Communist Francis? Sure, Why Not?

Last updated on: November 14, 2016 at 1:49 pm by Chase Padusniak

Communist Francis? Sure, Why Not? 2016-11-14T13:49:28-04:00 Chase Padusniak

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Obviously, the pope meant Communism, the Marxist form, but I felt the need to clarify to demonstrate that the word itself needn’t be so terror inducing. What to do then with the pope’s comments? Well, I would begin by turning once more to Dorothy Day:

We stand at the present time with the Communists, who are also opposing war […] The Sermon on the Mount is our Christian manifesto.

A Jewish convert said to me once, “The Communists hate God, and the Catholics love Him. But they are both facing Him, directing their attention to Him. They are not indifferent. Communists are not in so bad a case as those who are indifferent. It is the lukewarm that He will spew out of His mouth.”

We need to change the system. We need to overthrow, not the government, as the authorities are always accusing the Communists ‘of conspiring to teach [us] to do,’ but this rotten, decadent, putrid industrial capitalist system which breeds such suffering in the whited sepulcher of New York.

Here we must see that Communists and Catholics may share aims (such as opposing a war). Further, they may work together in the event that the cause in question is some lesser good (protesting a conflict, feeding the poor, etc.). Here we find the root of the pope’s point. When he says that “the communists [perhaps better “Communists”] think like Christians” he sounds just like Dorothy Day above. Now we must ask: with the horrible sufferings of so many under Marxist (recall that “Communism” has never been achieved) governments, how can these two say that “Communists are not in so bad a case as those who are indifferent?”

Again, Dorothy Day’s case is instructive. She was involved in socialist activity early in life before her conversion, and when she took to the streets to read the Psalms and labor among the poor, she found the socialists, the Communists there, not the “capitalists,” not the business executives. In the streets and slums, living with and caring for the forgotten, she found not the mainstream of American culture, but those whose political ideology put them outside of it. This may sound strange, but it really isn’t so. Marx was something of a notorious moralist (yes, believe it or not!). Whittaker Chambers, even after he defected from Communist espionage to American values, spoke highly of the Communist commitment to the poor and marginalized; in fact, it’s a large part of what drew him into the movement in the first place.

The situation is thus rather complicated. On the one hand, yes, it is entirely true that Marxist regimes have killed lots of people (often by unsavory means). On the other hand, it is true that, throughout the 20th century, Communists and other radicals were at the forefront of caring for the poor. The situation, of course, becomes more complicated when you realize (as Dorothy Day did) that our own system (capitalism) has killed many people of its own.

Now, I’m no Soviet apologist, and I doubt Pope Francis is either. I think he is simply a man who recognizes, like Dorothy Day, that often it was (and in some places remains) Communists and the like who are at the forefront of care for the poor. Moreover, I think he is a man, who, if occasionally naïve, recognizes that capitalism has not been a cake walk for many (something that, as a Latin American, he knows firsthand). Besides, it is true that, even as many (rightfully) criticize Marxist regimes, Marx’s starting point was a desire to improve the conditions of the poor and marginalized. That is something to be respected; it is a point of commonality between Christians and Communists (read: “Marxists”).

What we might wish to do, instead of seeking to point fingers and find reasons to disagree with the Holy Father (and there are reasons to criticize him), is to open our hearts to his words, to get out among the marginalized (something I fail at each and every day—heck, I’m writing this sitting on a bed in my apartment). We might learn to learn with Dorothy Day, to develop understanding even with ideological opponents. For, if we Catholics are lacking in love compared to Communists, is it they we ought to criticize first, or ourselves?

Previous Post

November 10, 2016

Confessions of a Catholic Anarchist in Trump’s America

Next Post

November 21, 2016 There and Back Again: Catholicism and Orthodoxy

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Culture Politics Reviews Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 December 2020 November 2020 July 2020 May 2020 April 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 August 2019 July 2019 April 2019 March 2019 December 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the first Judge of Israel?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Gideon Samson Othniel Deborah