Revising the “Disability [Pride] Flag”

Last updated on: July 12, 2026 at 4:56 pm by Jane the Actuary

0 Comments

Revising the “Disability [Pride] Flag” 2026-07-12T16:56:46-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

It’s Disability Pride Month, as declared by various disability activist organizations, such as The Arc Nation Council of Self-Advocates, Access Living of Chicago, and ADAPT, and with it comes various posts on social media promoting the Disability Pride Flag, a design originally created in 2016 by Ann Magill, an American woman with cerebral palsy, but promoted as if it’s somehow “official” and it seems to have gained traction simply because it filled a need, what with all the variations of what was once the “gay pride flag” and similar flags for identity groups.

Here’s the flag, as originally designed:

The designer’s description, per Wikipedia:

The red stripe represents physical disabilities.

The gold stripe represents neurodiversity.

The blue stripe represents emotional and psychiatric disabilities (or in other descriptions, disabling mental illness)

The green stripe represents sensory disabilities.

And the white stripe represents undiagnosed and invisible disabilities.

Now, none of the explanations, in the Wikipedia article or its references, explain any connection between the colors and the disabilities represented. Some further Q & A revealed that according to Grok, green represents the sensory works because of its association with nature, and therefore perception. Blue was chosen to represent mental illness because of the association with sadness and its existing use for mental health awareness campaigns. The colors gold and red are much more of a stretch: gold representing “value, creativity, innovation” or the “gold standard” and the contributions of neurodivergent people and red “conveys strength, vitality, passion, resilience, and the body’s physical reality.”

I’m not a fan of some of these associations – in particular, “gold” for neurodiversity really leans heavily into the notion of autism or ADHD as a source of intellect/attention to detail and creativity, respectively, rather than recognizing the severe impairments of a person with autism with a high level of severity who will not be able to live independently. The red stripe, likewise, represents an idealized person with a physical disability who overcomes their limitations, which to me seems a bit unrealistic, to put disabled people on a pedestal.

But of greater concern is the background, described as follows:

The faded black background mourning and rage for victims of ableist violence and abuse.

I find this highly problematic.

A number of years ago, I commented on the (apocryphal) Margaret Mead quote that the first archeological evidence of “civilization” was a human femur which had been broken and then healed; that is, unlike animals, humans had reached a point of caring for someone who was injured rather than leaving that person to die. Apocryphal-Mead called this “civilization”; I called it being human. And care for disabled people is evident in the archeological record: based on a Grok Q & A, there are several examples in the record, such as a skeleton from 10,000 years ago in Italy of 20 year old girl with a severe form of dwarfism, which would have required care from the community, and another case in Vietnam from 4,000 years ago of a child with quadriplegia who survived for 10 years with total dependence. Of course, other cases of disabled people dying due to neglect, malnutrition, abuse, or outright killing, would be invisible in the archeological record.

In written records, we know the legal construct of exposing infants born with disabilities existed in ancient Greece and Rome, though it was not necessarily the norm. In any event, the rise of Christianity was a turning point, with its explicit rejection of infanticide, and its promotion of charitable care for the sick and disabled. The Bible has stories of disabled people — the man born blind, begging until he is healed, and the paralytic man, lowered through the roof by his friends to be healed.

But what has transformed the lives of disabled people has been a combination of not just the desire to care for people, and growing levels of integration and societal support — so that “surprise unknown sibling in an institution” is now nothing more than a plot point in historical fiction — but also growing levels of prosperity, knowledge, and technology.

The reason, after all, for the commemoration in July is that that’s the month the Americans with Disabilities Act was passed, and activists commemorate the protest action in which various physically disabled people crawled up the Capitol steps, the “Capitol crawl,” in protest of its lack of accessibility — but the very concept of accessibility of multi-story buildings is contingent on widespread availability of elevators, which we take for granted but were obviously not available at the time of the construction of the Capitol and required its retrofitting. Other elements of the ADA, even in just the most basic level of accommodations, are less dependent on technology but still carry with it a cost, such as ramps, curb cuts, or accessible bathrooms. And many accommodations are more costly still, such as the cost of retrofitting a subway or L station, or the cost of paratransit, or the wide-scale adoption of sign-language interpreters. The types of accommodations for deaf employees are heavily technology-dependent, such as the hiring of on-demand remote sign-language interpreters, which would obviously would not have been possible until the 2010s, before which an on-site translator would have been needed and would have missed the mark on the provision that employer accommodation not be unduly burdensome. Similarly, for someone who’s blind, text-to-speech and similar tools were transformative, as well as, in daily life, smartphone apps including navigation apps. And likewise, for the physically-disabled, not only do electric wheelchairs, highly-sophisticated prosthetics, and other mobility technology transform lives, but without the prosperity of our modern era, it would simply be inconceivable for the government to provide full-time one-on-one aides so that an individual with physical impairments can live independently, attend school, work, etc.

Now, I’m not denying the existence of “ableism” in its various forms, beyond the question of whether the government is providing the “right” level of services and whether private businesses are providing “enough” accommodation. We as individuals encountering disabled people engage in acts of ableism when, for instance, we treat someone with a physical disability as if they are unable to speak for themselves, or when we fail to treat someone with an intellectual disability with respect. But it is absurd to pretend that there have not been extraordinary changes for the better.

Which is why I asked Grok to make these changes for a better design:

A white background, rather than charcoal, to symbolize hope rather than anger.

The stripes from bottom left to top right, signifying progress.

Two symbols representing the disabled and the non-disabled community’s roles in that progress. First, a sprout, signifying development and growth, both of the movement and the progress of individual disabled people, reaching their full potential, whatever that may be for any individual. And second, two hands and a heart, signifying the broader community recognizing its obligation to use its resources (yes, including financial resources, but a dollar sign would be too crass) for its disabled members.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

June 30, 2026

In which I comment on the Supreme Court decisions

Next Post

August 14, 2026 Illinois’ Assisted Suicide Law is, yes, literally deadly

I was made a watchman for the house of Israel. If I failed to warn the wicked, whose blood would be required?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The wicked person's The people's The watchman's No one's