Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Religious Music and Entertainment
2016: The Year Catholic Politics Broke

2016: The Year Catholic Politics Broke

Last updated on: November 3, 2016 at 2:03 pm by Chase Padusniak

2016: The Year Catholic Politics Broke 2016-11-03T14:03:07-04:00 Chase Padusniak

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

(“St. Ambrose Barring Theodosius I from Milan Cathedral,” by Anthony van Dyck, 1619-1620. Source: Wikimedia, Creative Commons License).

Every day I log onto Facebook and, against my better judgment, end up observing or participating in some digital political brawl. I’m particularly susceptible, I suspect, because my Facebook friends span the political spectrum—mostly tepid Hillary-supporting anti-Trumpers and adamant Trump advocates, fewer “I’m with Her” types. Regardless, that diversity manages to cause me an unjust anger on an almost daily basis. Now, aside from the clear truth that I need to spend less time on social media (as most of us should), this repeat occurrence has got me asking something so simple, I’m amazed it’s slipped my mind for so long: how can any Catholic actually be excited to vote for a major-party presidential candidate in 2016?

I’m not talking about hold-your-nose Trump voters; I don’t care about those defecting to Hillary because they can’t tolerate Trump’s immaturity. These are positions I can readily comprehend, even if I myself do not agree (I’ve already voted. More on that here). What has taken more thought is how people with sincere (or so one hopes) religious convictions can twist and shout for two of the least likeable—and likely least efficacious—candidates in American history.

I have an idea.

But before I get there, I’d like to make one thing clear: I am not concerned with for whom a Catholic can licitly vote. If you’d like a well-reasoned (and not too long) guide, this piece is very helpful (and honest, unlike a lot of what lots of well-intentioned Catholics are disseminating). But again, my interest here is in the why and how of Catholic politicking, not debated ecclesiastical restrictions.

Especially on the Trump side, there’s been a notable shift: people who supported other Republicans like Cruz going from anti-, to tepid, to rabidly pro-Trump. It’s the sort of political miracle we see every four years, but on a grander scale, with more intensity. Strangely enough, I actually know more Bernie supporters who remain tepidly pro-Clinton than I do ex-Cruz supporters who remain tepidly pro-Trump. Many of the latter have simply sold themselves, jumped on the Trump wagon and now speak of the absolute necessity of a Republican victory. By contrast, lots of ex-Bernie people remain highly critical of Clinton, either voting for her or abstaining entirely.

In a sense, this isn’t all that weird. Parties always push their members to support whomever they nominate. This was, of course, what happened when Hillary supporters flocked to Obama after the 2008 Democratic primaries.

In most elections, though, the primary candidates are not all that different. Getting Obama over Hillary upset a few people because of the historical import of the nomination, but ultimately their politics are two different shades of blue, so to speak. It’s typically the same with the Republicans—even though Romney and Santorum were very different in some ways, their differences were clearly bridgeable. In these cases, it’s easy enough to support the new nominee with nearly the same fervor as your favored candidate.

In 2016, this was not so. Bernie supporters initially held out on Hillary. Trump, the joke candidate, crushed his serious rivals—establishment and rebel, setting off alarm bells for “real conservatives.” Now, it’s like a normal election year on growth hormone. Anti-Trumpers, totally sensible Catholics, are now campaigning for him with more fervor than I have ever seen from, well, virtually anyone in an election year. I’ve seen less, but some of the same from ex-Bernie supporters (for Hillary, that is).

There are lots of obvious reasons: the opponent is especially unlikeable, misinformation regarding Catholic voting obligations, the apocalyptic tone this entire year seems to have taken on. But these are all symptoms. In my view, the real problem, the cause of the symptoms, is the American Catholic idolization of politics.

It hasn’t always been this way. We didn’t always start with the principle that the winner of the election determined the eschatological essence of the future. In fact, Augustine would tell us politics is messy; it’s fallen; ultimately, it’s the sort of place worth staying out of unless you’re absolutely obligated, because there’s almost no chance that it’s not going to involve cooperation in sin.

Good enough so far—I can imagine most rabid Trump and / or Hillary supporters agreeing here. But the implication, then, is that penance is the most reasonable answer. Augustine, after commending Theodosius for his piety, goes on:

He was not like Cinna, and Marius, and Sylla, and other such men, who wished not to finish civil wars even when they were finished, but rather grieved that they had arisen at all, than wished that when they were finished they should harm any one [sic…] And what could be more admirable than his religious humility, when, compelled by the urgency of certain of his intimates, he avenged the grievous crime of the Thessalonians, which at the prayer of the bishops he had promised to pardon, and, being laid hold of by the discipline of the church, did penance in such a way that the sight of his imperial loftiness prostrated made the people who were interceding for him weep more than the consciousness of offense had made them fear it when enraged? These and other similar good works, which it would be long to tell, he carried with him from this world of time, where the greatest human nobility and loftiness are but vapor. Of these works the reward is eternal happiness, of which God is the giver, though only to those who are sincerely pious.

At the end, he’s referring to Theodosius’ submitting to the episcopal authority of St. Ambrose.

Regardless, the point is clear enough: penance takes precedence over justifying the doubtfully ethical practices of a particular candidate. And I cannot help but think that so many have begun to ignore the wrongs of their side and thereby choose a dubious idolization of politics and its power in the world over the requirements of Faith. This has never been clearer than in 2016, when both candidates are so deeply disliked, so clearly flawed, so, frankly, un-Christian.

And so my only advice can be: pick your poison, but pick it with sackcloth and ashes, not with shouting and jeers.

Previous Post

November 1, 2016

Is a Smaller Church a Better Church?

Next Post

November 8, 2016 A Byzantine Prayer for Election Day

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Culture Politics Reviews Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 December 2020 November 2020 July 2020 May 2020 April 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 August 2019 July 2019 April 2019 March 2019 December 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Deborah was a prophetess and judge who led Israel to victory over the Canaanites.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE