A Hermeneutics of Liberation

Last updated on: December 28, 2017 at 9:23 pm by Chase Padusniak

A Hermeneutics of Liberation 2017-12-28T21:23:03-04:00 Chase Padusniak

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Many people have tried to solve this problem. Without going through their various approaches, I think Christ gives us the answer: humility and charity. We can cleverly discern another person’s presuppositions as they relate to ours; we can disagree with them. That’s all fine. In fact, it’s necessary. But we can do so in a spirit of self-reflection, of assuming good faith (sometimes even in the face of bad faith). This is a hermeneutics of liberation.

I know; I know, being charitable, even seemingly foolish, when dealing with evil seems insane. Who wants to remain cool, calm, and collected in the face of what may seem sheer stupidity, malevolence, or both at once? But that is no excuse. We are called to be perfect as our Heavenly Father is perfect. We may trip; we may fall, but the struggle toward sanctity continues with the help of God’s grace.

All of that is to say that it’s up to us to “enter the circle” at the right point, to ensure that we are allowing the Holy Spirit to work through us in our interpretations of “texts” (words, actions, big-box stores, etc.).

This is all very abstract. I’ll give two examples: one personal (i.e. from my life) and another more-overtly political (though still rooted in concerns of mine, if I am being honest).

Recently, I had an argument with a friend, one of those silly, convoluted fights, in which you’re clearly talking past each other. I made a mistake, was well aware I had done so, and then received a sort of “talking to” from him (one of several over the last few weeks; I felt very condescended to). So when he called me to “chat,” I tried to be clear that I understood that I was wrong and was sorry, but wanted to discuss how he kept feeling the need to give me these “talking tos.” He saw this as an attempt to evade the real conversation. I raised my voice; he started leveling some (to my mind) overblown accusations. It wasn’t pretty.

This situation led me to see him as very stubborn, incapable of seeing that I wanted to talk about his treatment of me, what I saw as his condescending attitude. Eventually, everything was fine, but I should not have yelled, should not have assumed he was effectively trying to argue in bad faith by only being concerned about his side of the argument. I should have recognized what he was going through in that moment (some rather serious stuff) and weighed that as a part of my reaction. Of course, part of me still wishes he had been more open to discussing how I felt. That would’ve been ideal. But thinking that means “entering the circle” at the point labelled “I am the most important person here; my feelings are necessarily primary.” This led me to yell, to be unkind, to think and speak ill of my brother.

Another example might be stores open on Black Friday. I do not like the fact that people have to miss out on Thanksgiving so that other people can go shopping, which to me is simply a reflection of our rabidly-capitalistic culture and economic structure. I may despise certain chains for keeping people in sweatshops to sell still over-priced goods to ravenous consumers. I may find those practices totally unjust. But that does not mean I hate the people working (in fact, I feel bad for them). It does not mean that I hate those shopping (many of them need the discounts to go on living decently-comfortable lives; their tastes and desires having been shaped by the undying pressures of our economy and culture, I can’t help but understand their appreciating Black Friday). It does not even mean that I hate the CEOs and other executives at these companies, who, whatever their greed and ruthlessness are children of God with complex motivations, themselves shaped by capitalism. In short, entering at the “right point” here means keeping love alive in the face of injustice, believing that others can be converted through testifying to the truth in charity.

Go back Continue Reading

Previous Post

December 27, 2017

Japan's Martyrs and Confessors

Next Post

January 8, 2018 Desire and Its Discontents

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Culture Politics Reviews Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 December 2020 November 2020 July 2020 May 2020 April 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 August 2019 July 2019 April 2019 March 2019 December 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was thrown into a den of lions?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Joseph Jonah Daniel David