Donald Trump, Literature Lover

Last updated on: March 29, 2019 at 2:19 pm by Chase Padusniak

Donald Trump, Literature Lover 2019-03-29T14:19:08-04:00 Chase Padusniak

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Trump (Pixabay)

I’m no fan of Donald Trump. I wouldn’t say I’m in the #Resistance. My favorite candidates in the current primary are probably Sanders and Warren. I’ve got some love for AOC and mostly find the way the Democrats have chosen to do things over the last couple of years ineffectual, though they’ve achieved some modest successes—like their small victory in the midterms. Trump, however, tells us something about the actual nature of politics, something that the Dems have generally struggled with. Politics is a narrative art; it’s about spinning tales, myths, that people can believe in and act on. Capture a person’s mind and you mobilize him. As paradigms fail, they fade away.

It’s the art of storytelling that motivates the masses as much as anything else. The story doesn’t need to be coherent (very few are). The French Revolution was not a program, but a half-spontaneous outpouring of outrage centered on several key terms. Obama’s campaign is well known for its sloganeering. Ronald Reagan was, after all, a B-movie actor who knew how to play a crowd. Trump, for all his bumbling and basic incoherence, plays with language in a way that engages people. Call it “propaganda”; call it “mythmaking.” These can be distilled into images: the king and father God of the Middle Ages, the worker, raising hammer and sickle against a backdrop of wheat of East Germany. They can also be assortments of words and monikers: “low-energy Jeb,” “bigly,” “crisis,” “coup.”

These are the same sorts of stories that captivate us in literary texts. A book presents a certain world and asks the reader to engage it, to immerse him- or herself in it, to believe it and its parameters if only for a moment. Such tales can claim to be “realistic,” thereby informing how we think about the “real world.” They can be so patently fantastic that they, paradoxically, reveal the absurdities of our world, our lives.

Stories are, of course, thus dangerous. That’s why Plato suggested the poets be expelled from the ideal city:

And now we may fairly take him and place him by the side of the painter, for he is like him in two ways: first, inasmuch as his creations have an inferior degree of truth—in this, I say, he is like him; and he is also like him in being concerned with an inferior part of the soul; and therefore we shall be right in refusing to admit him into a well-ordered State, because he awakens and nourishes and strengthens the feelings and impairs the reason. As in a city when the evil are permitted to have authority and the good are put out of the way, so in the soul of man, as we maintain, the imitative poet implants an evil constitution, for he indulges the irrational nature which has no discernment of greater and less, but thinks the same thing at one time great and at another small; he is a manufacturer of images and is very far removed from the truth. (Republic Book X)

If one believes one way of being in the world to be true, one feels threatened by emerging, fake stories. As Aristotle tells us, these sorts of stories are the most dangerous in democracies, where the majority of people can be exposed to them, moved by them:

Again, the evil practices of the last and worst form of democracy are all found in tyrannies. Such are the power given to women in their families in the hope that they will inform against their husbands, and the license which is allowed to slaves in order that they may betray their masters; for slaves and women do not conspire against tyrants; and they are of course friendly to tyrannies and also to democracies, since under them they have a good time. For the people too would fain be a monarch, and therefore by them, as well as by the tyrant, the flatterer is held in honor; in democracies he is the demagogue; and the tyrant also has those who associate with him in a humble spirit, which is a work of flattery.(Politics V)

We don’t need to follow Aristotle’s taxonomy to see the basic point: stories can be used to flatter certain groups, convince them they’re right, and thereby mobilize them for action, perhaps ending in tyranny.

Previous Post

March 20, 2019

Secular Religion and Our Liberal Future

Next Post

April 11, 2019 Medieval Socialism

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Culture Politics Reviews Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 December 2020 November 2020 July 2020 May 2020 April 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 August 2019 July 2019 April 2019 March 2019 December 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What book famously concludes with God's compassion for a foreign city?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jonah Joel Micah Amos