Tax Plans, Graduate Students, and Bearing the Burden

Last updated on: December 6, 2017 at 11:18 am by Chase Padusniak

Tax Plans, Graduate Students, and Bearing the Burden 2017-12-06T11:18:43-04:00 Chase Padusniak

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

It’s also likely to make life more economically difficult for graduate students in other ways:

The House bill eliminates several tax deductions and credits to pay for tax cuts and to simplify the tax code. It eliminates the student loan interest deduction as well as the tax exclusion for tuition reimbursement received from an employer. It scraps the Lifetime Opportunity Credit that benefits students enrolled in higher education for more than five years, but expands the American Opportunity Credit by one year.

“The current law education tax benefits are so complicated that they are ineffective because many taxpayers cannot determine the tax benefits for which they are eligible,” a summary of the bill said.

The bill also nearly doubles the standard deduction, which could make up for the loss of some other deductions. It raises today’s standard deduction for singles to $12,200 from $6,350.

But it’s unlikely the new standard deduction will offset the loss of tax-free tuition waivers for graduate students, which often exceed that amount. The bill also eliminates the $4,050 personal exemption you’re allowed to claim today for yourself.

Shih would see his taxable income raise to about $44,800 from $14,600 after taking those three changes into consideration.

“I think this tax change would discourage a lot of students,” he said. (CNN)

As one friend’s father (an accountant) put it: someone has to foot the bill. Put otherwise, someone has to bear the burden. The question is why it should be graduate students (on average not exactly a wealthy group—our career is often merely a way for disadvantaged students to pursue their passions)? The big winners, as per most analyses, are the wealthy:

Several elements of the tax bills would disproportionately benefit wealthy taxpayers.

These include the elimination of the alternative minimum tax, which requires that taxpayers with many deductions pay at least a minimum amount of taxes; the creation of lower rates for “pass-through” income, which covers business income that is taxed on a business owner’s personal filing; and more generous exemptions (in the Senate bill) or outright elimination (in the House bill) of the estate tax.

According to the Tax Policy Center analysis of the House bill, the second-highest quintile of taxpayers would see a gain of $1,610 — well above any of the lowest three quintiles — while the highest 20 percent of households would get an even bigger tax cut of $4,860 in 2018. That works out to about 1.9 percent of their income — the highest of any quintile.

The top 1 percent would do even better, saving $37,100 in 2018, or 2.4 percent of their income. And the top one-tenth of a percent of the income spectrum would see a cut of $174,620, or 2.5 percent of their income. (Politifact)

This is not to say that other brackets won’t see slight savings as well; they just can’t compare to what higher-earners will see. Graduate students, along with teachers and others, will be picking up the slack. Unless one is a true believer (in the strongest sense) in trickle-down economics, it’s difficult to know why it is that corporate interests should receive large breaks while low- and middle-earners get a little help (in some cases help erased by other provisions in the bill).

This is not the place for me to challenge those who really believe in the effects of trickle down (I think there are plenty of reasons not to believe it works; my own articles on politics ought to clarify my own position to some degree). All I can hope to do is to highlight one of the ways in which economic mobility may be limited by the bill; one of the ways in which scientific innovation may fall by the wayside.

But anyone who is familiar with this blog likely knows that “economic mobility” and “scientific innovation” are not my primary concerns. I mention these only to note that, even for pragmatists, this bill (in at least one version) makes little sense. For those who think like I do, who think less in terms of growth and more in terms of justice, it’s just another example of how a neoliberal drive for growth, allied in its own way with a desire to simplify things for people, can wreak havoc and lead the diminished to bear a greater burden.

On a last note, I must appeal to my readers as (presumably) Christians. I recognize that I am not “poor” (though my background is certainly not a wealthy one); I recognize that someone must always foot the bill. I have no illusions about the harsh economic realities that drive tax-code changes. I would just ask you to keep in mind the words of the Book of Proverbs, because even if it isn’t graduate students and teachers bearing the burden, we ought to think long and hard about who benefits and who loses. In short, we ought to consider, everywhere and always, what is just:

Open your mouth in behalf of the mute,
and for the rights of the destitute;
Open your mouth, judge justly,
defend the needy and the poor!
(Proverbs 31:8-9)

Previous Post

December 4, 2017

Freedom: A Vexed Question

Next Post

December 6, 2017 Byzantine "Advent"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Culture Politics Reviews Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 December 2020 November 2020 July 2020 May 2020 April 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 August 2019 July 2019 April 2019 March 2019 December 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Christian group is known for using incense during worship?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jehovah’s Witnesses Pentecostals Orthodox Christians Baptists