Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Religious Music and Entertainment
Pickleball! Pickleball! The Whole Dang Globe for Some Pickleball!

Pickleball! Pickleball! The Whole Dang Globe for Some Pickleball!

Last updated on: October 21, 2022 at 1:09 pm by Chase Padusniak

Pickleball! Pickleball! The Whole Dang Globe for Some Pickleball! 2022-10-21T13:09:29-04:00 Chase Padusniak

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The Villages’ arch, which bridges the two sides of the development, split by a highway.
Source: Wikimedia

If you’re looking for a great documentary, look no further than Vice’s YouTube showcase of Valerie Blankenbyl’s The Bubble (2021). Put aside the true crime. Think about cults some other time. It’s free, folks. It comes complete with an interview with the director. You’ve got no excuse.

If you read the comments on the video, you’ll see that many are praising its balanced take on a situation so emblematic of the time in which we live that it feels foolish to even point it out. The Villages is an ever-expanding retirement community 50 miles out from Orlando, Florida, where Northern snow birds can make the migration complete, exist within, well, a bubble. They’ve got cul-de-sac on cul-de-sac, modern ranch homes, and well-manicured lawns winding around “town squares,” replete with all manner of shops nightclubs, pools, restaurants, and every other sort of amenity. They have their own newspaper, radio station (constantly blaring over speakers throughout the gigantic development), and even (illegally) have the public roads through the area gated. Time and again we meet residents who say it’s their time—they gave everything to their families and children and now it’s their chance to relax and enjoy life. These Boomers, in their own words, want nothing more than the freedom to exercise or not exercise, to drink all day, attend yoga ball drumming classes, golf, and sing karaoke by moonlight.

We also meet the residents of the surrounding rural area, at least those who are left. Some, like the owner of a combined gun and jewelry shop, like the Villages—it’s been great for her business (the old folks like to go to the range). Others, like an ex-fire fighter and tree nursery worker, resent the destruction of local wildlife, the sapping of the water table, and the destruction of the way of life so many have known for so long. One local woman exits her church to show us the gravestones of several relatives, doomed, should the Villages succeed, to meet the bulldozer, unless their skeletons are rescued and reinterred.

It is, in that sense, a balanced film. The director-interviewer is never hostile and hears everyone out. She lets the subjects speak for themselves, and never shies away from showing the old folks having fun, truly getting what it is they claim to want. That, compared to, say, a Michael Moore film, hints at a consciously “fair” doc, so just and weighted, in fact, that some commentators who live in the Villages call it well done!

But such a view ignores the astonishing cinematography and editing The Bubble has to offer. It takes the thing to be nothing more than its dialogue, mistakes the director’s (let’s call it) European manners for a lack of commitment to criticism. Take the opening scene. We’re in an evangelical church, swathed almost entirely in shadows, with some highlights on what’s more or less the apse (not that evangelical churches really have apses, but whatever, this reviewer has the background and vocabulary he does). The preacher winds back and forth, voice modulating up and down, captivating his audience of retirees. We cut to their faces over and over, fixed with rapt attention. He jokes about their finally getting away from the snow, the stress, the fast-paced way of life up North, the old house and troublesome family, how now they can drink margaritas all day. But, he adds, “you can only down so many drinks. Maybe your relationship with God has suffered; now you have a chance to fix that!” Inspiring! But if we look closely (the camera is fixed behind him as he wanders up and down the aisle) we see a board, high up, behind the audience. This board has the pastor’s notes, down to the “AND THAT’S GREAT!!” in reference to their taking on the slower, Floridian life. It suggests that the entire experience is manufactured, that this is really a bubble, a constructed experience meant to hide the world, infinitely duplicable until the world itself blazes out or old people decide they’d like to retire in some other way. Of course, the denizens of the Villages don’t care—that’s what they want. But the camera is insistent: you cannot escape the artifice of this place. What seems genuine, what may be truly emotionally affecting, is ultimately an act.

This perspective is clearest in the many, many shots of the houses in the privately-owned and -operated development. The cinematographer makes sure the green pops against the grey of the streets and homes, there like little splotches. The shots are almost always symmetrical, calling to mind the 50s ads for Levittowns. At one point, we get an impressively stark shot (also symmetrical, of course) of where a plot of grass meets a driveway. It looks like a Rothko painting, these bare rectangles of color clashing, evenly matched and always manicured. Blankenbyl constructs the suburbia of The Stepford Wives (1972) or Pleasantville (1998) without ever having to say it. The place feels like a fantasy, a reconstruction of the idealized childhood neighborhoods of the residents, updated with modern amenities and more contemporary activities. It equates these Boomers’ desires for fun and relaxation with a nostalgia, a desire to retreat into childhood.

Startling juxtapositions underline the point further. We see shots of butterflies and other bugs flying and landing on various leaves and flowers, all on or around the property of one of the Villages’ opponents. What do we cut to but a resident of the development asking why they even have window screens. There are no bugs in the Villages. “What’s a mosquito?” she asks sarcastically.

The Villages gets away with what it does because, as it turns out, the developers are major GOP donors and the residents (who vote as a bloc) are staunch Republicans (we see a Trump golf cart parade protested by one, lone Biden voter). They alone can elect representatives, independent of the rest of the county, at least in one local’s estimation. They have clout and the others don’t. The water table will collapse. Sink holes will keep on popping up (or sinking down). The 150,000+ population of the Villages will grow and grow. No one seems able to stop it. And the movie makes no attempt to assure us that anyone will, though we meet noble opponents of this future during its 92-minute runtime.

Above all, that’s the key to The Bubble—a willingness to rediscover the anti-developer movie. We got these all the time in the 90s. My own memories of childhood are replete with the image, not least because of Hey Arnold! The Movie (2002), in which the titular character and a multiethnic coalition of neighbors find a way to stop a Robert Moses stand-in. These days, developers are more popular “on the Left,” with anyone suspicious of them labelled a “NIMBY.” But, in my eyes, there’s a difference between simply fearing change or being xenophobic and watching your community get torn apart by speculation. Anyone living in a post-industrial town or city knows the phenomenon of luxury apartment buildings, cookie cutter boxes assembled with Legos (seriously, see how they’re made), with maybe (if you’re lucky) a few (still pricy) “low income” apartments on offer.

Of course, these edifices are not the Villages, and it’s not exactly the same problem. But just to see a documentary in which the wisdom of development is called into question, and to do so with style—that means the world to me (even if the world is getting destroyed in the process).

Recreation, Outdoors and Religion

Previous Post

October 15, 2022

The World Hates Clowns; Clowns Hate the World

Next Post

October 20, 2022 Which is the Original Bible? Is it the Catholic One?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Culture Politics Reviews Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 December 2020 November 2020 July 2020 May 2020 April 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 August 2019 July 2019 April 2019 March 2019 December 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who taught Apollos about the gospel of Jesus Christ.

Select your answer to see how you score.

Aquila and Priscilla Timothy Barnabas Paul