RIP, Annual Catholic Appeal

Last updated on: February 20, 2020 at 2:33 pm by Jane the Actuary

RIP, Annual Catholic Appeal 2020-02-20T14:33:24-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

https://pixabay.com/en/no-money-poor-money-no-crisis-2070384/

Yes, round about a year ago, I griped about the Annual Catholic Appeal and spent what may have been overly much time digging through the pastoral center’s annual report and trying to understand whether the money came from and where it went to. I was particularly peeved last year because, just before the appeal began, the Cardinal had every parish play a recording in which he spoke about (as I phrased it at the time) “how very much he cared about victims of sexual abuse and how very saddened he was at all the bad things that had happened and how very hard he was going to work to fix everything” — and the timing was clearly intended to calm Catholics before asking them to donate more money. And between the lack of detail/transparency in the Archdiocese’s expenses and the Appeal itself, and the various ways in which Cupich had been a complete a** about the latest abuse scandal, including a demand that every parish read a letter in which he defends himself against accusations of indifference which he brought upon himself by saying, in an interview:

The pope has a bigger agenda. He’s got to get on with other things, talking about the environment and protecting migrants and carrying on the work of the church. We’re not going to go down a rabbit hole on this.

Since then, Cupich hasn’t aroused my ire quite as much — except, I suppose, for the bishops’ meeting at which he talked about following not so much Jesus Christ as “Francis’s teaching”:

The cardinal referenced a speech given to U.S. bishops on Nov. 11 by the papal nuncio to the United States, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, in which he urged them to consider “practically” how they have “received the magisterium of Pope Francis.”

and the context was an effort by Cupich to get the bishops to agree to add a wordy statement to a letter to voters which would have had the effect of saying that the well-being of refugees and the poor is of equal importance to the denied right to life of the unborn. (As context, recall that the state of Illinois passed a law which, among other things, mandated that all insurance plans include abortion with the same cost-share provisions as any similar service; Cupich objected at the time but has been quiet ever since — by which I mean not merely that I don’t recall him saying anything but that a google search with “cupich” and “abortion” limited in time to the period after that law was passed turns up nothing other than this particular dust-up. Apparently he spoke at the March for Life but there’s neither a video nor a transcript, and the speech he gave last year, well, it was weak, at best, speaking as if the only reason why abortion is wrong is the Donald Trump reason, that that lost human life could have made some contribution to the world that we miss.)

But I nonetheless made a point of worshipping outside the Archdiocese this past weekend, because I couldn’t stand yet another round of listening to Cupich asking for money in his best man-of-God voice, followed by the priest (not of his own volition, but following the Archdiocese’s instructions) not merely asking everyone to fill out a pledge card, but following a script (literally: “Please print your first name, your spouse’s first name, and your last name on the top line” . . . “On the second line, please print your address, including any unit or apartment number” etc.) And — to their credit — when, last year, I returned one of the countless mailings from the Archdiocese asking for money, with a $0 and a request to no longer be contacted, they complied.

All of which is preface to an article in the Washington Examiner on Tuesday, “Trump economy works for everyone except corrupt Catholic bishops.” Now, folks in Washington have particular reason to be p***ed, what with being ground zero for the Cardinal McCarrick scandal (the promised Vatican report regarding which is still outstanding, by the way), but nonetheless, that article reports that the Archdiocese of Washington saw a drop off in donations for its version of the bishop’s appeal of one-third, that the Diocese of Arlington saw a 7% drop, and Peter’s Pence donations are down by an (unspecified) amount as well. That article further references the Washington Post, which cites not only data but also “man on the street” comments by people who object to — you guessed it — not just the scandal but also the lack of transparency, and reports that anecdotally people try to give in targeted ways to ensure their parish, not the Archdiocese, benefits (something that I’ve also considered but, knowing that the Archdiocese levies an assessment of an unknown amount, I’ve concluded is probably a lost cause; if, copying the anecdotal parishioner, I wrote a check directly to pay for utilities, the parish would presumably still be required to pay a fraction of this income to the Archdiocese anyway).

Now, there is no centralized reporting of such data, and, as it turns out, the Archdiocese is behind schedule in posting its annual report (the fiscal year ends in June, and the 2018 annual report was completed in December of 2018, but the 2019 report is not yet available). So whether the Cardinal’s behavior prior to last year’s appeal had an impact on donations, we don’t yet know. But I hope it did, and I hope that brings about change, even if merely for Cupich to, at the margins, be somewhat more transparent about money and somewhat less focused on his top priorities of immigration, the environment, and the like, rather than ministering to the Catholics of greater Chicago.

Uncategorized

Archbishop Cupich

Previous Post

February 19, 2020

Sometimes, lawmakers just aren't that smart

Next Post

February 21, 2020 Some notes on a Latin mass

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Daniel interpreted King Nebuchadnezzar's dream about a statue made of different metals.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE