Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Religious Music and Entertainment
Disappearing Accidents

Disappearing Accidents

Last updated on: July 2, 2024 at 4:46 pm by Chase Padusniak

0 Comments

Disappearing Accidents 2024-07-02T16:46:06-04:00 Chase Padusniak

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The things done in the dark…
Source: Wikimedia
Public Domain

For the last couple months, I have been reading Peter Weiss’ Aesthetics of Resistance (1971-1981) alongside others with a penchant for self-flagellation. It’s a mammoth, paragraph-less, three-volume novel set in late 30s Germany, populated with long-forgotten Communist intellectuals, featuring excurses on, inter alia, the history of class as expressed through the Pergamon Altar, Stalinist show trials, the realism of Brueghel’s The Fight between Carnival and Lent (1559), and the ever-defeated attempts by the SPD and KPD to form a popular front before the full victory of rising fascism in Germany. And this all in the first 150 pages.

Above all, Weiss’ obsession with the troubled relationship between politics and art shines through. How does art relate to political action and historical progress? Can and does loyalty to a party or tendency dictate the boundaries of artistic expression? What role does art made entirely by slaves or peons have in understanding the trajectory and meaning of history? If we can’t see the broken limbs, the blood pouring from rent flesh, the all-eclipsing brain fog of the lowly artisans responsible for a statue of Hercules, how can we find them? And what does it mean to look?

I couldn’t shake these same thoughts as I recently watched two films by the notorious French-Greek filmmaker Costa-Gavras. In Z (1969) and State of Siege (1972), he takes two real historical events (the “accidental” killing of a Left-wing politician in Greece and the kidnapping and killing of an American USAID employee by revolutionaries in Uruguay) and fictionalizes them. He accomplishes a feat that I at least had never seen before. He manages to make the bare details of conspiracy and legal procedure exciting. His cuts are quick; he switches perspectives almost faster than a Game of Thrones (2011-2019) episode.

Anyone who has ever read a book about a political scandal or even a (dare I say it) conspiracy, knows how difficult it is to keep track of names and affiliations. We might hear “Tea Pot Dome” and think “real estate corruption” or Gladio and come up with “strategy of tension,” but the difficult work of understanding and developing the connections that make such corruption possible are totally elusive, that is, without a cork board or divinely suffused intellect. Costa-Gavras boils these connections down; he makes them available for our apprehension. Most of all—he does so in an engaging way.

This is one victory for art in the realm of politics: making the incomprehensible digestible without sacrificing any essential truths. In a way, this is simply the purpose of rhetoric: to persuade a listener of the validity of one’s case. Cicero speaks; Cataline is now perfidious. Costa-Gavras depicts an assassination; we understand the machinery of governmental and super-governmental corruption. We learn that prosecutors drop cases not because their superiors brashly threaten them but because they hear vague whispers of potential career consequences. You wouldn’t want to make the country look bad, right? Similarly, we see that counter-protestors might be true believers. They might also, however, be poor folks trying to get along, apolitical or barely politicized peddlers at the edges of society—those in need of a paycheck. The government can, they know, cover car payments. What’s a little violence then?

At the same time, I cannot imagine Z or State of Siege convincing a non-believer of its verity. Certainly not today. Without the knowledge that made it so moving for me, could someone appreciate it, be moved by it as more than a regular, ole thriller?

I don’t have answers. By design, this is a short and inconclusive blog post, a whisper to myself gasped outward at readers. But this question of art and politics, of the utility of each in the face of the other, continues to haunt me. I have a feeling it isn’t going anywhere.

Religious Art

Previous Post

June 24, 2024

The Movie You Can't Make Today

Next Post

July 9, 2024 Rockin' with Rod

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Do The Right Thing was a terrible movie, with a terrible message, a man owns ..."

Frank Holzhauser

Do the Right Thing: What Can ..."

"NOT the experience of those who actually lived through those years. Let's not forget that.Too ..."

captcrisis

54: Let the Good Times Roll

"Your accurate assessment of where the Blockbuster and the studios have ended up reminded me ..."

Dave G.

Jaws: Ad Fontes

"Another Dementia experience: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLkbxNibXiLx_ak8IuhZiutd2Fxe7_KAon&si=VhOYNUIBV3CTlyDf"

Ame

Dementia: Silent Nightmare

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Culture Politics Reviews Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 December 2020 November 2020 July 2020 May 2020 April 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 August 2019 July 2019 April 2019 March 2019 December 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Proverbs 31 describes the characteristics of a godly husband.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE