Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Politics and Religion
Is the cruelty the point? Cardinal Cupich’s mean-spirited anti-Latin Mass regulations

Is the cruelty the point? Cardinal Cupich’s mean-spirited anti-Latin Mass regulations

Last updated on: December 27, 2021 at 8:26 pm by Jane the Actuary

Is the cruelty the point? Cardinal Cupich’s mean-spirited anti-Latin Mass regulations 2021-12-27T20:26:31-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cantius-church-chicago-wide.jpg

Yes, this irritates me enough to prod me to write after a long break. Well, that and the fact that it’s Christmas break in my graduate program and we’re all relaxing this evening.

I am not an attendee of the Traditional/Tridentine Latin Mass. I’ve gone, a few times. I get the concept, at least I think I do — that it’s not about the Latin per se but about the mass being, at least in part, an opportunity for silent prayer rather than a community event, that the priest is not a “performer” for his audience the instrument through which the Transubstantiation of the bread and wine occurs, etc., so that you don’t actually need to know Latin to find the spiritual meaning in it. And, heck, I’ve always said, if Elizabeth Ann Seton could convert to Catholicism as a young 18th century widow, as a result of observing mass, rather than despite it, then there is value there.

So it’s not my cup of tea but I fully support those people who do find it to be meaningful, and for whom this form of worship simply is a better fit than the post-Vatican II mass, which, let’s face it, regardless of language, is often enough something much more mundane, with music that offers no sense of the holy, with priests who might face the assembly, but what does that matter, really? And why should those people be punished as a result of the few who say, “only the TLM is valid,” any more than that post-Vatican II mass goers should be punished because among their number are a multitude of Catholics whose belief in the doctrines and moral teachings of Catholicism is tenuous at best.

So when the Pope issued his new regulations over the summer, Traditiones Custodes, I cheered for the bishops who said, “all my parishes where the TLM is said are a-ok with the modern form of mass, and I don’t see any need to make any changes here,” and was saddened at reports of dioceses where the bishop aggressively shut down masses.

Now it’s come to Chicago, where Cupich has issued a letter the exact contents of which are not visible to the public (I suspect quite intentionally so) but some choice quotes and the decrees of which are being reported by Catholic media, for instance, Vatican News, National Catholic Reporter, and National Catholic Register. (The full letter can be read at the website of St. John Cantius.)

The new requirements ban the celebration of mass in the old form on specific days: “the first Sunday of every month, Christmas, the Triduum, Easter Sunday, and Pentecost Sunday.”

Yes, you read that right: on exactly the holiest days of the year, traditional Catholics will be prohibited from worshipping in the way that is most spiritually meaningful to them.

What’s more, even though there is no prohibition, in the post-Vatican II liturgy, of the priest standing “ad orientem,” that is, facing the altar, Cupich has prohibited this as well.

And what are Cupich’s reasons for this policy? Here are the explanations, such as they exist, according to Vatican News:

In continuity with Pope Francis’ own desire, Cardinal Cupich states the hope that this policy will foster a renewed understanding of the “foundations of the liturgical renewal”. He also hopes that the priests will share this with their respective parish communities. The Cardinal then connects rediscovery of “the value of the liturgical reform” with the Eucharistic revival launched by the U.S. Bishops at their November plenary meeting.

Sorry, but near as I can tell, TLM attendees already understand the value of the Eucharist more than your average novus ordo mass-goer, so this is a preposterous claim.

The article continues:

To this end, the Cardinal says that the Archdiocese’s liturgy office will be providing materials and support to priests in providing “liturgical catechesis and formation” so the faithful “can come to a better understanding and deeper acceptance of the restored and renewed liturgy that is part of the precious heritage of the Second Vatican Council”.

And later says

This requires that pastors accompany people to understand “the link between the way we worship and what we believe”, the preamble states.

and recommends that priests visit TLM worshippers

to help them understand the essential principles of renewal called for in the Second Vatican Council and appreciate how the reformed Mass introduces them to a greater use of Scripture and prayers from the Roman tradition, as well as an updated liturgical calendar of feasts that includes recently canonised saints.

In addition,

Priests seeking authorisation to use the pre-Vatican Missal are also requested to accompany the faithful who want to continue to attend Mass celebrated in that rite. They are asked to discuss the “possibility of using the reformed liturgical rites” which can be celebrated in Latin. In this way, the priest himself manifests that while “seeking the good of those who are rooted in the previous rite,” he is also “accompanying them towards the common use of the one lex orandi of the Roman Rite”.

Which all adds up to the expectation that TLM mass-goers are only to be temporarily accommodated until they can be “converted” to the novus ordo.

Cupich treats these people as if they have been trapped in a cult and need to be deprogrammed, or as if they are immigrants from afar who need loving assistance in integrating into our world. He fails to recognize that they have found the novus ordo mass lacking, not in terms of some sort of theology, but in terms of what it can offer them in their spiritual life. Parishes which offer the Traditional Latin Mass often offer both masses, and those who have chosen the former have done so deliberately. They know that the new liturgical cycle offers three cycles; they are also perfectly capable of reading their Bibles at home.

Or is Cupich perhaps simply cynical? Parishes are struggling, while St. John Cantius downtown (not an archdiocesan church) is filled to the brim with families who drive in from far afield. Does he want to “keep those families for himself”? Heck, I’m not even sure if the Archdiocese gets a cut from their contributions to Cantius as he does from parish assessments, which would mean he has a financial incentive to shut them down, or decrease attendance there.

Whatever his motive, whether he intends it or does so out of ignorance, Cupich is wronging those people who are simply seeking to worship God.

Image: St. John Cantius, Chicago, Illinois

Uncategorized

Latin mass

Previous Post

August 14, 2021

It's 1975 again. Was it avoidable?

Next Post

January 1, 2022 Three Cardinal Cupich Updates That Make The Story Look Even Worse

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I was only seven years old when I became king and reigned for forty years in Jerusalem. Who am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Josiah Manasseh Hezekiah Joash (or Jehoash)