transient military lifestyle, with its frequent deployments and...

Minted in God's Image

Nearly every morning, I make the drive to Detroit with my high-school-age...

The Real AI Story Is Adoption Without Trust

Artificial intelligence has crossed a political threshold. It is no longer a...

Walking through History

  A new article, written by Jeff Lindsay and Gale L. Pooley,...

view all Religious Music and Entertainment blogs

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube