Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Religious Music and Entertainment
Liberalism is Conservatism is Not Catholicism

Liberalism is Conservatism is Not Catholicism

Last updated on: July 8, 2016 at 5:40 pm by Chase Padusniak

Liberalism is Conservatism is Not Catholicism 2016-07-08T17:40:10-04:00 Chase Padusniak

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

(“Saint Bernard’s Vision of the Virgin and Child,” 15th century, by Simon Marmion. Surely an illiberal image! Source: Wikimedia, Creative Commons License).

The topic of this post is the word “liberal”: its meanings, its misuses, and what it ought to mean to Catholics. For some, this post might seem redundant. Among certain groups, the word’s origins and contemporary obfuscation are a well-known fact. Forgive my boorishness. But too often I encounter people, usually well-meaning, who want to, or do, debate whether Catholics ought to be “liberal” or “conservative.” This is the wrong question, but even so, the only valid answer is “neither.” And so, an answer, even if an extreme one, is due.

That said, let the investigation begin.

In popular discourse, we use “liberal” to mean “left of center” and “conservative” to mean “right of center.” Thus many a faithful Catholic delights in decrying his ideological opponents. In this way, “liberal” is used as an attack on those in support of gun control, those who support a robust welfare state, and those who desire cuts to the military’s budget. The preferred positions, we are told, are conservative: concealed carry, divestment from state programs, and impregnable defenses (and what gymnastics are needed to make them seem straightforwardly Christian!).

This is wrong, nothing more than an example of historical amnesia. Catholicism has about as much to do with American ‘liberals’ as it does with American ‘conservatives.’ As Leo XIII knew, Americanism is a heresy.

What do I mean? How dare I stand up for those supporting abortion, those implicated in the destruction of Christian morality itself?

“Liberalism” is a post-medieval innovation, mostly developed by Protestant economists and philosophers, whose ideas have, by-and-large, not been taken seriously by the Church. Don’t believe me? Ask a late nineteenth-century priest. His response. “Liberalism is a sin.”

“Liberalism” finds its roots in the musings of men such as John Locke, David Hume, and David Ricardo. Notions of “natural rights” and “social contractarian governance” arose from these thinkers and their predecessors, which, in turn, came to influence the development of virtually every state and institution in Europe and the Americas.

The tradition branched in many directions, divisions that can be felt in our own founding, hence the dispute over the French Revolution between Jefferson and Adams. One observes a similar break in England between the Young and the Old Whigs. Regardless, both groups of Whigs had their roots in anti-Catholic and anti-medieval views of theology and anthropology.

Effectively, these two subsets have yielded today’s “conservatives” and “liberals,” some more closely wedded to the ideas of “original liberals” like Locke and others who draw greater influence from “later liberal” thinkers like Rousseau, and eventually more utilitarian and technocratic ones like Bentham and Keynes. Both sides, however, have more in common with each other (notions of “natural rights,” an emphasis on “freedom,” etc.) than they do with even their most radical medieval forebears. It is in this sense, that I would contend Nietzsche has more in common with Catholicism than does Thomas Jefferson.

Liberal thinkers might turn to ancients, like Cicero, for justification of their principles, but we ought to remember that these readings are always, to some extent, anachronistic and non-Christian. Cicero was a pagan, notable for his rhetoric and political maneuvering, not a Christian famous for his largesse. And even that leaves out the fact that the way the medievals read Cicero has differed rather markedly from his later political valorization.

To return to the main point, and in short: both main sides of our contemporary debate can trace their lineages, at best, back to the 17th century, and even then, to the same root.

Today, three primary groups represent opposition to the Liberal tradition: the “Far Left,” the “Far Right,” and the Church. From the first perspective, Liberalism, in all its varieties, is nothing more than a historical relic, used to continue to oppress the peoples of the world, hence Marx wrote very disapprovingly of Liberal thinkers, and Mao published a pamphlet called Combat Liberalism. From the second, one need only look to monarchist groups and even Neo-Nazis. Monarchists desire a return to the pre-Liberal period (I would argue that their notions are very Liberal, but there is no space for that here) while Nazis saw themselves as socialists, enemies of the weak Liberalism of the Weimar Republic.

Obviously, these various ideologies have come to influence the Church greatly and in various ways, at least in certain quarters (examples here, here, and here). Many an “illiberal Catholic” falls on either the Far Left or Far Right of our political spectrum. But the intricacies of those ideological lenses are not my concern here.

More importantly, Liberalism has clearly exerted an influence on the Church, one which some have argued is important, though it must be carefully controlled, while others seek its absolute and complete extermination. Again, this is not my concern here; instead, I have tried to point out how separate the Liberal and Catholic traditions are, and how much work would be required for their full synthesis (arguably, and probably, an impossibility).

I do not pretend to have conveyed any new information, nor to have made any new arguments. But if even one person reads this and reframes his or her thoughts about what Catholicism ought to be, I shall be happy. The truth is that the Catholic Church, in its foundational differences with Liberalism, is best set against it as a critique, a corrective, not joined to it as a partner in handholding. I might even say that both Pope Francis and Cardinal Sarah are “illiberal,” though their American supporters and opponents seem to have no understanding of this reality, instead cramming them into a pre-fabricated, Western, Liberal lens.

It’s a shame, since social justice, respectful liturgy, and orthodoxy can quite easily go together. An idolatrous, as opposed to a constructive, relationship to Liberalism blinds us to this reality.

Perhaps Catholics feel so much dissonance these days because of this attempt at full reconciliation; perhaps the insanity of such a coupling gives us good-hearted people willing to support Donald Trump. Perhaps.

For my part, I think reframing this discussion, reframing it to the point where no Catholic is willing to set “liberal” or “conservative” against the other as if they mattered, is the key to a faithful future, a future unavoidably influenced by, but far from beholden to the paradigmatic reformulations of, Liberalism.

Previous Post

July 6, 2016

Judge Not: An Obscure Monk Sheds Light on Pope Francis

Next Post

July 11, 2016 Being a Good Christian, Being a Sinner

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Culture Politics Reviews Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 December 2020 November 2020 July 2020 May 2020 April 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 August 2019 July 2019 April 2019 March 2019 December 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does God question Job about, showing His wisdom in creation?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Kingdoms Religious rituals Battles Animals and nature