Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Religious Music and Entertainment
Words, Words, Words

Words, Words, Words

Last updated on: August 17, 2022 at 6:43 pm by Chase Padusniak

Words, Words, Words 2022-08-17T18:43:52-04:00 Chase Padusniak

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A lobby card for Billy Wilder’s Double Indemnity (1944).
Source: Jenikirbyhistory

At the beginning of Billy Wilder’s Double Indemnity (1944) Walter Neff (Fred MacMurray), a successful insurance salesman turned fraudster, narrates his undoing into a Dictaphone: “I killed him for money—and for a woman. I didn’t get the money. And I didn’t get the woman.” Wilder loved to bookend films with laconic summaries [who could forget Joe E. Brown’s final line in Some Like It Hot (1959): “nobody’s perfect!”]. Double Indemnity is a film noir, based on a James M. Cain novel with a script by Wilder and Raymond Chandler; in other words, it’s got a more hardboiled pedigree than a turn-of-the-century boxer. Noir makes us think of weak men, strong women, fast talking, and hard smoking. It’s that rapid repartee that, much like the Neff’s opening words in Double Indemnity, has always captivated my mind.

A well-crafted line delivered by the right actor can be what slam poetry can only pretend to be—what it must’ve been like to hear ye ole scop regale you and every person you’ve ever met with sagas about far-off lands. Lived poetry in other words, not just read from a page for its own sake, but a vital play of sounds, meanings, rhythms—and all else, making good, old-fashioned use of what is ultimately among our oldest tools: language.

Double Indemnity is full of just such moments. It’s final line (“I love you too”) is justifiably famous. Neff’s finished his dictation and his colleague the insurance adjuster Barton Keyes (Edward G. Robinson) walks in. Keyes and the little man in his stomach have felt something was off for some time. Now he knows what was wrong and why he couldn’t make out all the details: his best source was the fraudster. Neff can’t help but point this out: “Know why you couldn’t figure this one, Keyes? I’ll tell you. ‘Cause the guy you were looking for was too close. Right across the desk from you.” The sad Keyes limply shoots back: “Closer than that, Walter.” Neff drops the last line and Keyes, who’s had his cheap cigars lit by our protagonist all through the investigation, lights the dying cheat’s final cigarette. Those few sardonic words and that one gesture concentrate the whole film. And what happens between the Dictaphone sequences ain’t too bad either.

I couldn’t help but consider that emphasis on language (a major part of what codes films as “noir” for a contemporary audience—though some of the above is just Wilder’s wit) with the “soy dialogue” so heavily associated with contemporary cinema, especially the Marvel Cinematic Universe [MCU (see here for a recent—and refreshing—rant on the subject)]. Think the 80s action hero quipping after he rushes out of the flames. Think of the Duke Nukem being all out of bubble gum. Extend that to every character in every film, a constant ironic undercutting of any moment even pretending to seriousness, and you have an idea what I’m talking about. Joss Whedon is probably its most famous proponent. It often gets called “snappy.”

The thing is that Chandler, Cain, and Hammett wrote “snappy” dialogue too. So, what makes one irritating (have you noticed I find one kinda irritating?) and the other compelling, poetic, Beowulf-ian? A good answer would take a book, but this is a blog and ostensibly this is a film review. The unsatisfying, but satisfactory answer—the one I’ve been able to get out of the old noggin over the last few days of thinking—is humanity. The humor of a “snappy” line in a Wilder movie [or say in a movie like Ernst Lubitsch’s To Be or Not to Be (1944)] is variable, often sardonic, but not without a certain humanity. A mournful humanity perhaps, or a playful one. But the emphasis is on the gamut of human emotions, on the ironies that dominate and animate life. We humans have got language; life involves a hell of a lot of suffering and pain—may as well use what we’ve got to make it bearable.

Whereas with the Whedon-esque dialogue, we’re left with nothing but the gaping abyss. A character survives what seems an unwinnable battle, only to have any sense of the dramatic sucked away by a wry joke, or a gesture at the absurdity of the situation. Ironically, this undercutting makes the chasm at the bottom of the human experience clearer—it removes any sense of tension and leaves the viewer with nothing better to do than contemplate the emptiness of it all.

And that’s weird. Times are tough. You’d expect that Depression-era grit, not the distillation of 90s tomfoolery. But if you roll that carefree attitude up with nostalgia (as is so often done), I guess it’s distracting enough for most. For my part, I’d rather turn on a Wilder flick. And if I want Wilder at his linguistically wittiest, it’s Double Indemnity every time. No question.

Religious Art

Previous Post

June 29, 2022

Who Founded the Catholic Church?

Next Post

July 17, 2022 Content Warning: Wild Wild West

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Culture Politics Reviews Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 December 2020 November 2020 July 2020 May 2020 April 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 August 2019 July 2019 April 2019 March 2019 December 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was Melchizedek?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A Roman official A priest and king An angel A prophet