Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Religious Music and Entertainment
Why Are You Yelling? Or the Failure of Catholic Blogging

Why Are You Yelling? Or the Failure of Catholic Blogging

Last updated on: July 16, 2016 at 12:29 pm by Chase Padusniak

Why Are You Yelling? Or the Failure of Catholic Blogging 2016-07-16T12:29:41-04:00 Chase Padusniak

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

“St. Francis of Assisi Adoring the Crucifix” by Bernardo Strozzi, c. 1615. Source: Wikimedia, Creative Commons License).

Unsurprisingly, I am surrounded by Catholic bloggers: opponents, friends, frenemies, and every other color of the proverbial Apostolic rainbow. And, frankly—for a long time and from all sides—the sheer intensity of it all has troubled me. Why is everyone yelling so much? What’s with the name-calling?

Obviously anger can easily overcome us; being charitable can be very hard. And yet, God promises us more than pettiness and the gnashing of teeth.

Mark Shea recently (and very bravely) admitted both his sins and his exasperation on his blog, and a recent response to some of my fellow Patheos writers from Austin Ruse over at Crisis shines brightly with the light of condemnation.

With this weighing on my mind, last night I was reflecting on a daily reading, and was struck by a little-read passage in a little-read letter:

This saying is trustworthy. I want you to insist on these points, that those who have believed in God be careful to devote themselves to good works; these are excellent and beneficial to others. Avoid foolish arguments, genealogies, rivalries, and quarrels about the law, for they are useless and futile. After a first and second warning, break off contact with a heretic, realizing that such a person is perverted and sinful and stands self-condemned. (Titus 3:8-11)

“Avoid foolish arguments, genealogies, rivalries, and quarrels about the law, for they are useless and futile.” And how much more true is this when heresy is not the question? If your interlocutor believes the Creed, goes to church, finds grace in the Sacraments, and the other minimum requirements of what we might call an “active and faithful Catholic life,” then why the ire? If the questions at hand are prudential, and not dogmatic or even doctrinal, why not express disagreement in charity?

In fact, earlier in the third chapter of Titus (and it is not a long chapter), the author speaks to the attitude, which must lie behind the injunction I quoted above:

Remind them to be under the control of magistrates and authorities, to be obedient, to be open to every good enterprise. They are to slander no one, to be peaceable, considerate, exercising all graciousness toward everyone. For we ourselves were once foolish, disobedient, deluded, slaves to various desires and pleasures, living in malice and envy, hateful ourselves and hating one another. (Titus 3:1-3)

Now, I know I am naïve; I know that this attitude is precisely what does not (conventionally, anyway) make for good blogging, but I have spent too much of my life weighed down in the quagmire of anger, malice, and self-absorbed sorrow. In other words, I am happy to surrender clicks, views, and reads if it means maintaining a more joyful personage, of demonstrating charity to friends and “foes” alike.

And to think we are called to charity toward the non-Christian more than even the Christian!

If my fellow Catholics have a problem on a prudential question, I am happy to have (an even intense) discussion, a debate—an art common to the medieval schools, the, perhaps to this day, most famous hotbeds of rational Christian discourse.

If we cannot treat each other with mutual respect and love, what hope do we have of convincing the world of God’s peace?

And, for what it’s worth, I see no reason that the St. Maria Goretti question (the most recent cause of this controversy) can’t have a “both / and” answer. Purity can be preferable without being necessary, or, frankly, at times even personally desirable (for example, as a man with a past, I have found it prudential to date people who also have pasts, though that is not a universal rule for everyone; it is merely what most allows me growth and mutual understanding). The virgin-martyr can die to protect what she conceives of as a virtue, motivated ultimately by a faith in Christ—thus we get both “purity” and “love / faith” as causes, with plenty of room for prudential decision-making. Of course, how one expresses that complex relationship is important, and it is precisely this how that has been the subject of this post.

I submit St. Francis de Sales as an example that the medium can, in fact, be (a great deal of) the message.

Pax Christi, amici.

Previous Post

July 15, 2016

Social Media: Where Charity Goes to Die

Next Post

July 17, 2016 Versus “Versus Populum”

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Culture Politics Reviews Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 December 2020 November 2020 July 2020 May 2020 April 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 August 2019 July 2019 April 2019 March 2019 December 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

A woman who had suffered bleeding for twelve years was healed by touching Jesus' what?

Select your answer to see how you score.

His hand His feet His cloak The hairs of his head