Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

jappersandjanglers

1054: History, Myth, and the Making of a Schism (Full Essay)

Last updated on: November 11, 2017 at 4:33 pm   by Guest Contributor

1054: History, Myth, and the Making of a Schism (Full Essay) 2017-11-11T16:33:23-04:00 Guest Contributor

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

However, in a letter to the Patriarch of Antioch written shortly after the document of excommunication, Cerularius does, in fact, go on to attack the entire Western Church in much stronger terms.  To begin with, Cerularius says that he has heard that Peter of Antioch considers himself in communion with the Church of Rome, and prays for the Pope during his Eucharistic liturgy.  Cerularius, however, takes strong offense at this state of affairs: “I did not think that anyone blundered such an ignorant oversight!” (Caer. Petr. IX).  For, according to Cerularius, from the time of the “Fifth Ecumenical ” (IX), because “Pope Vigilius would not attend at that Council” (IX), the Church at Constantinople has not prayed for the Pope during the Liturgy.  Indeed, “from then”—almost exactly five hundred years before 1054— “even till now,” Cerularius says, “the Pope has been cut off from the Holy Catholic Church” (IX).

This is an enormous and embarrassing inaccuracy.  As a matter of fact, Cerularius is trying to refer to the Sixth, not the Fifth Ecumenical Council, which Pope Vigilius did initially refuse to attend.  As Peter of Antioch was later to point out, however, Pope Vigilius did eventually agree to the Council and rescind his excommunication of the Patriarch of Constantinople, returning the two Churches into communion with each other and giving the Council its Ecumenical status; and another Pope had, of course, more recently participated in the Seventh Ecumenical Council, in full communion with Constantinople.  Indeed, the Churches had been in communion with each other for quite a long time in 1054, and had prayed for one another in their liturgies throughout this time.  According to Cerularius, however, the incident had not at all created a new schism: the two Churches were already in Schism by 1054, and had been for five hundred years.

Unsatisfied, Cerularius proceeds to berate Peter of Antioch for his belief that, besides the use of unleavened bread, the Western Church is completely orthodox.  As a matter of a fact, Cerularius says, the Westerners “are wholly lovers of falsehood and bad workers” (XI), “not spitted by one missile alone—the one about the Azymes, the one known clearly to all—but by many and diverse missiles” (XI).  Cerularius then proceeds to list the Westerners’ sins and crimes in a dizzying list of customs and theology.  Among their detestable practices are “that they eat things strangled, and that they shave, and that they keep the Sabbath, and that they eat blood, and that their monks eat pork fat […] and that on the first Saturday of Lent […] they fast from meat and eat only dairy, and that they eat meat on Wednesday, and on Friday they eat dairy and eggs, and on Saturday they fast the whole day” (XII).  Likewise, Cerularius takes issue briefly with the filioque addition to the Creed, as well as with the Western additions to the Sanctus, the practice of clerical celibacy, the Sign of Peace in the Liturgy, the wearing of rings by Bishops, the practice of baptism with one immersion and using blessed salt, and the practice of allowing two brothers to marry two sisters.  He accuses some Western Bishops of fighting in battles as secular lords, and Western Christians in general of refusing to venerate relics or honor the great Eastern Saints, and he also claims that “some of them do not venerate the Holy Icons” (XIV).  Given these manifold abuses and many others, Cerularius asks, “do they seem to those thinking well to be numbered with the wholly Orthodox?  I think not” (XIV).  Indeed, he points out that the only people who think that the Westerners are orthodox are the Westerners themselves.  Yet, Cerularius says, these are not the Westerners’ greatest sins.  Rather, their greatest crime, the one “graver and more insupportable than everything, and showing forth their insanity over and above everything” (XV), is the one exemplified by the Roman legates, “because they say that they arrived here not to be taught or to be argued with, but rather to teach, and to persuade us to hold their dogmas […] with authority and surpassing shamelessness” (XV).  The great sin of the West is arrogance.

Go back Continue Reading

Theology

Byzantine

Catholicism

Church

Orthodoxy

Papacy

Pope

Schism

Previous Post



November 10, 2017

What’s so Great About the Great Books?

Next Post



November 13, 2017 Finding Yourself and Other Half-Truths


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Culture Politics Reviews Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2026 October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 December 2020 November 2020 July 2020 May 2020 April 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 August 2019 July 2019 April 2019 March 2019 December 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Mordecai refused to bow down to Haman.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE

Related posts from Jappers and Janglers

Family

American Movie: The Beauty of the Chuds

Jappers and Janglers

Family

Conclave: Divine Thrills

Jappers and Janglers

Family

Apostasy, Scandal, and a Road Well-Trod

Jappers and Janglers

Family

Eden Undone

Jappers and Janglers

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Religious Music and Entertainment

Old York-- Part One

This was a very important city, all the way back to before...

"Utah saw the biggest shift toward Democrats in...

  You can watch the newest installment of Becoming Brigham here:  "On...

When You Can’t Ease Their Pain: Finding Christ...

I’m writing this article from my phone as I sit in the...

The Promised Land Season 2 Coming as Show...

The faith-based workplace comedy “The Promised Land” is entering a new chapter....

A Word On the 2026 Catholic Voters' Shift...

Let's talk about American Catholics, and their role in the earth-shattering blue...

5 Ways To Love Other People By Loving...

Is loving yourself selfish? Or is it one way to help you...

view all Religious Music and Entertainment blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube