Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Religious Music and Entertainment
Does What You Believe Affect What You Do?

Does What You Believe Affect What You Do?

Last updated on: October 29, 2019 at 6:30 pm by Chase Padusniak

Does What You Believe Affect What You Do? 2019-10-29T18:30:36-04:00 Chase Padusniak

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I do not wish to argue that Catholicism is some panacea for racial resentment; that is obviously untrue. Rather, I am interested in exploring a question: why has, as some might expect, a loss of religiosity not correlated with a rise in tolerance, a spirit of welcoming?

There are some easy answers. Atheists need something to idolize: why not the nation? “Godless heathens” will do as “godless heathens” do. These, however, are insufficient. The Scandinavian countries are rather secular. And, while they are now exhibiting signs of xenophobia, they’re far from being wholly intolerant. It is clear that, like religious people, secular people may be divided and classified in any number of ways.

Some may give in to Nietzschean ressentiment. Others will be Canadian (so to speak). There is no simple line from belief to action, even if, we must confess, actions are conditioned by beliefs. Perhaps put more concretely: religious faith (or the lack thereof) is no simple indicator of one’s ethics. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: ideas don’t have consequences.

Put otherwise, human beings believe a lot of different, sometimes even contradictory, things at the same time. Few of us can lay claim to the aspiring consistency of Kant. We are animated by predispositions, childhood prejudices, adult over-reactions, and motivated reasoning. A Catholic may plainly see that Christ counsels uplifting the poor, may transparently note that God defends the widow and the orphan, and yet go on to support policies designed to keep widows and orphans in their place. Perhaps he does so because he believes, in some roundabout way, that Christianity requires small government; perhaps he does so because of a long-held dislike for the “other side” in American politics. The point is that adroit mental gymnastics are possible for any and all of us (and lest I be thought to be picking on the small-government conservative, let it be known that I think each of us—even those who try the hardest for self-transparency—do this).

I will go further: even those who claim to follow Freud, Lacan, and Foucault—harbingers of these ideas—enact them by refusing to recognize their own self-opacity. The Lacanian psychoanalyst must undergo analysis himself, but I’ve yet to meet a professed Lacanian who will reckon with what it means for everything and everyone he or she knows to be subject to cultural values and linguistic relationships that determine what they want and what they don’t want. We know with one mind and act with another.

Faith, however, does have a place in implanting these predispositions. He who grows up in a certain kind of evangelical church in the US may come to accept evolution later in life. But this acceptance may come with a burning hatred of “fundamentalism,” broadly defined. He may even turn to New Atheism, to Richard Dawkins and the crassest forms of unbelief. All of this, of course—the intensity and ire—is a manifestation of that upbringing. Why hate faith so much if your own childhood religion weren’t so facile?

Similarly, those who remain in certain denominations are shaped by them. The person who stays in that same evangelical church may carry with him or her a predisposition to distrust governmental authorities, may bear around certain ideas about guns, may even have their entire notion of “personhood” formed by this faith. And, were they to leave, it is not unlikely specters of these ideas would remain—silent, shifty, nevertheless present.

Go back Continue Reading

Previous Post

October 28, 2019

America's Fifth Great Awakening

Next Post

November 4, 2019 Dare We Hope That All Men Not Be Ideologues?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Culture Politics Reviews Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 December 2020 November 2020 July 2020 May 2020 April 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 August 2019 July 2019 April 2019 March 2019 December 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was Mary's cousin?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Leah Elizabeth Rachel Sarah