Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Religious Music and Entertainment
Does What You Believe Affect What You Do?

Does What You Believe Affect What You Do?

Last updated on: October 29, 2019 at 6:30 pm by Chase Padusniak

Does What You Believe Affect What You Do? 2019-10-29T18:30:36-04:00 Chase Padusniak

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

It was not supposed to be like this. What do I mean? Back to Kant and his storied ethical consistency for the answer:

Enlightenment is man’s emergence from his self-imposed nonage. Nonage is the inability to use one’s own understanding without another’s guidance. This nonage is self-imposed if its cause lies not in lack of understanding but in indecision and lack of courage to use one’s own mind without another’s guidance. Dare to know! (Sapere aude.) “Have the courage to use your own understanding,” is therefore the motto of the enlightenment.

Laziness and cowardice are the reasons why such a large part of mankind gladly remain minors all their lives, long after nature has freed them from external guidance. They are the reasons why it is so easy for others to set themselves up as guardians. It is so comfortable to be a minor. If I have a book that thinks for me, a pastor who acts as my conscience, a physician who prescribes my diet, and so on–then I have no need to exert myself. I have no need to think, if only I can pay; others will take care of that disagreeable business for me. Those guardians who have kindly taken supervision upon themselves see to it that the overwhelming majority of mankind–among them the entire fair sex–should consider the step to maturity, not only as hard, but as extremely dangerous. First, these guardians make their domestic cattle stupid and carefully prevent the docile creatures from taking a single step without the leading-strings to which they have fastened them. Then they show them the danger that would threaten them if they should try to walk by themselves. Now this danger is really not very great; after stumbling a few times they would, at last, learn to walk. However, examples of such failures intimidate and generally discourage all further attempts. (“What is Enlightenment?”)

Enlightenment, which includes within it a rationalization (and possibly eventual elimination) of belief, was supposed to make each of us accountable to ourselves; we were to overcome “nonage” and take responsibility for our freedom. Freedom, however, has turned out to be a heavy weight. Unbelief has not saved us from our self-opacity, our disguised and deferred longings. Gott ist tot was, even for Nietzsche, a cry of horror as much as of possibility.

This is because Nietzsche understood the pitfalls.

I’m not sure we’ve ever quite recovered from this unexpected turn. Our world was to become more rational, less religious. And yet, here we are—mired in sin as ever. Many of us resent this reality (vide, if you will, reactions to Trump’s elections, the desired return to normalcy, etc.). And, as Nietzsche knew, this resentment can take a multitude of forms: intolerance, blind hatred, an unwillingness to admit our own inconsistency. Thus, we stagger on.

Let us go back, then, to Slovak Catholicism. Why is Slovakia—the more religious half of former Czechoslovakia—more tolerant? Perhaps because it is more agrarian; perhaps because it a formerly colonized margin and thus understands what it means to be outside the metropole. Perhaps Slovaks are just nice, pleasant people. And, yes, perhaps it is because Slovaks have internalized the welcoming challenge that is Christian orthodoxy. It could be any, a few, or all, of these.

There is a historical lesson here: we must be very careful when evaluating why and how other people took the actions they did. Few are Socrates; few are Kant. But there is also a lesson here for ourselves: we pray, I think, to see ourselves as God does, to know that we are loved, yes, but also to see through to our own hearts, to glimpse the whole that so often, when analyzed, seems like fractured parts. Whatever complete being we find in ourselves only begins with an admission of brokenness. Original Sin weighs heavily. And yet, we stagger on.

Previous Post

October 28, 2019

America's Fifth Great Awakening

Next Post

November 4, 2019 Dare We Hope That All Men Not Be Ideologues?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Culture Politics Reviews Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 December 2020 November 2020 July 2020 May 2020 April 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 August 2019 July 2019 April 2019 March 2019 December 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which empire conquered the Northern Kingdom of Israel?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Babylonian Persian Egyptian Assyrian