Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Religious Music and Entertainment
Content Warning: Wild Wild West

Content Warning: Wild Wild West

Last updated on: August 17, 2022 at 6:43 pm by Chase Padusniak

Content Warning: Wild Wild West 2022-08-17T18:43:34-04:00 Chase Padusniak

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

An 1863 image of then General Ulysses S. Grant. Not a drunk (or at least not more so than the rest of them back then!).
Source: The Library of Congress

As a five-year-old in 1999, I remember gawking at the Burger King tie-in toys for Will Smith’s newest movie: Wild Wild West. I didn’t see it then. Ever since (and for anyone not alive or otherwise unconscious in that year) it feels like a fever dream. A big budget action comedy in which steampunk Will Smith runs around the frontier trying to wrangle a legless Neo-Confederate Cajun who rides around in a gigantic mecha-spider? How could could such a thing exist? And yet the Good Lord provides.

That description makes the movie sound far more enticing than the product itself ends up being (somebody bring me on to do PR already!). Based on a 60s TV Series, this Barry Sonnenfeld directed effort is Shanghai Noon (2000) without Jackie Chan (and what could be worse than subtracting Jackie Chan?). It’s filled with flat jokes and half-baked gags, like in the opening scene when Will Smith, busy smooching a foxy lady in a Reconstruction-era jacuzzi, spots desperadoes on the horizon and, distracted, ends up making out with the air. The plot is predictable and sometimes full of holes (how does the train trap door work? Why does the bad guy drop his victims so close to his final destination—makes it pretty easy to catch back up, no?). But this is a late-90s Will Smith vehicle where the man himself raps the theme song—no one went for the compelling plot or the cutting-edge humor.

Critics and audiences felt the same way at the time. It lost money. Roger Ebert opened his review by calling it a “comedy dead zone.” But I, dear reader, have the benefit of hindsight. And with the benefit of hindsight (and not an ounce of nostalgia), I can say: “damn, I wish more big budget blockbusters were more like the absolute catastrophe Wild Wild West and less like what makes hundreds of millions at the box office now.”

You see, in some ways, the movie is not very reflective of its times. Based on an old TV program and languishing in development hell for decades, the movie is not pure Gen X ennui, nor is it some Clintonite post-political propaganda piece. Quite the opposite—Wild Wild West has a better read on US history than many Americans. You might even call it a Revisionist Western.

Hear me out. This is a movie in which a Black cowboy (a real and substantial group, though one rarely represented) who saw a runaway slave camp burned by a mixture of regular Confederate troops and Quantrill-esque heavies, seeks revenge on the assailants. His primary enemy, it turns out, is a former Confederate who is trying to not just reverse Reconstruction but entirely undo the result of the War. President Grant is played not as a drunk (as he is often is in the Lost Cause myth), but instead as a resolute opponent of secession and the Southern cause who will do what it takes to bring (relative) peace and equality to the US. There is not a single moment in the film that suggests the cause of the Civil War was anything but race-based slavery. It even opens with Will Smith punching a thug who’s about to call him the n-word. The damn thing sounds like Malcolm X when you compare it to our contemporary national discourse.

The irony is that many of the jokes are offensive by our standards. Smith’s partner Artemus Gordon (Kevin Kline) dresses as a woman on multiple occasions, creating space for some now tasteless gender jokes. Our hero even makes a few lynching jokes while facing death at the hands of a white mob (a mob he’s up against on account of the aforementioned gender confusion). The bad guy is in a wheelchair (and you know there are jokes about that). In a word: it ain’t exactly woke. But that’s what I find so fascinating (though I won’t quite say refreshing). If modern blockbusters are just “content” intended to do little more than multiply themselves and play on nostalgia while the world burns, then what do we do with a movie like this—one that failed so spectacularly and yet told the truth so (in)directly? Marvel movies, for example, are notorious for their mixture of social pandering (which I think one can call it even if one agrees with the aims of diversity and inclusion) and terrible politics. Ironman saves the world for the military industrial complex. Captain America is, well, Captain America. Wild Wild West is the opposite: flat and impolite in its sense of humor, but reasonably politically savvy for a major film. Content in its embryonic stage, Wild Wild West accidentally became something else—anti-content, a failure, a truth bomb in about every sense of that ridiculous term.

Now this isn’t one of those think pieces where I tell you to like a movie, no matter how awful, because it’s got the right politics. That sort of approach is artistically dishonest, like we’re supposed to treat Barry Sonnenfeld steampunk cowboy movies like examples of Socialist Realism. Rather, I think it’s worth pondering how such a film got made in the first place, and what’s changed in the last couple of decades. How did this big-budget bomb manage to get so much right, and why did the producers assume enough Americans would accept and enjoy its political stance? Above all, the point is that things must be really, really, really, really, really, really bad if Wild Wild West has me feeling wistful. Yeesh.

History and Religion

Previous Post

July 2, 2022

Words, Words, Words

Next Post

July 18, 2022 Tammy Does T-Rex

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Culture Politics Reviews Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 December 2020 November 2020 July 2020 May 2020 April 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 August 2019 July 2019 April 2019 March 2019 December 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What will happen to Satan at the end of time, according to Revelation 20:10?

Select your answer to see how you score.

He will be thrown into the lake of fire He will be cast out of heaven again He will roam the earth forever He will repent and be forgiven