Christian Materialism?

Last updated on: August 17, 2022 at 6:55 pm by Chase Padusniak

Christian Materialism? 2022-08-17T18:55:56-04:00 Chase Padusniak

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

And this is important. Why? Because it suggests that even Engels did not see “materialism” as merely the study of economic or other overtly-material factors in order to understand exactly how history would work out. Rather, he and Marx were interested in how changes in the material world exerted an influence on what we would call the long arc of history. This may sound banal, even obvious. But this is not necessarily how history was understood by people before and after their time. Take, for example, the “Great Man” theory of history, a Whiggish invention, holding that famous personalities predominantly affect historical outcomes. In other words, there is no America without George Washington, not French Revolution without Louis XVI.

There is, of course, some truth to such a conception, but it’s not the whole story. Washington was one factor in the founding of the United States, but many other things played a part: the spread of liberal political ideology, the massive distance between Britain and its colonies, the particular material arrangements of farmland that helped foster a sense of independence in the United States, the state of trade in Colonial New England, etc.

Similarly, many hold that history is effectively determined by ideas; we’re all familiar with this narrative. Richard Weaver blamed William of Ockham for the emergence of Nominalism (and thus somehow Protestantism and the Enlightenment—never mind that this ignores a variety of other historical factors like how those ideas were transmitted, their material availability, the political state of Germany in Luther’s time, etc.).

What Engels is saying, then, is that material forces must be taken seriously. Changes in technology, including changes in economic systems and the ideas they engender, do play a part in how history happens, the paths it takes. “Self-interest” may have only become a meaningful justification for actions with the emergence of capitalism (and the technologies that made it possible, including developments in shipbuilding, the breakdown of bonds of feudal fealty, the emergence of a predominantly money-based economy, etc.), to take only one example. Ideas change over time in part because the social systems and material conditions that make those ideas easy to hold change over time. These things come together in complex ways, made all the more complex by our freedom (something Engels acknowledges in the passage quoted).

Why do I bother bringing this up now? I bring It up in large part because Christians engage in certain kinds of idealism all the time. They’ll blame the decadence of the modern West on liberal political philosophy or (among Catholics and Orthodox) Protestantism. They’ll say that the acceptance of an idea like no-fault divorce spelled the end of the family. They’ll imply that somehow, if only we got these ideas out of their heads, we could turn back the clock (further implying that that’s somehow desirable). We get told that if we could only ban x or y thing or idea we could go back. “Change the culture and you’ll make us virtuous!”

But what if “culture” is a product of conditions both material and immaterial? What if we need to reckon with how smartphones, or global digital communication, or the emergence of skyscrapers impact our “culture” and sense of “community”? What if understanding and addressing issues like consumerism, commodity obsession, and individualism require thinking about the material historical conditions that made such things possible (like the emergence of factory technologies and the enclosure of common land hundreds of years ago)?

This is why I beg us to understand our multifaceted world “materialistically.” Certainly, one can go too far and be a reductionist (though it seems Engels was not). But our mistake today tends to be too idealistic, to simply look to changes in ideas to explain how things are now. This, however, leaves us toothless; we can do nothing but decry losses rather than reckon with history and harness developments in material conditions toward Christian ends.

To be a “materialist” is to recognize the power history has as more than a series of ideas; it is to take seriously change, giving us a chance to, guided by divine Providence, make our own history, to be God’s hands, as St. Teresa said long ago.

Go back

Politics and Religion

Previous Post

March 22, 2018

Eastern Christianity and Orientalism

Next Post

April 17, 2018 The Narcissism of Expectations

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Culture Politics Reviews Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2026 October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 December 2020 November 2020 July 2020 May 2020 April 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 August 2019 July 2019 April 2019 March 2019 December 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What physical affliction did Job suffer?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Broken bones Painful boils Leprosy Blindness