Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

jappersandjanglers

Materialists: Manhattan Psycho Meet Cute

Last updated on: June 16, 2025 at 2:25 pm   by Chase Padusniak

0 Comments

Materialists: Manhattan Psycho Meet Cute 2025-06-16T14:25:35-04:00 Chase Padusniak

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Pedro Pascal at Cannes in 2025. He’s really having a moment.
Source: Gabrielle Hutchinson Photography (Wikimedia)
License

The way I see it, there are four ways to explain my reaction to Celine Song’s sophomore effort, Materialists (2025):

3) is out for personal reasons. 4) seems possible, though, if it is “for someone,” I can only pray they rediscover the experience of subjectivity at some point. That leaves us with 1) and 2).

Song stitches the shell together from carapaces  of rom coms past. Her list of influences says as much. Dakota Johnson plays a woman (Lucy) with no personality who works at a high-end matchmaking service in Manhattan. At the wedding of two of her clients, she meets Harry (Pedro Pascal) a charming “10 out of 10” who works in private equity (or was it hedge funds? Is there a difference?). Just as she flatly shares her favorite drink combination with Harry, the waiter plops a beer and a coke down on the table. He is her ex, an immiserated theater actor named John (Chris Evans), who refills water glasses at fancy dinners when he runs out of off-off-Broadway stipend money. The plot, I’d hazard a guess, suggests itself to you from there.

Lucy, who believes in money, power, and (my read here) Satan’s supremacy over all things worldly, brings a Moneyball (2003) edge to the dating game. What she learns, dear reader, is that love is messy and does not necessarily submit itself to quantification. Sometimes, you just need to let your hair down and dance the night away.

Fair enough. That’s a moral I can get behind. What made less sense to me was Song’s way of getting there. Every character in Materialists speaks with no guile. They are somehow both completely emotionally available and stilted. I can only imagine it’s the total victory of CBT in the average Manhattanite’s life.

Witness: when Lucy traces Harry’s leg-lengthening scars in the middle of the night, they immediately progress into an entirely reasonable conversation about the benefits of having your legs broken and extended. Lucy says she doesn’t care. She just doesn’t love him. Oh, the passion. The tension sits thick, like the air humming around in a conference room while executives shake hands over a deal well made.

Everyone talks like this, which makes Lucy’s emotionally fraught reaction to one of her client’s being assaulted all the more shocking. But she seems more shocked than is warranted (how could a cold-blooded woman working in Manhattan not predict that setting up two people of vastly different ages on a blind date could produce something so awful?). I think that’s supposed to be the emotional center of the movie. It’s hard to say. I fell asleep three times.

With that in mind, let’s think about 1). Is all this stone-faced mysticism a criticism of contemporary dating life? A jab at the eponymous materialists? Entirely possible, though the film makes no attempt to get you there. Some human presence, someone looking in from the outside with even an ounce of humanity might have given the viewer some vantage point from which to make sense of this unemotive mess. In any case, I think Song thinks that she’s aiming at 1).

I’ve been mean here; I’m aware. So let me pay a compliment. This film is gorgeous. Shabier Kirchner deserves all the credit in the world for his entrancing shots of the City. The 35mm film looks phenomenal; the images far exceed the writing. That part—the matter that makes film “film”—that was for me.

Catholic

Religious Art

Reviews

Celine Song

Chris Evans

Dakota Johnson

Materialists

Pedro Pascal

Shabier Kirchner

Previous Post



June 9, 2025

The Dark Backward: A Freakish Touch

Next Post



June 22, 2025 If Footmen Tire You, What Will Horses Do?

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Do The Right Thing was a terrible movie, with a terrible message, a man owns ..."

Frank Holzhauser


Do the Right Thing: What Can ..."

"NOT the experience of those who actually lived through those years. Let's not forget that.Too ..."

captcrisis


54: Let the Good Times Roll

"Your accurate assessment of where the Blockbuster and the studios have ended up reminded me ..."

Dave G.


Jaws: Ad Fontes

"Another Dementia experience: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLkbxNibXiLx_ak8IuhZiutd2Fxe7_KAon&si=VhOYNUIBV3CTlyDf"

Ame


Dementia: Silent Nightmare


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Culture Politics Reviews Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 December 2020 November 2020 July 2020 May 2020 April 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 August 2019 July 2019 April 2019 March 2019 December 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does the Bible say about giving?

Select your answer to see how you score.

God loves a cheerful giver Never give Only give under pressure Give to get rich

Related posts from Jappers and Janglers

Family

Swimfan: Forgotten Aughts Pleasures

Jappers and Janglers

Family

Other Mommy: Jump Scares for None

Jappers and Janglers

Family

Death by Hanging: From 1968 to 2026

Jappers and Janglers

Family

Blaze: Flashes of Brilliance

Jappers and Janglers

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Religious Music and Entertainment

The Dangers of Gradual Accommodation (Winking at Sin)

Recently, the “law of gradualness” resurfaced during the opening of a weeklong,...

The Iron Gates and the Lion of the...

  Yesterday, I didn't finish my report about, well, yesterday.  So I'll...

Dolly Parton’s Last Song Wins Dove Award with...

Bluegrass band The Grascals, speaking on the red carpet at the 57th...

The Image: On the Horror of Capitalism and...

The Image Then went the Pharisees, and took counsel how they might...

Thoughts about Halloween

We are approaching the date of our new American national holiday: October...

Letters on Living the Faith by C.S. Lewis

Most of us met C.S. Lewis as a public intellectual. Mere Christianity....

view all Religious Music and Entertainment blogs

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube