Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Religious Music and Entertainment
Fact, Fiction, or Just the Way Things Are?

Fact, Fiction, or Just the Way Things Are?

Last updated on: September 6, 2022 at 6:03 pm by Chase Padusniak

Fact, Fiction, or Just the Way Things Are? 2022-09-06T18:03:42-04:00 Chase Padusniak

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The last days of NTSC abalog broadcast TV.
Source: Flickr

1998’s The Last Broadcast is a movie made for me. I am a staunch New Jersey supremacist. The film takes place in Jersey’s gorgeously desolate Pine Barrens. I adore true crime and shlocky 90s horror. The Last Broadcast is a (pre-Blair Witch Project) found footage movie about a murder carried out either by the Jersey Devil or a deranged occultist deep in the woods. I love a good mockumentary. This movie is—more than anything else—a serious mockumentary, a strait-laced send-up of TV true crime docs, complete with awkwardly shot expert interviews and dramatizations. And yet, I cannot recommend it. Not as anything more than a historical artifact anyway.

The Last Broadcast is most commonly compared to 1999’s The Blair Witch Project. We have young people going into the woods to investigate some paranormal phenomenon they take seriously only insofar as it might supercharge their own careers. But that’s about where the similarities end. In the more famous film, we see the footage left behind by the murdered filmmakers; in The Last Broadcast we see snippets of this footage, but entirely circumscribed by commentary, interviews, and narration. We’re watching a movie posing as a classic TV documentary, not an indie stitching-together of surreal video held together by nothing more than the tension of the subjects’ journey. The Last Broadcast, in other words, has no real dramatic arc; it doesn’t have much to offer besides continual breadcrumbs that, we are promised, might lead us to see the whole situation differently. But the ending is an awful twist. I’m talking The Village (2004) level stuff. Whatever is good in the movie is undone by the last 10 minutes. Horrible. Tripe. Malevolent. Stupid.

In order to obviate against this deficiency, directors Stefan Avalos and Lance Weiler introduce social commentary. Our narrator and the filmmaker within the film, David Leigh (David Beard) doesn’t just investigate the murder of three public-access TV show makers; he pins the wrongful conviction of the supposed murderer and fourth member of the team, Jim Suerd (James Seward) on the media and their coverage of the trial. Further, he hints that the victims had it coming, at least to some degree. They were, in varying ways, fame obsessed, willing to do whatever it took to become successful in media. They went out into the woods to do a live simulcast on TV, the radio, and the (as yet young) internet, because they needed to be at the center of everything.

I want this to be a critique of a then-unborn social media, of the parasite that is our now universal desire for fame before the eyes of the imagined gormless masses. I want it to be a mirror into our broken souls pitched at the moment just before they were irrevocably shattered (not that all was well before). And that’s there. But it misses the mark. A bit of digging after watching the movie suggested to me why this might be. Weiler has gone on to be named to two World Economic Forum steering committees—one on the future of “content creation” and the other on digital policy. Avalos has gone on to deal with A.I. in cinema. The Last Broadcast certainly presages their interest in tech (it was the first movie shot, edited, and screened via purely digital means at Cannes). I haven’t seen their other work; it might be phenomenal. But it’s difficult for me not to discern in the movie’s missteps the directors’ futures.

The biggest proponents of A.I. apocalypticism are, after all, tech billionaires like Peter Thiel and Elon Musk. Tech CEOs build isolated bunkers they imagine will protect them from the climate catastrophe they themselves have had a major hand in. They proscribe the use of tablets and other digital hardware by their own children, even as they push them on the world. It’s not that their warnings are wrong: A.I. is terrifying, kids do spend too much time online (we all do). But there’s a blindness to these opinions, an inability to reckon with the system in which tech leaders participate. The Last Broadcast seems to lose its way in about the same place. It promises scares but delivers a documentary. It swears by true crime and yet turns to the outlandish by the end. It criticizes our obsession with fame and position while leveraging its own particularities to just that end. Put otherwise, it just doesn’t—can’t—deliver.

Technology and Religion

Previous Post

August 26, 2022

Wake Me Up When I’m Rock Hudson, then Kill Me

Next Post

September 30, 2022 Share a Can of Wine with Me?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Culture Politics Reviews Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 December 2020 November 2020 July 2020 May 2020 April 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 August 2019 July 2019 April 2019 March 2019 December 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Ruth was from Moab and chose to stay with her mother-in-law Naomi.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE