Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Politics and Religion
“SMART” goals, police reform, and protest marches

“SMART” goals, police reform, and protest marches

Last updated on: June 3, 2020 at 3:58 pm by Jane the Actuary

“SMART” goals, police reform, and protest marches 2020-06-03T15:58:01-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Have you had to write goals as a part of your company’s performance review process? Reader, I hated this — as a consulting firm we had some goals which were prescribed (largely around billable time) and were supposed to, in addition, some up with additional goals by which to be judged at the end of the year. Sometimes they were dictated to me, sometimes I was told to come up with them myself, sometimes they made sense within the context of long-term projects I worked on, and sometimes they did not. In particular, towards the end of my time there, the boss started with a push that “everyone should be selling, not just the partners and lead actuaries” and we were all required to place on our goals, a goal to find some new work to propose to a client. Ugh. In earlier years, goals were treated lightly enough that we could write up our goals halfway through the year, and my prior manager was perfectly happy with my writing up things I had already done as goals to check off.

But nonetheless, readers with this experience will be familiar with the concept of “SMART goals” — an acronym which is not entirely consistent but in one common approach says that goals should be

Specific

Measurable

Attainable

Relevant, and

Time-based.

(See, for instance, Indeed.com for this explanation.)

And way back when Colin Kaepernick first started kneeling, part of my reaction was that there was no clear goal in mind for his actions. (I checked – I didn’t blog about it at the time.) (Boy, wouldn’t it be embarrassing if it turned out I had even though it didn’t turn up, and I said the opposite!)

Even now, I am seeing many calls for racial justice, generally speaking, and calls for “reform” but not a lot in terms of how to get from here to there. “Get rid of bad cops!” “Add more anti-racist training!” “Train cops in de-escalation!” But who, and where, and how? Minneapolis is a “blue” city, and Minnesota is a “blue” state, and not in the form of blue-collar party-machine unionist Democrats, but with full “social justice”/”progressive” credentials.

I am finding that rightie twitter is happy to say that the answer is, in part, to bust police unions, because they give their bad apples protection in the same way as teachers’ unions protect bad teachers (e.g., placing them in the so-called “rubber rooms” rather than canning them), and stand in the way of other reforms by placing cops first, in the same way as teachers’ unions place teachers first over children. But even narrowing the prescription down, what is the path there, especially when it is countless cities which govern themselves independently in this respect? I would suspect that very few readers are from Minneapolis. Do you have a role to play in pushing Minneapolis to reform its police department? Is your role as an involved citizen limited to investigating the policing practices of your own police department?

What about federal legislation — is that a good idea, or is it an inappropriate crossing of boundaries? Should the federal government be involved in mandating reforms? In providing grant money? Should we all be writing our congresscritters? Should we be donating to nonprofits which research and evaluate training programs to provide data-driven best-practices? And is there a trade-off, a point at which police officers become so fearful of harming arrestees (or the consequences of being accused of such) that they simply stop doing police work and public safety is at risk?

This is a lot more complex than just “caring about black lives.”

In fact, Cardinal Cupich’s own statements on the matter, in the form of a column in the Chicago Catholic newspaper, offered similarly non-actionable exhortations.

We need to ask ourselves and our elected officials: Why are black and brown people incarcerated at higher rates than whites for the same offenses? Why are people of color suffering disproportionately from the effects of the novel coronavirus? Why is our educational system failing to prepare children of color for a life in which they can flourish? Why are we still asking these questions and not moving heaven and earth to answer them, not with words, but with the systemic change it will take to finally right these wrongs? . . .

Other societies have experienced unfathomable offenses against humanity and found ways to engage the history, to admit the crimes, to hold accountable those who committed them and to move toward something resembling reconciliation: the murder of 6 million Jews by the Nazi regime, the Rwandan genocide, the crimes of South African apartheid. We Americans can do this too. We are well past overdue for such a national reconciliation and the need to account for the history of violence against people of color in this country. . . .

Only the hard work of familial love will set us on the path toward justice.

There is nothing actionable here.

“Systemic change”? What does that even mean? Plenty of activists, when they call for this, mean changes as dramatic as the full-on adoption of a “classic” European social welfare state (but always with taxes levied on the rich to fund it) or even the adoption of Marxist-Lenninism.

A “national reconciliation”? The South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission was not a mass penance performed by white people towards their black neighbors. It was not a matter of reparations, certainly not in the manner in which present-day American discussions propose massive federal spending such as free college for black students, home down payment grants for black homebuyers, etc. And it had to do with actual crimes perpetrated, not some sort of process by which Karens are to be re-educated in their sins of calling the cops on black men, or crossing to the other side of the street.

And “familial love”? Again, it’s not actionable.

So, readers, what “SMART” action could a white middle-class suburbanite take that would (along side actions of others) achieve a goal?

Image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Trump-WomensMarch_2017-top-1510075_(32409710246).jpg. just a generic “protest march” picture.

Previous Post

June 1, 2020

Protests, riots, justice - the Jane the Actuary take

Next Post

June 12, 2020 A sewing-machine metaphor (and people aren't machines)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who provided bread and Goliath's sword to David at Nob?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Abiathar Jonathan Abner Ahimelech the priest