Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Religious Music and Entertainment
Which is the Original Bible? Is it the Catholic One?

Which is the Original Bible? Is it the Catholic One?

Last updated on: October 20, 2022 at 6:12 pm by Chase Padusniak

Which is the Original Bible? Is it the Catholic One? 2022-10-20T18:12:41-04:00 Chase Padusniak

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Which Bible anyway?
Source: Pexels

Anyone who has spent time on the Christian part of the internet knows that the participants from various denominations love debate. What’s more, they know that a favorite topic of debate—perhaps even more than whether Catholics worship Mary (maybe the Orthodox too, if it’s a particularly enlightened crowd—is the canon of the Bible. Protestants lament the Catholic fall from the foundational doctrine of Sola Scriptura. Catholics note that Luther expunged a few books from the Biblical canon, most notably the Epistle of James, the thoughts on work and salvation from which famously made the ex-Augustinian friar label it “an epistle of straw.”

But what’s often left out (and what makes matters even more complicated) is that there are others canons too: the Ethiopian Orthodox, for example, recognize 81 books (compare that to the Catholic Church’s 73!). Then you’ve got Assyrian Christians with their own canon (not to mention a relatively charitable attitude toward Nestorius!). Nobody seems able to agree.

It’s always been that way. Even the Church Fathers got into it over the Biblical canon. Possibly the oldest extant list of Biblical books, the Muratorian Fragment, lists the Apocalypse of Peter, a text now recognized by no major Church as canonical. Revelation is a particularly salient example. Eusebius, a Church historian of the 4th century, says that it’s both accepted and rejected at the same time:

But here it’s reasonable to summarise what has been done, the apparent writings of the New Testament. And the holy tetrad of the gospels must be arranged in first positions, which the book of the Apostles’ Acts follows. And after this, Paul’s letters must be counted, then next to these the earlier letter reportedly of John, and likewise must Peter’s letter be confirmed. On top of these must be added, if it should seem right, the Apocalypse of John [Revelation], the opinions concerning which we shall expound at the proper time. […] Among the illegitimate ones, let there be put down the book of Paul’s Acts, and the one called the Shepherd, and the Apocalypse of Peter, and in addition to these the letter reportedly of Barnabas, and the one called Teachings of the Apostles, and further still, the Apocalypse of John [Revelation], if it seems right. (quoted in Koperski, 4).

St. Dionysius of Alexandria (3rd century) regarded the work as of an inspired nature, but no by an Apostle and therefore not worthy of the canon. We owe the books inclusion in large part to a letter by St. Athanasius of Alexandria, who lists the now-common 27 book New Testament canon.

In the case of the NT, then, the criterion seems to have been “those works written by or directly connected to” an Apostle. This is sensible enough: if a text derives from the circle immediately around Jesus, then the odds are it has orthodox theology and is worthy of acceptance. The OT, about which there was also disagreement, presented a thornier problem, with Protestant Bibles returning to what by then was the accepted Jewish corpus. But for centuries before other texts had been used, both as inspired and merely edifying examples of Christ-anticipating literature.

In any case, the NT theory about Apostolic authorship has come under fire in the last century and half or so as scholars have disputed whether Biblical texts are really that old, of course. But that doesn’t bear on this question. We want to know if the Catholic Bible is the “original” one.

The answer to this must be “yes,” not just because I am Catholic (which admittedly makes me a bit biased, no?), but because “original” means “first.” The canon as we now know it was agreed upon by the Fathers of the Council of Rome in 382. These bishops represented the undivided Church, what we would now call the Catholic and Orthodox Churches joined together before the Great Schism. It is from this agreed upon list of books that the Protestant Bible descends from. Its own notion of canonicity is modeled on the Church Father’s commitment to Apostolic authorship of New Testament texts.

This may seem a bit unfair. Ethiopia, after all, came to Christianity long before Rome or Constantinople. And this is true! But what’s remarkable is the agreement between the canon from the Council of Rome and that of the Ethiopian Orthodox Church. The Tewahedo Church adds books, of course, especially various forms of apocalyptic literature. But the foundation is the same—it does not subtract from this “original canon,” but rather is more inclusive.

Insofar as the Catholic Bible is the basis of what we think of as “the canon,” that to which Protestant Bibles refer in eliminating certain texts (or labelling them merely “educative” and “wise” as the Anglican Church does), we may call it “original.” From this fount, the whole debate flows.

History and Religion

Dionysius of Alexandria

St. Athanasius of Alexandria

St. Dionysius of Alexandria

St. John

St. Paul

Previous Post

October 18, 2022

Pickleball! Pickleball! The Whole Dang Globe for Some Pickleball!

Next Post

October 22, 2022 The Total Stranger: Your Best Friend

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Culture Politics Reviews Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 December 2020 November 2020 July 2020 May 2020 April 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 August 2019 July 2019 April 2019 March 2019 December 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which king's prayer during a deadly illness resulted in 15 more years of life?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Josiah Hezekiah Solomon Ahab