We Are All Extremists

Last updated on: February 13, 2017 at 6:55 pm by Chase Padusniak

We Are All Extremists 2017-02-13T18:55:08-04:00 Chase Padusniak

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

(An American C-123 cargo plane burns after being hit by communist mortars while taxiing on the Marine post at Khe Sanh, South Vietnam on March 1, 1968. Originaly: AP Photo/Peter Arnett. Source: Flickr, posted by manhhai, attribution required).

Extremism is a popular topic these days. For the “Right,” it’s of the Islamic variety; for the “Left,” it’s of the white nationalist sort. Both rely on the abstraction of a small number of particularly violent or offensive actors in order to extract a kernel of truth from the historical opponent of choice. Anjem Choudary becomes the unmoored, secret essence of Islam; Richard Spenser betrays the perverse, unconscious desires of white America.

There is, of course, some truth in any such abstraction. In some basic sense, Choudhary elevates and enervates specific elements of Islamic doctrine, enlarging them until they are the substantive basis of a religion. Spenser plays upon fears present among white Americans: feelings of forgotten-ness, nostalgia, and wounded pride; in turn, he proposes a series of answers to these questions, tries to convince other white Americans that his views represent their authentic nature within global history.

Because these two take pieces of their respective faiths (one religious, the other racial) and inflate them, subsuming all other possible interpretations into their own, overturning competing traditions, we call them extremists.

A problem arises, however: namely, who among us can deny the charge of being extreme? Two examples:

First, I think of Martin Luther (I was reading about him recently). Take your pick of how he ended up feeling so darn sinful in spite of objective signs of forgiveness (the Sacrament of Reconciliation, inter alia)—his father, his hemorrhoids, whatever. Regardless of our emphasis, we can see that his early reformist tendencies transformed into outright disgust with the Catholic Church as such because of his specific historical moment. His early contention that faith is a gift is hardly remarkable (and, for the record, this was his original contention. By today’s standards it’s so accepted as to have warranted mutual agreement between Catholics and Lutherans). What made his declaration “radical” was the existing corruption of the Church—indulgences were being sold and pilgrimage had been turned into an industry—one didn’t have to be an extremist to note such glaring abuses (protesting them was a commonplace of late medieval literature). The state and inertia of the Church combined with Luther’s seemingly unchanging dourness moved him from simple reformer to anti-papist Reformer. His own overreaction to his historical situation (the extreme corruption present in the sale of indulgences and other concrete religious phenomena) made him an extremist.

Second, I think of myself. It’s no secret that the process of digitization interests, really frightens, me (examples here and here). At an earlier point in my life, this made me an extremist, nearly a Luddite. I was so scared of the effects of our rapid digitization—faced with transhumanism and the general techno-optimism of our times—that I often sounded positively crazy, sometimes verging on denying the goods afforded us by medical science. I have since (to some extent) repented, but the point is simple enough: the specifics of my life and times led me to overreact.

In this each of us is guilty. Every time you profess that the “Right” is a creature of pure homophobia, xenophobia, etc. you engage in this process of quasi-justified (but extreme!) abstraction, mediated by the particularly virulent strain of Right-politics present in our times (but can we ignore certain questions posed by such ideologies: do we need borders? What of personal responsibility in ethics?). By the same token, every time the government is demonized as the unfolding form of an encroaching nanny state, extremism is committed. It is true that government has caused violations of religious liberty, true that there are valid critiques of the nation state, but none of that requires a faith in 18th-century restrictions on governmental power. Again, overreaction wins the day—historical contingency disguises itself as unbiased reasoning.

The response is, as often for the Christian, as powerfully simple as it is seemingly impossible: humility. Consciousness of our own historicity is the key to proper reasoning; if we may posit it, objectivity is only possible from the position of consciousness of one’s own biases, themselves created by historical vicissitude. The easy answer is always to react violently against the age, to repudiate all similarities with the repugnant indulgences of one’s own times, but the hard truth is that such behavior rarely is well remembered—and even more often untrue. One need only think about the legacies of Mao and America after Vietnam to see how quick is the move from addressing valid concerns to corruption and unimpeded violence.

Previous Post

February 10, 2017

Imagining Unity with the Churches of the East

Next Post

February 15, 2017 "Yes"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Culture Politics Reviews Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 December 2020 November 2020 July 2020 May 2020 April 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 August 2019 July 2019 April 2019 March 2019 December 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did Daniel's three friends refuse to worship, resulting in their persecution?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A golden image A Persian king A cedar pole A bronze snake