Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

janetheactuary

A sewing-machine metaphor (and people aren’t machines)

Last updated on: June 12, 2020 at 9:56 am   by Jane the Actuary

A sewing-machine metaphor (and people aren’t machines) 2020-06-12T09:56:37-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Kenmore 158.904, mid-1960s

Here’s a bit of an anecdote from the life of Jane the Actuary:

I own a vintage sewing machine — a Kenmore model 158.904 from the 60s which I bought for $25 at a garage sale when it was already old, and have taken along with me from apartment to home to move-up home, since then.  It is sorely lacking in bells & whistles — it has cams (templates for making custom stitches) and a buttonhole-making device, but a modern machine would have these features built-in as well as an automated threader, stop-start, and much more.  But in addition to sentimental reasons, I’ve held onto it because it is all-metal, has a 1.2 amp motor, and can basically handle anything I throw at it, with respect to thickness of the material, helpful when I’m sewing a kids’ Halloween costume rather than merely a quilting project, for example.  (For comparison, even a “heavy duty” modern machine only has a 1.0 amp motor.)

At the same time, though, it has given me more than its fair share of troubles and, over the last several months since I started sewing face masks, has been giving me particular problems with thread bunching (”birds’ nests”), thread breakage, and tension issues that would send spools of thread flying off the holder on the machine, which I could minimize but not solve regardless of how many times I oiled the machine or studied up on YouTube videos or videoed the machine in operation and watched the slow-mo playback.  And I kept asking myself and lamenting to my husband:  “I’ve always had issues with tension.  But I’ve never had this particular issue before; I’ve never had a spool of thread fly off.”

Finally, just the other day, I switched to another type of project, and another type of stitch, which gave me the insight I needed.  Reader, common sense would dictate that, when installing a needle, one inserts it as far into the needle slot as it fits, so that it is as stable and secure as possible.  But, it turns out, that had been my mistake all along — the needle was too high, and the “hook” was not picking up the thread consistently.  I lowered the needle a slight bit, did some test stitches, and the machine worked flawlessly.  (In hindsight, early on in the face-mask sewing, I broke a needle.  What caused that I don’t know, as that hadn’t happened before, but my installing that needle might have started this whole issue.  Or maybe not; in any case, I think in a modern machine, there is a proper adjustment lever.)

Or at least it did last night.  Fingers-crossed that’s true when I sew more than a test swatch.

Why do I tell this story?

My Forbes article from earlier this week, on the implications for pension liabilities of a “disband the Chicago police” strategy, I titled, “Defund The Police, Cut Pension Liabilities? The One Weird Trick That Just Might Work For Chicago,” in an ironic reference to the countless gimmicky articles claiming to offer “one weird trick” for weight loss or the like.  I think at this point, readers of internet advertisements do understand that there is no “one weird trick” that provides easy answers.

But we nonetheless too often want all our problems to have “one weird trick” that solves them, something easily achievable if only someone smart enough thinks of it, in the way in which I struggled to find, and, yes, ultimately did find, the “weird trick” to fixing my sewing machine.

It’s the old bit about “if we can put a man on the moon, we can also solve [intractable social problem].”  The “man on the moon” is a matter of engineering, of math, it’s my “surely my sewing machine, as a machine, is fixable” issue on a much larger scale.

But “fixing” the fact that black Americans have a greater poverty level and lower median income than white Americans?  And make no mistake – the discussion among politicians and pundits and policy experts of various kinds has moved beyond implementing another round of reform in policing to the insistence that this larger issue has to be solved right away and, generally speaking, by means of either the conversion of the United States into an extreme version of a European social welfare system, or the provision of those benefits specifically to descendants of slavery.

And this drives me batty – all the more so because those lauded social welfare systems, such as Sweden, have the very same sorts of challenges with their ethnic minorities’ economic situation, in particular, with respect to immigrants from Muslim countries.  Asian countries are just as likely to be racist, even if their labeling of “race” doesn’t conform to the labels we consider to be universal.  I know everyone would like to believe that if we were just willing to pull this one lever we haven’t pulled, we’d be able to fix this, but I just don’t see that happening.  I don’t even see any “role model” countries.

Humans aren’t machines.  We can’t make an adjustment to the gears to fix us.

As to what I think should happen?  I haven’t got a clue.  Honestly, seriously, I don’t know.  I know to be very wary of unintended consequences.  I know that those folks who care deeply and passionately about the issue can’t be deemed more likely to have the answers just because they care more, and I know that even people “in the trenches” can be mistaken about what the answers are, especially if they see the people they’re trying to help always in the best light possible.  (Pet peeve: everyone promoting maintaining the $600/week bonus unemployment benefit and insisting that because people are basically good, they will come back to their jobs even if it means a loss of income.)  I know that I can dig into numbers but can’t myself, personally, throw myself into some sort of “community organizing” work because it would be a sure guarantee that I’d screw it up and have everyone mad at me for not saying the right things.  And, frankly, it worries me that every institution — every corporation, every small business, every charity, every museum — is now being called upon toe make this their cause even when they have no particular expertise and should focus instead on what they can actually do with effectiveness.

Finally, tangentially, as a related update, I’ve been sewing face masks.  My current tally is 150-ish given away.  To be honest, I’ve mostly stopped, now that they are available in stores, in either reusable or disposable versions, for decently affordable prices, and they seem to also be providing an income for some otherwise unemployed folk.  (One reads reports of garment-industry manufacturers switching to face masks, and I also notice that the ones the local dry cleaners are selling appear hand-sewn rather than imported from China.)  I’m considering sewing a few for the food pantry collection later today, simply because, when in the bathroom at the grocery store the other day, I saw a woman who, honestly, looked on the poorer side of things, taking off her disposable face mask, and it was grimy and clear that she’d been reusing it repeatedly.  Which means that the need is less clear.

 

Uncategorized

sewing

social change

social justice activism

Previous Post



June 3, 2020

"SMART" goals, police reform, and protest marches

Next Post



June 16, 2020 American society falling apart, one action at a time


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Psalm is quoted by Jesus on the cross, "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?"

Select your answer to see how you score.

Psalm 137 Psalm 2 Psalm 22 Psalm 34

Related posts from Jane the Actuary

Family

The new generation is ruining X, outdoors edition

Jane the Actuary

Family

In which I think about Sarah Jeong, racism,...

Jane the Actuary

Family

What about the "iGen"?

Jane the Actuary

Family

Affirmative-Action Rhodes Scholarships?

Jane the Actuary

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

The First Eucharistic Controversy: Christ’s Real Presence

For Catholics, the Eucharist is the source and summit of the Christian...

What a Stop Sign Can Teach Us About...

How to Make a Decision When You Can't Hear God Main point:...

Archdiocese Hosts Military Marriage Retreat in Germany

RASTATT, Germany — The transient military lifestyle, with its frequent deployments and...

Minted in God's Image

Nearly every morning, I make the drive to Detroit with my high-school-age...

The Real AI Story Is Adoption Without Trust

Artificial intelligence has crossed a political threshold. It is no longer a...

Walking through History

  A new article, written by Jeff Lindsay and Gale L. Pooley,...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube