Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Politics and Religion
Crazy cat ladies, etc.

Crazy cat ladies, etc.

Last updated on: July 30, 2024 at 10:15 pm by Jane the Actuary

0 Comments

Crazy cat ladies, etc. 2024-07-30T22:15:41-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

So JD Vance’s criticism of childless women, or crazy cat ladies, went viral over the past week, with various pundits claiming this was disqualifying in the election for Vice President. His claim, quite simply, was that childless women were less able to think about the long-term future, than mothers whose perspective was influenced by their concern with their children.

Will those childless women, and the child-ful women who support their literal or figurative sisters, rise up in support of Kamala Harris? Or, on the other hand, is Vance right that women without children cannot think about the long view of the future of the country and put their own immediate desires first? (Yes, you might ask, “what about the crazy cat men?” and, let’s face it, there seems to be a certain assumption that women are voluntarily choosing to be childless and men are either, as “incels,” involuntarily without a relationship, or else, even if in a relationship, are not the decision-makers around starting a family.)

But the rise in childless women, or childless adults, is in fact real and might, in fact, cause some real problems.

It should go without saying that not all women are called to be mothers, and not all men are called to be fathers. (Even discarding the current popularity of “childfree by choice,” the Catholic Church has had celibate religious life since its start.) But it’s a problem for society if not enough men and women are willing. Is this a trivial and obvious statement, in the same way in which not every individual has a moral obligation to be a doctor/firefighter/teacher/etc., but if everyone in the country collectively rejected these jobs, we’d be in a world of hurt? It’s murkier than that — after all, we only need a small proportion of Americans to choose any given profession, and said profession can be made more attractive by its pay or working conditions. But for our society and our economy to be stable, we need for the large majority of men and women to have children — and we seem to be headed in the wrong direction. You’d think it would be obvious, that, since pretty nearly all of us have grown up as a part of a family — whether large or small, with or without both parents or extended family — that young men and women, as they grow up, would see their future as one in which they start their own families. But in a society which increasingly treats having children as a sort of hobby, to be undertaken only by those who are sure it is the right fit for them, it seems likely that those young men and women will become no more likely to think of having a family as a normal part of adulthood, because of their own childhood, than that they would model themselves after their parents’ career choices, or actual hobbies.

For reference, looking at a calculation by Lyman Stone at Institute of Family Studies from 2022, the prior peak prevalence of childlessness was for the birth cohort born in 1904, who would have been 25 when the Great Depression started. (This is all eyeballing off of a chart.) About 25% of these women were childless. With the return of economy prosperity after the war, that rate dropped to a low of about 10% for women born in 1934, and for the latest cohort of women who have passed their fertile years (1974-ish), the rate is back at 15% — but with the much more recent, very sudden drop in fertility, Stone projects that for women born in 1989, or age 35 now, somewhere between 25% and 30% could end up being childless (depending on the data source), and the jump is so high there’s no telling what the ultimate trendline will be.

Stone’s interpretation of survey data is also that women are not, by and large, “childfree” — that is, they do not reach the end of their fertile years without children due to a deliberate choice, but despite having wanted children. They either don’t succeed in finding a spouse while still young enough, or don’t feel they have established themselves sufficiently, or for other reasons don’t have the children they always intended to have.

But whether women (or couples) deliberately choose not to have children or simply end up without them due to an accumulation of decisions and life experiences, there’s more at stake than just “will there be enough children in the future?” because, yes, I can believe that parents will make different voting decisions, or other types of decisions about control. After all, we saw children get the short end of the stick with schools closed for far longer than they should have, in the aftermath of covid. And in the longer term, however much we seem to have escaped the consequences of the ever-growing national debt, we won’t be able to avoid them forever — the need for austerity measures or tax increases (or both, or maybe a tax increase is a form of austerity?) will increase the intensity of the debate over federal spending and tax levels because, campaign promises notwithstanding, we will be faced with harsh choices. Should our limited resources be directed at daycare subsidies or other benefits for parents, or be directed at increasing Medicare or Social Security, or funding long-term care programs?

And, no, the answer is not immigration. In this day and age, when we repeatedly read the demographic statistics that a growing percentage of young Americans are immigrants, and that the racial/ethnic composition of young Americans is diverging dramatically from older Americans, and the growing emphasis on pursuing “equity” for those of your own racial/ethnic group, why would those new immigrants be at all interested in the welfare of strangers, merely because they happen to occupy the same territory? The answer is families, with adults connected to new generations through their children, and to the generations which preceded them through their parents. But if we forget or abandon that, we are in trouble.

By Carin Araujo, http://www.prtc.net/~carin (Stock.xchng #197853) [Copyrighted free use], via Wikimedia Commons

Uncategorized

fertility rate

Previous Post

June 16, 2024

Is Cardinal Cupich a "prayer-denialist"?

Next Post

July 31, 2024 Six "Blasphemous Olympics Opening Ceremony" Comments

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Yup, Pretty sure that trans athletes are a major issue that needs to be decided ..."

E Brown

In which I comment on the ..."

"Do you pray to the golden calf, too? You seem like the type."

Rick

Is there a fix for gerrymandering?

"This includes our President, who according to all accounts doesn't read unless it's 1) small ..."

captcrisis

Are 28% of Americans truly functionally ..."

"For the test being digital vs paper, people do tend to do better with hard-copy, ..."

Bemused

Are 28% of Americans truly functionally ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does Paul tell Timothy to do with myths and old wives' tales?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Refute them Correct them Ignore them Have nothing to do with them