Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

janetheactuary

Some words in support of “No Labels”

Last updated on: February 18, 2024 at 9:00 pm   by Jane the Actuary

0 Comments

Some words in support of “No Labels” 2024-02-18T21:00:02-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Voting_United_States.jpg; By Tom Arthur from Orange, CA, United States (vote for better tape) [CC BY-SA 2.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

What is “No Labels”?

No Labels is an entity which may – or may not – field a “unity ticket” for the 2024 presidential election.  They state that — in time for the 2024 election — they will poll key states and, if they deem it feasible, they will offer nationwide ballot access to a candidate-pair they select to be an Independent Unity ticket.  For clarity, it is not clear to me from their FAQ whether they already have ballot access secured or whether they simply have plans to do so, and one the people most frequently mentioned as a potential candidate, Joe Manchin, has taken his name out of consideration.

Their ideas are, broadly speaking, to find a middle ground in as many policy issues as possible.  They have a booklet, Common Sense, available as a PDF, which I’ve read through and, more or less, the proposals are indeed common sense solutions, for example, treating the debt with the urgency it deserves, ending abuses of the asylum system while granting permanent residency to adults brought to the US as minors, an all-of-the-above energy strategy, and so on.

Who is “No Labels”?

The group keeps its donors anonymous, with the justification that “we live in an era where agitators and partisan operatives try to destroy and intimidate organizations they don’t like by attacking their individual supporters. Since No Labels launched our 2024 insurance project, we’ve been threatened online with acts of violence, including death threats.”

However, the group lists its executive directors, chief strategist, national political leaders, and a board of advisors — though the only name I recognize is Joe Liberman.

Critics from the Democratic party say that the group is nefariously planning on playing spoiler by siphoning off votes for Biden, to enable Trump to win.  Trump-supporting critics claim the reverse, that it’s a scheme to ensure a Biden win.

But I think they make a credible case.  Both Biden and Trump have a relatively small “hardcore base.”  Both moderate Democrats and moderate Republicans want an alternative.  The electorate is balanced enough that a third candidate would take enough of a balanced ratio of votes from both sides that he or she would not be a “spoiler” — and that based on current polling, would have a real, meaningful chance at winning.  In fact, on a web page that I can’t find any longer, they cite details from Ross Perot’s campaign in 1992, that his polling peaked at 38% during the summer, and only some serious missteps on his part brought his final vote share down to 19% — but even then, exit polls showed that he did not actually act as a “spoiler” but drew votes roughly evenly from voters who would have otherwise voted for Clinton or for Bush.

Having said that, I raised this question on a community Facebook group.  The response was this:  you get two choices.  That’s all.  You have to pick a side.

Now, I know that No Labels, should they decide to field a candidate, will find it challenging to persuade even the anti-Trump, anti-Biden portion of the electorate that it is a feasible choice to vote for their candidate, that it won’t truly be a wasted vote.

But my perspective, at this point, is somewhat different.  Biden is a terrible candidate.  Trump is a terrible candidate.  I am done with playing the game of either, “yes, Biden isn’t great, but Trump is a threat to democracy so you must vote for Biden to preserve democracy,” or swapping the names around for the opposite result.  (Side note:  Trump may be saying crazy things, but it is his opponents who are abusing the legal system to seek to jail and fine him, not least of which in the case of last week’s colossal $450 million fine for his statements about real estate values.)   am not willing to select either of them on the premise that their opponent is so horrible.  Granted, I live in a state where, in a Trump vs. Biden match-up, my vote simply does not matter, and I know that an assertion that, even in a hypothetical where I lived elsewhere, I would choose the same way, is a bit hollow — but it is still true that I view the choice as a different sort of binary:  not Trump vs. Biden but “some other candidate” vs not voting for President at all.

As a side note, this sort of situation absolutely makes me wish we had a proportional representation system such as Germany’s, where voters dissatisfied with the head of the party they have voted for in the past, could chose a different party, even a small one, without any of this nonsense of “throwing your vote away.”

But without that system, honestly, I am completely done with these games of “you must choose between these two choices.”

I will not vote for Biden.

I will not vote for Trump.

I will not be forced into this choice.

I will hope that enough Americans also reject this false choice.  I may even make efforts to try to persuade those Americans, however futile those persuasion attempts may be and even though the No Labels candidate, if there is one, would be decided in some figurative smoke-filled back room.  But no matter what, none of us has a moral obligation to vote for an objectionable candidate, just because the other major-party candidate is worse.

 

Politics

Donald Trump

joe biden

No Labels

Previous Post



February 10, 2024

Can "Small Groups" change the world? (+Trump, Biden, & Food)

Next Post



March 10, 2024 How smart is the Pope, really?

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Yup, Pretty sure that trans athletes are a major issue that needs to be decided ..."

E Brown


In which I comment on the ..."

"Do you pray to the golden calf, too? You seem like the type."

Rick


Is there a fix for gerrymandering?

"This includes our President, who according to all accounts doesn't read unless it's 1) small ..."

captcrisis


Are 28% of Americans truly functionally ..."

"For the test being digital vs paper, people do tend to do better with hard-copy, ..."

Bemused


Are 28% of Americans truly functionally ..."


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Christian tradition is known for ornate mosaics and icons in their churches?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Presbyterian Baptist Adventist Orthodox

Related posts from Jane the Actuary

Family

Trust an Actuary: The Social Security Fairness Act...

Jane the Actuary

Family

News from the world of English Language Learning

Jane the Actuary

Family

In which we learn that Biden isn't a...

Jane the Actuary

Family

Debate Post-Mortem

Jane the Actuary

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

How to Make a Decision When You Can't...

Main point: It’s much more valuable to stay close to God so...

Archdiocese Hosts Military Marriage Retreat in Germany

RASTATT, Germany — The transient military lifestyle, with its frequent deployments and...

Minted in God's Image

Nearly every morning, I make the drive to Detroit with my high-school-age...

The Real AI Story Is Adoption Without Trust

Artificial intelligence has crossed a political threshold. It is no longer a...

Walking through History

  A new article, written by Jeff Lindsay and Gale L. Pooley,...

Swimfan: Forgotten Aughts Pleasures

This is a recovery effort. In 2002, My Big Fat Greek Wedding...

view all Catholic blogs

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube