Desire and Its Discontents

Last updated on: January 9, 2018 at 1:40 pm by Chase Padusniak

Desire and Its Discontents 2018-01-09T13:40:24-04:00 Chase Padusniak

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Rod Serling ends the episode thus:

Street scene, night. Traffic accident. Victim named Fred Renard, gentleman with a sour face to whom contentment came with difficulty. Fred Renard, who took all that was needed – in The Twilight Zone. (IMDb)

One can look at this little piece of television in many ways. Pedott could be God. Renard could be an allegory for a greedy man. But what I propose is that Renard is each and every one of us. He is human desire.

What are his qualities? Discontentment, a lack of peace, a burning feeling that things ought to be going his way even though they aren’t. Renard doesn’t use the old man’s gifts as a step on the road to satisfaction; rather, he can only see the possibility of more, that is, of more desiring. Human desire wants to go on wanting; it’s really that simple. Think of St. Augustine’s “grant me chastity and continency, but not yet.” On the one hand, he does want to stop, but if he wanted to stop (in the strongest sense), he would. His profligacy must be giving him something or he wouldn’t keep returning to it. St. Paul says effectively the same thing:

Did the good, then, become death for me? Of course not! Sin, in order that it might be shown to be sin, worked death in me through the good, so that sin might become sinful beyond measure through the commandment. We know that the law is spiritual; but I am carnal, sold into slavery to sin. What I do, I do not understand. For I do not do what I want, but I do what I hate. Now if I do what I do not want, I concur that the law is good. So now it is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells in me. For I know that good does not dwell in me, that is, in my flesh. The willing is ready at hand, but doing the good is not. For I do not do the good I want, but I do the evil I do not want. Now if [I] do what I do not want, it is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells in me. So, then, I discover the principle that when I want to do right, evil is at hand. For I take delight in the law of God, in my inner self, but I see in my members another principle at war with the law of my mind, taking me captive to the law of sin that dwells in my members. Miserable one that I am! Who will deliver me from this mortal body? Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord. Therefore, I myself, with my mind, serve the law of God but, with my flesh, the law of sin. (Romans 7:13-25)

The spiritual-carnal divide is strong in this passage, and, from what I’ve seen, it’s often read in this way—the war within us for supremacy between the fleshly and the Godly. But that’s not all. If we look closely, Paul is contemplating how he can do what he does not seem to want to do. When he wishes to do good, evil is still present. This is not just to say that good intentions are not enough. Something more fundamental seems to be at work. He doesn’t say that when he does good things, evil is a consequence; rather, “[t]his willing is ready at hand, but doing the good is not. For I do not do the good I want, but I do the evil I do not want.”

What’s he’s talking about here is desire, human desire. We say we are willing to do what we think is right, but we do not. This must be, because, at some level, we want to do what we think is “bad.” One could take more mundane examples. I hate waking up late, but many nights I sit up doing virtually nothing, so late, in fact, that I can’t help but sleep in. I may tell myself that I want to be up early, and at some level that’s true, but something keeps drawing me back to my phone and my laptop late into the night. To say I don’t want to do that flies in the face of what I actually do all the time.

This is the sense in which desire wants to go on desiring. If satisfaction means getting up early for me, or doing the good for St. Paul, or being chaste for St. Augustine (my saintliness is really on display here), why don’t we chase satisfaction? We don’t because our desire doesn’t want to be satisfied. Of course, on one level it does; we all want peace. But, on another, it does not. It wants to go on desiring, to keep being unfilled, hungry, that is, desirous.

Go back Continue Reading

Previous Post

December 28, 2017

A Hermeneutics of Liberation

Next Post

January 9, 2018 Stewardship and the Temptations of Global Capital

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Culture Politics Reviews Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 December 2020 November 2020 July 2020 May 2020 April 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 August 2019 July 2019 April 2019 March 2019 December 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How old was Noah when flood began?

Select your answer to see how you score.

550 years 600 years 450 years 500 years