Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Politics and Religion
Curing the Birth Dearth: Reading Hannah’s Children

Curing the Birth Dearth: Reading Hannah’s Children

Last updated on: November 30, 2024 at 8:22 pm by Jane the Actuary

0 Comments

Curing the Birth Dearth: Reading Hannah’s Children 2024-11-30T20:22:17-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

from flickr, https://www.flickr.com/photos/davidswiftphotography/2200020857; Creative Commons 2.0

Why has the birth rate cratered in the “developed world” including, quite recently, the United States? The standard answer includes a heavy dose of “children used to contribute to the family’s financial well-being, as farmworkers and future caretakers in old age, now they are just a costly burden.” Catherine Ruth Pakaluk, herself the mother of 8 and also a business professor, sought to find an answer by looking at the other side of the coin: women who make the intentional choice to have large families. Her approach was to seek out women across the country with 5 or more children, who were American born and college-educated, so that they had to go against the grain, that is, they faced the conflict of childbirth and career advancement more directly than those without that degree. Altogether she and her co-researchers conducted 55 interviews, and these are the heart of Hannah’s Children: The Women Quietly Defying the Birth Dearth.

Here’s the bottom-line-on-top version: among these women, the trade-off that women generally experience, which for many is becoming insurmountable, that each additional child means greater sacrifices in terms of family finances, career, travel, entertainment, etc., with diminishing rewards, is not present for these women. Instead, each additional child means less marginal cost and greater marginal benefits — that these mothers, and their families, don’t perceive of the love they have for their children to be finite and spread too thin, but instead, they feel that the joy and satisfaction they experience (and that of their husbands and children) only increases.

If the real cost of a child is what you give up to have one, that cost decreases with additional children after two or three. . . . The total cost to a woman’s identity, status, and lifestyle of having more than an average-sized family was counted as huge by the women in my sample — but the marginal costs diminished.

At the same time, we heard a story of increasing marginal benefits with more children. The rough idea was that the joy of an additional child reverberated among all the members of the family, especially when the older kids reached early teenage years and beyond. With more kids, there were more people to have and share the joy. This fact, superadded to their baseline reasons to keep going, meant that the marginal value they attached to having a child actually increased with more children. For them, children weren’t like a consumption good with diminishing satisfaction. Women frequently reported enjoying their fourth, fifth, and sixth babies more than their firsts and seconds — as incredible as that may sound. (p. 149).

This sounds right to me, at least from my experience as a mother of three — the more kids, the more confidence you have, and it’s a game-changer when the older children can help with the younger ones. She also writes that this is not something those older children experience as a burden, but they enjoy the little ones and the experience as “older children in large families” enables them to grow into more well-adjusted adults than responsibility-free children of small families.

Who are these women? They are Jews, or Mormons, or Catholics or conservative Protestants. Some felt called from childhood to have large families, others had a conversion experience, others found there way into large-family-hood more “accidentally” simply by having one child, then another, and enjoying parenting so much they wanted to keep going. In some cases, there was a definite, “the purpose of marriage is to have as many children as God gives you,” but this was mixed with a more typical belief in discernment of God’s will for their particular situaton, paired with, as any one child got into toddlerhood, a feeling of readiness for another one. And, to be sure, the interviewees ranged from 5 children to 12; these were not all “mega-families.”

These women were also quite keenly aware of what they left behind. Several maintained careers, one a professor, another a pediatrician (with a stay-at-home husband), though most left behind careers or the prospect of careers, which are for so many of us the source of our identity, but they believed that the financial sacrifice was, once accepted, not a big loss, and that benefits were worth the cost. As one mother expressed it, “it gives us structure and allows us to grow and feel connected to something higher than ourselves” (p. 168).

In several instances, touchingly, the interviewees also raised dimensions the interviewers hadn’t even considered: having a baby provided healing for a father or an older sibling experiencing anxiety or depression or recovery from grief.

So what does this book reveal about the various efforts undertaken in one country after another to boost the birth rate by means of increasing maternity leave or day care subsidies or cash benefits for parents? Pakaluk doesn’t believe this will have an impact. The decision to parent isn’t made (or not made) for financial reasons. It’s social, it’s cultural, it’s, as she phrases it, “reasons of the heart” — and these are ultimately driven by religious belief, so that the best way to encourage more children is to strengthen religion — though by then she’s on the last two pages of the book so doesn’t really have much in the way of concrete suggestions on how to accomplish that.

What’s more, in the end these are 55 interviews with women who responded to requests. It’s not a random sample, and it likely misses women who are unhappy with the path they ended up on. Perhaps those women are few in number, but we don’t really know.

Finally, there is a hole in the narrative: while religious belief is a key part of these women’s lives, there are certainly many observant Jewish, Mormon, Catholic or conservative Protestant women who have “normal” levels of children. I did not finish the book with a clear picture of what the secret sauce is that led these women down the path the others didn’t follow. For example, some of these women grew up in large families so that it was naturally to do the same; but there are many women who grew up in large families and did not follow this path. What’s the difference. Inquiring minds want to know.

Uncategorized

families

fertility rate

Previous Post

November 29, 2024

The chicken shredder, tariffs, and self-sufficiency

Next Post

December 22, 2024 Trust an Actuary: The Social Security Fairness Act is unfair

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Yup, Pretty sure that trans athletes are a major issue that needs to be decided ..."

E Brown

In which I comment on the ..."

"Do you pray to the golden calf, too? You seem like the type."

Rick

Is there a fix for gerrymandering?

"This includes our President, who according to all accounts doesn't read unless it's 1) small ..."

captcrisis

Are 28% of Americans truly functionally ..."

"For the test being digital vs paper, people do tend to do better with hard-copy, ..."

Bemused

Are 28% of Americans truly functionally ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What island was John on when he wrote Revelation?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Cyprus Patmos Crete Malta