Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Politics and Religion
On Being Family (Un)Friendly

On Being Family (Un)Friendly

Last updated on: April 28, 2024 at 2:18 pm by Jane the Actuary

0 Comments

On Being Family (Un)Friendly 2024-04-28T14:18:16-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A family painting effort

Tim Carney has a new book out, Family Unfriendly, with, as usual for books these days, a subtitle that explains what the book is about: “How Our Culture Made Raising Kids Much Harder Than It Needs to Be.” And, in an effort to think more about the book before it goes back to the library, I’m going to blog about it.

Before I get into the content, a brief why-it-matters: having parents who are stressed and unhappy matters for a couple reasons. First, just because it’s a bad thing for people to be unhappy. Second, it’s not just a matter of parents sacrificing themselves to enable their children to be better off, but that outcome doesn’t even occur. And, third, of course, it leads to the low birth rates which are ultimately bad for our society.

As a further bit of context: Carney’s target audience is middle class and much of his focus is on the experiences of those families. Although he addresses broader issues, the social trends he focuses on are not necessarily as applicable to poor families. In particular, many of the key components of family unfriendliness are related to middle/upper middle class individuals treating child-rearing as a “hobby,” no more worthy of social support than woodworking or marathon-running. That leads to a greater willingness of people to criticize parents and parenting and talk about children as germy, and dirty, and too loud to be in public, or to push for places to be “child-free,” and that leads to a growing undercurrent that children are fundamentally “bad” by causing climate change or causing the spread of illness through their endlessly runny noses and inability to keep their hands to themselves or sufficiently sanitized. On top of that, the pressure parents experience to parent their children intensively is relentless, including the demands of specializing in a sport young and of travel sports (and the difficulty of finding sports opportunities that are more low-key), the need to chauffeur children everywhere because of neighborhoods built without walkability, the punishment exacted by the broader community for parents who don’t except the new rules to constantly supervise children, and more. Then there’s the narrative of “parenting is hell” — the very idea that parenting is relentless suffering from birth until adulthood. And on top of that, there’s a growing narrative — well-intended, perhaps, in its effort to try to erase the idea that women who never marry have no value to the world or themselves — that it is success in employment which matters most in life, not marriage and family.

Of course, there are also financial issues, and the costs of raising children are non-trivial. But Carney points out that it is objectively not the cost, in some absolute sense, which deters people, because wealthier couples are less likely to have children, or likely to have fewer of them, than relatively poorer families.

Carney also features neighborhoods/regions/countries with higher birth rates, and points out that there is a certain amount of self-reinforcement: if you live in an area with lots of children, then having children is just “what you do.” That’s true in Utah and among observant Jewish families in part because of their religion but also because of their communities, and he explains that in Israel, even non-religious families have higher-than-typical-“Western” birthrates (even if not as high as Orthodox families) because of the overall environment, in which children are a normal part of the community rather than perceived of as a burden.

And in the end, Carney’s final chapter addresses “civilizational sadness.” I’m not sure if that’s a term he coined, but I don’t see it in a quick online search other than with respect to Carney’s ideas. The idea here is that the lack of desire to have children comes from a sense, within a society/culture/civilization, that are not worthy of reproducing ourselves and continuing our society. Hence, Germany’s longstanding low birthrate, he pairs with their losses in World War I & World War II; while Germany had a “Baby Boom” after the war, it was very small relative to elsewhere, and he pairs the dramatic fertility rate decline with the reckoning that Germans had with their deeds in the War, in the 60s. In the U.S., on the other hand, the Baby Boom of the 50s and 60s was paired with a national mood of optimism, and the dramatic decline now is paired with the relentlessness with which the young, childbearing-age generation has been fed narratives of doom, both in terms of environmental collapse and societal harms (the new narrative that racism is worse than ever or that democracy will collapse at any moment). In that respect, those groups which still have relatively higher birth rates are those which propose a counter-narrative, that is, religions which promote an optimism about the future and about the value of humanity.

So what’s Carney’s bottom line? He does not really have a lot to say in the way of government policies, except to voice criticism of those policies which push mothers (or, more generally, both parents in a two-income household) into the workforce for the purpose of expanding GDP numbers. His book ends up being focused more on encouragement for parents or future parents. But I am asking myself what the takeaways are for those of us who believe we should consider how we ourselves can be more “family friendly.” Can we, as regular churchgoers, or as residents of suburbs, or as [fill in the blank] do things to support families or change society’s expectations for parents?

Uncategorized

family friendliness

fertility rate

Previous Post

April 28, 2024

A visibility day (or week or month) we actually need

Next Post

May 22, 2024 The SAT, ESL, and the demise of the Chicago Tribune

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Yup, Pretty sure that trans athletes are a major issue that needs to be decided ..."

E Brown

In which I comment on the ..."

"Do you pray to the golden calf, too? You seem like the type."

Rick

Is there a fix for gerrymandering?

"This includes our President, who according to all accounts doesn't read unless it's 1) small ..."

captcrisis

Are 28% of Americans truly functionally ..."

"For the test being digital vs paper, people do tend to do better with hard-copy, ..."

Bemused

Are 28% of Americans truly functionally ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I asked, 'What must I do to be saved?' after an earthquake freed my prisoners. Who am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The Philippian jailer The Ethiopian eunuch Cornelius A Roman centurion